Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sixshooter

Iron offset, promote a hook or not

12 posts in this topic

I am looking to buy new irons this season. currently playing with Macgregor JNPs reshafted with Nippon shafts. I have been using the same irons for over 20 years and think my swing could use a little more help than these irons give me. My dilemma is that my miss is a pull hook. I know that it is fundamentally a swing error (a little bit of a flip) that I am working on. That being said I don't want to exasperate my problem but the idea that offset promotes a hook is not an absolute and I have read a lot of controversy on the topic.  I am looking at the Callaway apex which has  the forgiveness that I want or maybe the AP2 which has less offset. This is a big expense

and I don't want to get it wrong. Thanks for any info

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Originally Posted by Sixshooter

My dilemma is that my miss is a pull hook. I know that it is fundamentally a swing error (a little bit of a flip) that I am working on. That being said I don't want to exasperate my problem but the idea that offset promotes a hook is not an absolute and I have read a lot of controversy on the topic.

Well you have probably covered a lot in what you have read. My understanding is that the primary advantage can be getting your hands in front of the ball. Generally a good thing for your swing. Back to that in a moment. I know some make note that offset moves center of gravity back slightly (as compared to the shaftline). The claim is this slight move helps get the clubhead to square at impact (for someone who slices). It stands that such a phenomenon might also push the clubhead past square for someone. I wouldn't get too carried away with this, though. You are talking a minor change in center of gravity. Odds are variances in shaft flex in your set would have more impact than such a slight change, but I will defer to anyone who can illustrate the math.

Hands in front of the ball is a good image, you want to be hitting down and through the ball and not scooping at it. While offsets help groove that image in your head, they only gets your hands in front by essentially moving the clubhead back. It's a bit like having one of those circus mirrors that make you look thin in your workout room; it provides a good image, but it may mislead you into thinking you are doing something you aren't.

Are offsets the cause of your occasional hook? You should talk to your pro, but I would doubt your equipment issues are so severe that they are the major cause whatever problem you have.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking to buy new irons this season. currently playing with Macgregor JNPs reshafted with Nippon shafts. I have been using the same irons for over 20 years and think my swing could use a little more help than these irons give me. My dilemma is that my miss is a pull hook. I know that it is fundamentally a swing error (a little bit of a flip) that I am working on. That being said I don't want to exasperate my problem but the idea that offset promotes a hook is not an absolute and I have read a lot of controversy on the topic.  I am looking at the Callaway apex which has  the forgiveness that I want or maybe the AP2 which has less offset. This is a big expense

and I don't want to get it wrong. Thanks for any info

http://thesandtrap.com/t/69693/offset-irons-conventional-wisdom-vs-reality#post_893056

Doesn't really cause much of anything with the swing. The distance it is offset versus less offset clubs is not that big in the grand scheme of the golf swing. Meaning, you are only talking about a fraction of an inch. Lets just look at AP2 versus AP1. Apex didn't show their offset.

AP2 for a 7 iron has an offset of 0.110"

AP1 has a 0.145"

Taylormade Steelblade has it at 0.154

So you are talking about 0.035 to 0.045 inches.

Less than a tenth of an inch. Now think about it this way, that is less than a tenth of an inch moving at, lets say for a pro, 94 miles per hour. For an amateur, I would guess 70-80 mph.

Look at it this way, lets say 75 mph, that is 110 feet per second, or 1323 inches per second. So think about that. The club face is adjusted only 0.045 inches. Yet the club moves at 1323 inches per second. The club face is moving WAY TO FAST for anything significant to happen.

Basically the only thing offset might does is look different. Basically it causes you to line up with the face closed because the toe to heel relationship is off, so your eyes probably want see the heel and toe line up to be square, but since the toe is further back, you bring that more forward, so you close the clubface more at address.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Basically the only thing offset might does is look different. Basically it causes you to line up with the face closed because the toe to heel relationship is off, so your eyes probably want see the heel and toe line up to be square, but since the toe is further back, you bring that more forward, so you close the clubface more at address.

That's what I've been sayin', yep.

Edit: errr, yeah, like the link you posted. :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

thanks for the info, went to Golfsmith and hit the Apex irons with the offset  they felt great and seemed to hook less that my gamers. Set up a fitting for Friday.  Seemed like I set up with the ball a little back in my stance to compensate, but they felt great.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't hit an iron with a lot of offset. Hook machines. Same for woods. The irons I play have minimal offset. No worries about hooks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking to buy new irons this season. currently playing with Macgregor JNPs reshafted with Nippon shafts. I have been using the same irons for over 20 years and think my swing could use a little more help than these irons give me. My dilemma is that my miss is a pull hook. I know that it is fundamentally a swing error (a little bit of a flip) that I am working on. That being said I don't want to exasperate my problem but the idea that offset promotes a hook is not an absolute and I have read a lot of controversy on the topic.  I am looking at the Callaway apex which has  the forgiveness that I want or maybe the AP2 which has less offset. This is a big expense

and I don't want to get it wrong. Thanks for any info

With your 8.6 index I'd be very surprised if offset improves anything in your game, you already know how to hit a golf ball.  Just sayin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With your 8.6 index I'd be very surprised if offset improves anything in your game, you already know how to hit a golf ball.  Just sayin.

Offset doesn't improve anything. Its a minuscule amount of distance compared to a very fast moving object. All it does is cause a person to aim their club more left.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Offset doesn't improve anything. Its a minuscule amount of distance compared to a very fast moving object. All it does is cause a person to aim their club more left.

So it doesn't promote hooks but most likely a pull?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So it doesn't promote hooks but most likely a pull?

