Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
swillis814

Blades or cavity backs

Note: This thread is 1703 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

30 posts / 2709 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Whoever it was, it must have been a long time ago. The vast majority of Tour Pros play, and win, with some form of cavity back irons these days.


You're right. I think it may have been the South African David Frost.

The thought is that the metal drivers brought the field closer to the likes of Norman, whose ability with persimmon was head and shoulders above the majority.  Do you think cavity/game improvement irons are doing a similiar thing these days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

I've been playing forged blades my entire life.  Been playing the same Titleist 690.MB blades since 2003.  I love em, but I gotta tell ya...

The new technology in the cavity backs is real...  I'm probably breaking down and getting a set of 714 AP2 Forged soon...

by the way..

Although there is a lot more variety of cavity backs and they are out there. Their technology is wonderful.

However, many still play forged blades too, like Rory McIlroy who just won the Open Championship and #1 in the world Adam Scott...Tiger Woods.. You will find all kinds...  heck I think Ben Curtis plays Titleist AP1's!  To each his own..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't played blades in years. I think cavity backs irons help shot dispersion much more than blades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been playing forged blades my entire life.  Been playing the same Titleist 690.MB blades since 2003.  I love em, but I gotta tell ya... The new technology in the cavity backs is real...  I'm probably breaking down and getting a set of 714 AP2 Forged soon...

What's "new" about the technology in the 714 AP2s?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not sure to be honest with you.. I just know I hit the AP1 and AP2 2014 iron models and was stunned with the performance. Very forgiving clubs, consistent trajectory/length with nice feel and not huge shovels.. Like I said, I'm not one to run out and buy the newest clubs every year, ive been playing my current irons for over 11 years, so anything is an upgrade in technology for me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good decision.

I've heard it cynically suggested that one reason the equipment companies flog CB instead of MB irons so hard is that once a guy finds a set of MB irons that he likes, they're awfully hard to pry out of his hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would dispersion be better with a blade?

SKOR Golf CEO Terry Koehler talks about this in the following column:

http://www.oobgolf.com/content/the+wedge+guy/golf+equipment/5-2032-Blades_Versus_Cavity_Backs_A_Golf_Club_Epiphany.html

Koehler says that tests on Iron Byron showed that center hits on blade irons were much more accurate than center hits with cavity irons. His idea: Blades reward your good hits much more than cavity irons do.

He says that good ballstrikers can benefit from blades, not just great ballstrikers. If you rarely work the ball, however, he doubts you would get much benefit from blades.

I suspect that because blades have smaller heads than SGI cavities, you could get better feel on impact with blades - less metal to absorb the vibration. I have split the distance and play GI Callaway X20 Tours, I can tell on impact what quality of shot I have with the X20 Tours; with the SGI, larger-headed X20s, I could only tell if it was a bad shot.

Also, some of you might hunt around in the Tom Wishon video clips. One segment shows a physically fit senior player who gets better launch monitor data with blade heads + lightweight steel shaft than with GI or cavity heads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just recently made the switch from MP33'S to AP2's and I didn't really have a problem with the MP33's but made decision to change based on longevity of play. I wanted to use something for a few years and decided that a little forgiveness would be nice, mostly for toe hits which is my miss occasionally. If you are happy with the MP's stay with them. I am mainly switching to end any more iron changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Loft and lie modification is something that is quite common and relatively inexpensive, especially on forged blades. At your handicap, though I think you would notice if there was a problem. Your gaps would be off if your lofts had slipped, and you would notice your ball flight if your lies were off significantly. Still, it is relatively inexpensive to get these checked and modified if necessary. As others have said, if you intend getting fitted and changed for shafts, it would probably be more economically efficient to change clubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From personal experience, I would say no. The MP33's are fine, assuming shafts and lie angle are right. If you are a 10, you should have a good idea of where your lost shots are coming from. Fairways, Greens, putting Etc.. I don't think you will see a significant difference in switching to Game Improvement irons. Plus, MP33's are sexy as hell!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1703 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • I'm not really sure why you quoted me there and then wrote this. None of this has anything to do with anything I wrote in this thread. The next time I write the word "tragic" here will be the first.
    • And you or a loved one could get killed by someone running a red light, making sudden lane changes at a high rate of speed, texting, falling asleep at the wheel or a myriad of other distractions.  If your loved one died due to these would it not be as tragic, or is it only if alcohol is somehow involved, then it makes it worse?   +1 - Once emotions get in anything bad laws are sure to follow.   Auto crashes may be the biggest threat to children, but that wouldn’t be from drunk drivers killing them.  Lots of innocent people get killed in auto crashes every year, not all are killed by drunk drivers.  I’ll pose a question to all who said yes to the post, if all drunk driving fatalities are unavoidable if the person who is drunk didn’t drive, why are there any other traffic fatalities? Obviously if you haven’t been drinking you should never get in an accident?   I don’t agree that it will save that many lives.  I believe there are something like 6,000 traffic fatalities during sunrise and sunset, when visibility is poor.  Why don’t we ban driving during these times? You’re 61% number is incorrect.  And I posted this on another thread a couple of years ago and @iacas mentioned it already, but I’ll go ever further then he did, not only are more than 50% of all alcohol-related fatalities a single car crash, killing the driver and occupants with them, but not all alcohol-related fatalities mean that the person driving was impaired.  An alcohol-related fatality is if anyone in the car has alcohol in their system.  So a Designated Driver could be in a traffic fatality with 3 drunk passengers and this is 4 people involved in an alcohol-related fatality. Or you could have a beer and some dope runs the red light hitting you and causing a fatality, but you being a driver and having alcohol in your system are probably going to be the one who goes to jail. I’m glad you’ll accept the inconvenience, I’m not.Plus you’re not going to phase out all older cars in 15 years.   Sorry for your loss, but same question as before, would you feel any different if it was a red light runner that caused the same pain?  Not to be callous, just what is the difference. As stated before, more than 50% of the 10,000 are the drivers of the vehicles.   Et tu Brute.... + A Bunch...... + A bunch More... No, my vote would not change in the least.   Most people that cause alcohol-related fatalities are people with BAC around 0.15, almost twice the legal limit.  With as many Bars, wineries, distilleries, breweries, restaurants and how prevalent alcohol is, it’s amazing how safe it is on the roads or is it really becasue it’s not as much of a threat as the media and the government make it out to be.   I think @Pretzel said it great, emotions = bad laws.  
    • A good source to look is often on eBay. While there may not be manufacture specifics, there usually is some descriptive information. I did a brief search on two items that listed the shaft flex in terms which were most likely used back when the clubs were made. One item indicated the shafts were medium/regular and another were described as regular. Your dealing with "Vintage" items which were popular long before the internet.
    • Day 22 Got to take full swings today. First time since injuring my tailbone. It felt pretty good. it will be interesting to see how I feel in the morning.  Funny, putting a ball on a tee, or plucking it out of the hole still hurts a lot. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...