Jump to content
Note: This thread is 3796 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I recently discovered a MacGregor Popular 2-iron and decided to give it a go. I'll start off with the pictures.

As you can see, the dimpled face is a major technological advancement. If dimples work for a golf ball, why not a golf club? Also note the seamless transition from hosel to shaft, the product of the "guaranteed hand forged" (as stated on the back of the iron) manufacturing process.

The camera had a hard time focusing in this picture, so you can't see the MacGregor logo on the left with the Popular name in the center. Near the sole of the club is the guarantee of hand forging. We can see here that this club has that classic muscleback look to it, with no cavity in the head at all. In fact, it has the opposite of a cavity and the back is convex!

This shot (again, with poor camera focus) really shows the reason this club is marketed as a "blade". You could probably spread butter with this thing, provided your tetanus shot was up to date. A very thin sole with little bounce means it'll slice right through the turf without even batting an eye.

This picture highlights the minimal offset design of the club, combined with a thin topline, to create a streamlined appearance at address. MacGregor really put their all into the visuals of this club.

First Impressions:

- The stock shaft was a bit stiff, with not much bend to it. I would prefer more options if I were to purchase an iron like this.

- The stock grip as well was terrible. Very slick with no end on it (the end of the shaft was left exposed to the elements). I would recommend regripping for all who purchase these clubs

- An intimidating looking club that was even harder to hit than it looked like. Perimeter weighting is a thing of the future with this baby! Launch it low and watch the worms dive below! This club is best used in the wind, as a mediocre strike will produce a ballflight with a peak height of around 10 feet in the air. A pure strike still only produces around 30 feet of total height.

Overall thoughts:

I would not recommend this club. Between the lack of options for both the grip and the shaft (along with the poor performance of the stock components) and the absolutely unrelenting punishment that it dishes out on a thin shot (tip: don't hit this without a thorough warmup unless your hands like to feel broken) I would say this club is not comparable to others currently available. I've also heard that it's impossible to find a golf shop that keeps them in stock.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

LOL. A friend of mine (that's a really good golfer but completely insane) showed up with one about like that one day and said he was going to use it as a putter. Funny thing was that we all made fun of him but darned if he didn't make most of his putts with it somehow. ;-) Probably was beginner's luck though because the next time I saw him he didn't have it anymore.

Nice stick! Thank god for technological advances in golf clubs! Where did you find this?.... On the titanic?

Gaz Lee


Nice stick! Thank god for technological advances in golf clubs! Where did you find this?.... On the titanic?

We have four big trash barrels full of clubs that people have left at one point or another, including an old set of Titleist blades the pro donated, that we pull out when doing junior group lessons. One kid called up saying his lost his 7-iron and, while I didn't find his club, I found this in the bottom of one of the barrels.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's awesome! My mom is an antique dealer and gets this sort of stuff once in a while. She got this sweet looking persimmon driver that I really wanted to hit, but the shaft has a split in it right hear the clubhead :-(

-Rich

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3796 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...