It promotes a closed clubface through visual deception. What ever that does to your ball flight, it is because of your swing. If a guy can hit a push draw with tons of offset, then it clearly doesn't bother him as much or maybe he's adjusted to it otherwise.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Promoting a forward hand position that helps an average player square the clubface at impact is the primary benefit of offset. What iacas says matches the advice from the GolfWorks school I attended.

Another factor: individual differences in the human eye. If what looks "square" to you is actually several degrees closed, this could contribute to leftward shots. Also, having the ball too far back in your stance can product draws, etc. A lesson might be the best first step.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks, I went to Golfsmith and got fitted, tried several different irons and settled on the apex irons, they do have offset which I am not used to but they felt great and the numbers were great also, they didn't seem to increase a hook so I took the plunge. They should be in in about  2 weeks. I hope they work as good as they felt on the indoor simulator.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • so you think it's pointless to work more on your short game then long game? I never said it is pointless to work on the short game. What I am saying is that the numbers regarding strokes gained and such agree that more strokes can be saved by improving tee shots/long game compared to short game.    if you work on your short game more and then work on your long game you will score better because your short game is where it really matters. This thread with over 30 pages of great information backed up by statistics seems to disagree with you  just cause i worked on my weakest parts of my game.  If your short game is a glaring weakness relative to your long game, then of course working on the weakest parts of YOUR game benefited you the most   and lets say you can drive it and your 2nd shot is 130y into the green and you come up short or go into the bunker. and your short game isn't good at all and you can get around the green in 2 but you end up with a 4 or 5 because you can't control your balls on the greens or even putt.  Most golfers (even pro) are happy if they are around the green in 2 and end up with a 4.....  by you saying "lets say you can drive it" you are assuming that high handicap golfers (target audience of this thread) are able to drive it in play and consistently enough to leave themselves 130yds into the green, which simply isnt the case. Even on a short 375yd par 4, that would require a 245 drive, back that to 400 yds, and now that requires a 270 yd drive, which the majority of golfers, lets alone high handicap golfers, aren't capable of hitting. Now lets say you CANT drive it, so your 2nd shot is 200y into the green from the rough and through some trees. That is a much worse situation to be in, and more often than not, that approach from 130 yds is going to be much closer to the green than that shot from the rough at 200 yds is, regardless of how good or bad your short game is.
    • I get what Dave is saying...if the ball is simply rolled back distance-wise, the guy who is 30 yards shorter than the big hitters will still be 30 yards shorter, so the longer hitters will still have an advantage.  But, once upon a time distance was not such a huge factor and there were plenty of guys who were not among the longest hitters winning on a regular basis.  When did this change? The big change happened when solid core golf balls were introduced, so roughly 1999.  The reason was that although everyone gained distance with the new balls, the guys with higher swing speeds gained more distance than players with below average swing speeds (average driver clubhead speed on Tour is about 113 mph).  So even though the shorter hitters picked up 10-15 yards, the big hitters gained 25.  This created a bigger separation and this is when short hitters found it more difficult to compete with the big hitters and the focus shifted more heavily on hitting the ball long. The new balls didn't spin nearly as much off the driver either, so they were much straighter.  Clubheads had already started getting bigger and more forgiving, so hitting precise shots was not as important.  This created a new generation of players who could swing as hard as possible and not get hurt by hitting marginal shots.  Spin was the great equalizer!  Back in the day, even power players had to hit the ball well to play, so you still had guys who were long (Andy Bean, Fred Couples, Davis Love III) but still had to swing within themselves. Here is a good example of how much the new ball changed things...In 1981 Dan Pohl was the longest driver on Tour with a 280.1 yard average.  13 years later in 1994, Davis Love III led the Tour in driving distance averaging 283.8 yards (just over 3.5 yards difference). Just 9 years after that in 2003 Hank Kuehne was at 321.4.  That's 37.6 yards longer!  Pretty impressive. Not to take anything away from Hank, but if he had to play with a persimmon driver and a wound ball there is a good chance he would have never gotten his Tour card.  Players could not swing as hard as they do now simply because it was imperative to hit the sweet spot and to control the spin.  Before anyone brings up Bubba Watson and tries to point out that he is long and works the ball like they used to back in the day, let me stop you. If Bubba had to play with traditional gear, he might not break 80.  I understand he is a multiple major winner, but I'm telling you, he doesn't hit the ball precisely enough to have even been a pro, much less win majors. Check this out:  In 2010, Bubba and Corey Pavin were in a sudden death playoff along with Scott Verplank.  Their stats for the week: Pavin's Stats: 
      Driving Distance 262.0
      Driving Accuracy 89%
      GIR 74%
      Putts Per GIR 1.643
      Sand Save Percentage 1-1- 100% B. Watson Stats:
      Driving Distance 321
      Driving Accuracy 66%
      GIR 71%
      Putts Per GIR 1.63
      Sand Save Percentage 3-4 75% Bubba was hitting the ball 60 yards longer than Pavin, but hit less greens and more bunkers.  The first playoff hole, Corey hit a hybrid into the green, Bubba hit sand wedge.  If Bubba hit less fairways, less greens and more bunkers with today's drivers and balls with Corey spotting him 60 yards, he would have no chance with a ball that spun twice as much.
    • I wonder if you can still get the build stats on those club with the serial number. Couldn't hurt to call them.
    • This is extremely specific. I understand if there isn't much to be said.  One of my local courses is Miami Shores GC in Troy, OH. As near as I understand Mr. Ross designed the course very near the end of his life (the course opened in 1947). It's always sort of been neat to think that greatness touched one of our local munis. I do understand they have substantially changed both nines since then and would love to have seen it as Ross created it.  Any details on this project would be really cool.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. BreakingBadly
      BreakingBadly
      (34 years old)
    2. dreamcrusher28
      dreamcrusher28
      (45 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon