Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
swillis814

Blades or cavity backs

Note: This thread is 1700 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

30 posts / 2701 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Whoever it was, it must have been a long time ago. The vast majority of Tour Pros play, and win, with some form of cavity back irons these days.


You're right. I think it may have been the South African David Frost.

The thought is that the metal drivers brought the field closer to the likes of Norman, whose ability with persimmon was head and shoulders above the majority.  Do you think cavity/game improvement irons are doing a similiar thing these days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

I've been playing forged blades my entire life.  Been playing the same Titleist 690.MB blades since 2003.  I love em, but I gotta tell ya...

The new technology in the cavity backs is real...  I'm probably breaking down and getting a set of 714 AP2 Forged soon...

by the way..

Although there is a lot more variety of cavity backs and they are out there. Their technology is wonderful.

However, many still play forged blades too, like Rory McIlroy who just won the Open Championship and #1 in the world Adam Scott...Tiger Woods.. You will find all kinds...  heck I think Ben Curtis plays Titleist AP1's!  To each his own..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't played blades in years. I think cavity backs irons help shot dispersion much more than blades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been playing forged blades my entire life.  Been playing the same Titleist 690.MB blades since 2003.  I love em, but I gotta tell ya... The new technology in the cavity backs is real...  I'm probably breaking down and getting a set of 714 AP2 Forged soon...

What's "new" about the technology in the 714 AP2s?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not sure to be honest with you.. I just know I hit the AP1 and AP2 2014 iron models and was stunned with the performance. Very forgiving clubs, consistent trajectory/length with nice feel and not huge shovels.. Like I said, I'm not one to run out and buy the newest clubs every year, ive been playing my current irons for over 11 years, so anything is an upgrade in technology for me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good decision.

I've heard it cynically suggested that one reason the equipment companies flog CB instead of MB irons so hard is that once a guy finds a set of MB irons that he likes, they're awfully hard to pry out of his hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would dispersion be better with a blade?

SKOR Golf CEO Terry Koehler talks about this in the following column:

http://www.oobgolf.com/content/the+wedge+guy/golf+equipment/5-2032-Blades_Versus_Cavity_Backs_A_Golf_Club_Epiphany.html

Koehler says that tests on Iron Byron showed that center hits on blade irons were much more accurate than center hits with cavity irons. His idea: Blades reward your good hits much more than cavity irons do.

He says that good ballstrikers can benefit from blades, not just great ballstrikers. If you rarely work the ball, however, he doubts you would get much benefit from blades.

I suspect that because blades have smaller heads than SGI cavities, you could get better feel on impact with blades - less metal to absorb the vibration. I have split the distance and play GI Callaway X20 Tours, I can tell on impact what quality of shot I have with the X20 Tours; with the SGI, larger-headed X20s, I could only tell if it was a bad shot.

Also, some of you might hunt around in the Tom Wishon video clips. One segment shows a physically fit senior player who gets better launch monitor data with blade heads + lightweight steel shaft than with GI or cavity heads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just recently made the switch from MP33'S to AP2's and I didn't really have a problem with the MP33's but made decision to change based on longevity of play. I wanted to use something for a few years and decided that a little forgiveness would be nice, mostly for toe hits which is my miss occasionally. If you are happy with the MP's stay with them. I am mainly switching to end any more iron changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Loft and lie modification is something that is quite common and relatively inexpensive, especially on forged blades. At your handicap, though I think you would notice if there was a problem. Your gaps would be off if your lofts had slipped, and you would notice your ball flight if your lies were off significantly. Still, it is relatively inexpensive to get these checked and modified if necessary. As others have said, if you intend getting fitted and changed for shafts, it would probably be more economically efficient to change clubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From personal experience, I would say no. The MP33's are fine, assuming shafts and lie angle are right. If you are a 10, you should have a good idea of where your lost shots are coming from. Fairways, Greens, putting Etc.. I don't think you will see a significant difference in switching to Game Improvement irons. Plus, MP33's are sexy as hell!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1700 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • What country do you think has the fastest pace of play? Asking for when I retire
    • 4.5 hours being considered fine is just an American view of the game  I think most Americans would find themselves unwelcome if they didnt adjust to the pace in their weekly rounds elsewhere in the world.
    • Played yesterday and today.  Didn't go so well yesterday as I shot a 106 yesterday as my driver was just all over the place and my ball striking overall left a lot to be desired.  Had 4 GIRs, however, 3 were on the front which was a general theme as shot 49 on the front and 57 on the back. Score: 106 CR/Slope: 71.6/121 2 Pars 5 Bogeys 3 DB 6 TB 1 Quad-Bogey View this round on GAME GOLF   Today I was able to bounce back and although I shot 100, I had control over my driver, was moving the ball right to left or straight off the tee and my ball striking felt better.  2 holes ended up doing me in, though.  After starting with 3 bogeys, which really should have included 1 par, and a double bogey, on the par 3 4th hole, I pushed a 7I right  and subsequently overdrew the ball on my reload and missed short and right on a brutal front right location location on a green that slopped severely from back right to front left.  Over-hit my chip shot that went all the way to the back right of the green, had to chip on and then 3 putt for an 8.  On the Par 4 14th hole, I overdrew 2 tee shots with my 3H OB.  Then chipped out, leaving myself 100 yards, took a three-quarter swing with a 52 degree wedge and left it short right.  Flag was on the front right and I thinned my chip shot, leaving it on the back left of the green.  I then 3 putt for a 10.  That said, drained a few longish putts, but my short game, putter notwithstanding, was brutal as I failed to leave myself any gimmies when chipping.  That said, had another birdie and a few pars so there are definitely positives to take away from the round. Score: 100 CR/Slope: 70.4/124 Birdie: 1 Pars: 3 Bogeys: 6 DB: 6 Others: 2 View this round on GAME GOLF 4 rounds in four days - first time I've been able to do that and it was AWESOME!  Shot 95, 95, 106, 100 so, not too shabby for me. 
    • thank you...already loaded up on TM clubs :/...that being said, I've been working on my tee shot and was wondering how much range time is too much?  have had my M2 driver for about 5 days...have hit about 250ish balls with it already...too much?
    • Yep.  Lagavulin is another.  The Isle of Islay scotches are unique.  A lot of people don’t like the peat and astringent iodine.  Good stuff, but not a beginners whisky!   
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CSkipr
      CSkipr
      (72 years old)
    2. David in FL
      David in FL
      (61 years old)
    3. LaserBeam
      LaserBeam
      (63 years old)
    4. Ratcatcher
      Ratcatcher
      (66 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...