Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4217 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Do you turn in amateurs who knowingly breach amateur status rules?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      8


Recommended Posts

Posted

If you know of a club that is promoting a cash prize tournament for amateur golfers (ie: 4 man scramble that will pay the winning team $1000/player) - do you feel obligated under USGA rules to say anything? What if you know some of the players, and compete against them in State Association amateur events? Do you talk to the host club about making the event compliant for amateurs?


  • Administrator
Posted

I'd inquire at the club before doing anything first. Maybe you read it wrong? Is it cash or is it a combination of cash and credit or something to get to the $1k?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
100% cash! the club knows it against the rules... Pro says "everyone does it". It's being promoted with mass emails titled "Big Cash Payout".

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

How do they prevent cheating on a big cash prize like that?  I refuse to play scrambles anymore because of all the cheating I've seen over the years.


Posted

This may sound like a silly question but does it make a difference that a 4 man scramble isn't really a game of golf (i.e. played under the rules of golf) and is really just a gambling event?  As with the previous poster, I have to wonder who would really be willing to put money into an event where there will be cheating everywhere.


Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn725 View Post

If you know of a club that is promoting a cash prize tournament for amateur golfers (ie: 4 man scramble that will pay the winning team $1000/player) - do you feel obligated under USGA rules to say anything? What if you know some of the players, and compete against them in State Association amateur events? Do you talk to the host club about making the event compliant for amateurs?

Quote:

8-1. Decision On A Breach

If a possible breach of the Rules by a person claiming to be an amateur golfer comes to the attention of the Committee , it is a matter for the Committee to decide whether a breach has occurred. Each case will be investigated to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee and considered on its merits. The decision of the Committee is final, subject to an appeal as provided in these Rules .

. . .

Committee

The " Committee " is the appropriate Committee of the Governing Body

Governing Body

The “ Governing Body ” for the administration of the Rules of Amateur Status in any country is the national golf union or association of that country.

Note: In Great Britain and Ireland, the R&A; is the Governing Body .

Forward a copy of the email announcing the event to the "Committee" of the governing body in your jurisdiction and let them handle it.  In your case, assuming Praire Dunes is in the US, the governing body in question would be the USGA.  I wasn't able to find the name or email address of the USGA Committee on Amateur status, but if you send it to the USGA I'm sure they will get it to the right place.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To be clear, this event is not at Prairie Dunes or promoted by Prairie Dunes

I used Praire Dunes because that is the only indication I had as to your location and therefore what your national governing body is.  No implication that it was Praire Dunes that was ignoring the amateur rules was intended.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This may sound like a silly question but does it make a difference that a 4 man scramble isn't really a game of golf (i.e. played under the rules of golf) and is really just a gambling event?

This is interesting point. As scramble is not played under (full) RoG, why would it affect amateur status?


Posted

This is interesting point. As scramble is not played under (full) RoG, why would it affect amateur status?

It would seem so. From the Rules on Amateur Status

An amateur golfer, whether he plays competitively or recreationally , is one who plays golf for the challenge it presents, not as a profession and not for financial gain.


Posted

It would seem so. From the Rules on Amateur Status

An amateur golfer, whether he plays competitively or recreationally, is one who plays golf for the challenge it presents, not as a profession and not for financial gain.

I also noticed somewhere in the Rules on Amateur Status where it states that it does not matter if the competition takes place on the course, on the putting green or on the driving range.  So I guess that covers just about any type of game that you use a golf club and a golf ball whether its played under the rules of golf or not.


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by luu5

This is interesting point. As scramble is not played under (full) RoG, why would it affect amateur status?

It would seem so. From the Rules on Amateur Status

An amateur golfer, whether he plays competitively or recreationally, is one who plays golf for the challenge it presents, not as a profession and not for financial gain.

But the rules don't even recognize a scramble as golf, so how can it be considered as earning money at golf?

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

But the rules don't even recognize a scramble as golf, so how can it be considered as earning money at golf?

The Rules of Golf and the Rules of Amateur Status are two separate entities. There is nothing in the RoG about Amateur status

Of course the Game of Golf consists of playing a ball with a club from the Teeing Ground into the Hole by a Stroke or successive Strokes in accordance with the Rules . That does not mean that if a player breaches a Rule, he is not playing golf.

Scrambles are not 'not recognised'. It simply that the format is not specified in the Definitions and that inherently, Rules will be breached when being played. If play is conducted other than in accordance with the Rules of Golf, the Rules of Golf Committee will not give a decision on any question. 'Conducted' means that the committee has determined that the R0G will not be followed not that individual players may or may not breach a rule.


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

But the rules don't even recognize a scramble as golf, so how can it be considered as earning money at golf?

The Rules of Golf and the Rules of Amateur Status are two separate entities. There is nothing in the RoG about Amateur status

Of course the Game of Golf consists of playing a ball with a club from the Teeing Ground into the Hole by a Stroke or successive Strokes in accordance with the Rules. That does not mean that if a player breaches a Rule, he is not playing golf.

Scrambles are not 'not recognised'. It simply that the format is not specified in the Definitions and that inherently, Rules will be breached when being played. If play is conducted other than in accordance with the Rules of Golf, the Rules of Golf Committee will not give a decision on any question. 'Conducted' means that the committee has determined that the R0G will not be followed not that individual players may or may not breach a rule.

Yeah... my comment was only semi-serious.  Should have added an emoticon. :doh: Since teaching golf as a profession, even if you aren't officially a PGA Pro, is a violation of amateur status, then winning too large a purse in any tournament can also violate it.  There are some indistinct lines in the area of prizes won for such things as a hole in one pot where the players contribute to the prize.  I won half of a $2400 pot when I made my first Ace, but since the pot was totally made up of voluntary player contributions, it's considered gambling, not prize money, and falls into that fuzzy boundary.  Had the pot been donated to the tournament, then it would have been prize money.  Although it seems like a large pot, the money had been collecting for 2½ years since the last winner (the voluntary contribution was $1.00 each tournament for any player who wanted a chance at the pot), and two of us aced the same hole within 20 minutes of each other in the Club Championship.

The distinction between playing for prize money, which violates the Rules of Amateur Status, and gambling, which does not, is essential to the Rules of Amateur Status. The USGA urges amateur golfers to seek USGA guidance whenever it is unclear whether the prize format constitutes playing for prize money or gambling and, in the absence of such guidance, not to play for cash prizes. Such a course of action would ensure that no one jeopardizes his amateur status.

The USGA does not object to informal gambling or wagering among individual golfers or teams of golfers when the players in general know each other, participation in the wagering is optional and is limited to the players, the sole source of all money won by the players is advanced by the players on themselves or their own teams and the amount of money involved is not generally considered excessive such that the primary purpose is the playing of the game for enjoyment.

On the other hand, organized events open to the general public and designed or promoted to create cash prizes are not approved by the USGA. Golfers participating in such events without first irrevocably waiving their right to prize money are deemed by the USGA to be playing for prize money, in breach of Rule 3-1.

The USGA is opposed to and urges its Member Clubs, all golf associations and all other sponsors of golf competitions to prohibit types of gambling such as: (1) Calcuttas, (2) other auction pools, (3) pari-mutuels and (4) any other forms of gambling organized for general participation or permitting participants to bet on someone other than themselves or their teams. The USGA may inform players they have forfeited their amateur status or deny entry in USGA Championships and membership on USGA teams for international competitions to players whose activities in connection with golf gambling, whether organized or individual, are considered by the USGA to be contrary to the best interests of golf.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4217 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.