Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2014 Tour Championship Discussion Thread


Note: This thread is 4100 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I feel bad for Ogilvy - at least in a tournament with a cut, you can stop the bleeding and try to reset back to your normal level of excellence.

I'm sure he was cool with it....$132,000 cool.

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138


Posted
I still wonder in what world sole second in the tour championship is a "loss" poor guy - probably get less that $10M - that must suck He's a fantastic golfer and had a really great season There was a comedy short about how people have come view winning and losing.  It was referencing the Olympics and how some people will call the "LOSER" (you know, the guy that came in second by 0.0001 seconds, and the guy that came in third by 0.00008 seconds) and how they make them stand on a lower pedestal, and if they are very tall, they should make him squat down.  And, if we really want to be true to our attitudes, then we really need to be honest and take the silver and bronze medalists and make them lie naked in the mud while the gold medal winner stands on their faces during his national anthem. I like to take the guy that comes in second to last and accuse them of being so bad, that they can't even lose better than the guy that came in last. I feel bad for Ogilvy - at least in a tournament with a cut, you can stop the bleeding and try to reset back to your normal level of excellence. Does anyone have the actual text of Watson's?  I think it's sad that a private text gets out.  Further, I hate that it had any mention of second guessing the Ryder team member content (even if it was just to give Billy a big compliment - I think Watson's a decent guy that way).  The team needs their caption to be showing absolute confidence in his selections so the members are absolutely confident they deserve to be there.  (However, with pro golfers, I doubt it's a problem, certainly they are think they deserve to be there - nature of the personality for sure).

Well Furyk hasn't won since 2010. And he finished second. So yeah, he lost.

Riley


Posted
There's a lot that goes into the selection for the Ryder Cup, you're playing Monday morning QB.

If that's the case, don't you think the Captain might have been better off saying so, instead of saying that he woke up on the morning he had to make decision and had a revelation. Look at what he actually said again;

“I had a revelation this morning. I looked at the last time the Ryder Cup was played and I see Webb Simpson 5&4, Webb Simpson 5&4 and I said ‘that’s got to be the guy".

That justification was the centrepiece of the decision to select Webb Simpson. It doesn't really inspire confidence to my mind.

Does anyone have the actual text of Watson's?  I think it's sad that a private text gets out.

“Why didn’t you play this well before I picked my wildcards?” - (this is the only bit I've seen quoted, and no one seems to be disputing it)

The text was made public after the second round at East Lake. At the time Horschel and Kirk were very prominent whilst Mahan and Simpson weren't (I think they were joint second last)

Now it could be of course that the text was sent after the BMW, and took some time to find its way into the public domain? that would seem logical and most likely. In any event, are we really being asked to believe that Watson was incapable of congratulating someone without framing it through the prism of the Ryder Cup?.


Posted

“Why didn’t you play this well before I picked my wildcards?” - (this is the only bit I've seen quoted, and no one seems to be disputing it)

If that's all, then I find it harmless.

It's wry and amusing and a nice note to Billy.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If that's all, then I find it harmless.

It's wry and amusing and a nice note to Billy.

I interpreted it exactly the same way.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

That justification was the centrepiece of the decision to select Webb Simpson. It doesn't really inspire confidence to my mind.

No, I took it as the final straw. He was undecided, and that pushed him over the edge. He didn't say it was the sole or even largest contributor to the decision.

“Why didn’t you play this well before I picked my wildcards?” - (this is the only bit I've seen quoted, and no one seems to be disputing it)

That's a great quote and a funny text.

Now it could be of course that the text was sent after the BMW, and took some time to find its way into the public domain? that would seem logical and most likely. In any event, are we really being asked to believe that Watson was incapable of congratulating someone without framing it through the prism of the Ryder Cup?.

Uhm… why should he? He's the Ryder Cup captain. Horschel wasn't picked, so his phrasing it that way - being as he is the Ryder Cup captain - makes it funnier and more poignant. It's relevant. I doubt he randomly texts winners of PGA Tour events - even playoffs events - to congratulate them. So that text had context you seem to feel he had a duty to ignore.

I disagree, and think you're reaching, even for you .

If that's all, then I find it harmless.

It's wry and amusing and a nice note to Billy.

I took it the same way.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Horschel may have missed the Ryder Cup for the birth of the baby anyway

Quote:

Watson has been criticized for making his picks two weeks too early, which prevented him from having the recent two-time champion on the team. But with Horschel’s wife, Brittany, expecting the couple’s first child that week, it might be a moot point anyway.

“I honestly wasn't going to play the Ryder Cup if we couldn't induce labor early,” he explained after winning the FedEx Cup. “The birth of my child – my first child – I wanted to be there for her and be there for our baby girl. But you know, when I started playing bad this year, I sort of put it out of my mind that I wasn't going to be picked. And obviously I wasn't picked, and it's going to work out perfectly.”

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Alas, "poor" Furyk ... only $708k.

Of course, Jim would love to win, but it's golf. There is only one champion, but there are many winners.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Alas, "poor" Furyk ... only $708k. Of course, Jim would love to win, but it's golf. There is only one champion, but there are many winners.

Ok fine. He's a "winner". But he hasn't been a "champion" in four years.

Riley


Posted

Ok fine. He's a "winner". But he hasn't been a "champion" in four years.


I hope he wins one soon.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4100 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.