Note: This thread is 3943 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
-
Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap
-
- 34 replies
- 1,387 views
-
- 0 replies
- 59 views
-
- 19,676 replies
- 1,485,065 views
-
- 13 replies
- 909 views
-
- 10,124 replies
- 719,415 views
-
Announcements
-
TST Partners
Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.
Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code). -
Posts
-
By GreenhornGolfer · Posted
How about with the high numbered irons such as the 9 iron? Is the swing the same with that? If that's the case then I stand corrected. OK, although there is physics involved in the putt too. -
-
-
Our public course has red penalty areas marked with red stakes. The stakes are imprecisely placed, often overgrown or missing. Our golf club has no control over how the stakes are placed. We have therefore decided to create a local rule to define the penalty areas by physical features and ignore the red stakes. Also, most of the currently marked penalty areas are because of an overgrown creek behind dense ground vegetation. The penalty areas are marked (roughly) at the edges of the dense vegetation (see picture example). Players cannot see the creek. The dense vegetation looks the same on holes where there is no creek and no penalty area. For consistency and to reduce confusion, we have decided to define all edges of dense ground vegetation as penalty area. This adopts a popular USGA recommendation from 2019. Committee Procedures 2C(2) cautions: "A Committee may define the edge of a penalty area by clearly describing it in writing but should do so only if there will be little or no doubt where the edge is. For example, where there are large areas of lava or desert that are to be treated as penalty areas, and the border between these areas and the intended general area is well defined, the Committee could define the edge of the penalty area as being the edge of the lava bed or desert." We are going ahead, but IMO "little or no doubt" is not possible. For example, the "edge of desert", no matter how "well defined" is often not a distinct line. Sand and grass may intermingle. An edge defined this way will never be as clear as stakes or a line. We will see what happens! Other comments: I believe the change will improve pace of play. And have minimal effect on handicaps. (Seems like I saw a study of this, but unable to find it again.) Does anyone have a similar experience with defining penalty areas by physical features? How did that go? -
That's a fair point. You could probably release the club without the hands slowing down at all, but you'd have to be applying a force to the hands to offset the force the club would be applying to the hands as a result of the release. Technically possible, but inefficient I would think. With a driver, the difference in radius if everything lines up straight is something like 36" vs 81" (36" arms and a 45" driver). If the hands are going at 25mph, which would be very fast, the clubhead would be moving at about 56 mph, so there is clearly a lot more going on than just the difference in radius. In the club's frame of reference, the handle is going backwards. The whole club is also moving though, so you don't see that in the static frame. The rotation of the club is demonstrable from the fact that the hands are moving slower at impact than they were at waist high as you noted. The hands and therefore the grip are slowing down and the clubhead is speeding up. That's because it's rotating.
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.