Jump to content
IGNORED

Can body type determine what swing is best to use?


RussUK
Note: This thread is 3389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I finally got to the range at the weeken after the snow and decided to concentrate on weight transfer and ball striking. I usd the drills recommended by Iacas and mvmac and although they made perfect sense they didnt seem to work (down to me, not the drills)

So after half a basket of hitting push slices and fats i was ready to pack it in. So i sat down and had a break.

It was then i remembered watching a Single Axis swing by a bloke called Kirk Junge. Similar to Moe Normans but with wrist hing and looking a little more "comfortable".


After 3-4 balls i was hitting it very nice each time so i know now that i will stick with it....the enjoyment is back!!!

So after reading about the 2 plane types i kept seeing that the theory is a 2 plane is better for those with good lower bodies and the single for those with a strong Core.

I am wondering if this is a sound theory as i was born with weakend medial tendons and anterior cruciate ligaments in my knees,which causes minor dislocations. I always seemed to struggle with the 2 plane and the stress put on my knees.

The single axis/plane just seems to suit my body type better and is more repeatable with less to worry about (especially with my legs)

Has anyone else come across this thought on the 2 swing planes?

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I finally got to the range at the weeken after the snow and decided to concentrate on weight transfer and ball striking. I usd the drills recommended by Iacas and mvmac and although they made perfect sense they didnt seem to work (down to me, not the drills)

So after half a basket of hitting push slices and fats i was ready to pack it in. So i sat down and had a break.

It was then i remembered watching a Single Axis swing by a bloke called Kirk Junge. Similar to Moe Normans but with wrist hing and looking a little more "comfortable".

After 3-4 balls i was hitting it very nice each time so i know now that i will stick with it....the enjoyment is back!!!

We are talking one range session here?  To be honest I think it is too bad that you have not seemed to take the points that are being made to you in the other thread to heart.  I have changed things in my swing on the range and have had the push fades, the shanks the hooks and every other kind of problem you can imagine for weeks after.  I take those things as a sign that I have changed something, it is not necessarily a bad sign, you are just doing something different.  It does not always happen, but you cannot allow bad results over a session to influence your decisions.  Simply put you cannot judge the results of what you are doing buy what the ball is doing at first but by the way you are or are not changing the positions in your swing through verification.

So after reading about the 2 plane types i kept seeing that the theory is a 2 plane is better for those with good lower bodies and the single for those with a strong Core.

I am wondering if this is a sound theory as i was born with weakend medial tendons and anterior cruciate ligaments in my knees,which causes minor dislocations. I always seemed to struggle with the 2 plane and the stress put on my knees.

The single axis/plane just seems to suit my body type better and is more repeatable with less to worry about (especially with my legs)

Has anyone else come across this thought on the 2 swing planes?

I don't buy it.  Please stop looking at this kind of stuff and just work at correcting your most apparent swing fault one at a time.  I also doubt you are swinging on one plane as you think you are.  You may feel like you are, but it is probably not the reality of what is going on.  You most likely reverted back to something similar to what you were doing before and the familiarity at least allowed you to make decent contact with the ball, which is not going to help you in the long run.

Nate

:tmade:(11.5) :touredge:(2H) MIURA MB-101(3-PW) :mizuno:(52/56/60)

:odyssey: :snell: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We are talking one range session here?  To be honest I think it is too bad that you have not seemed to take the points that are being made to you in the other thread to heart.  I have changed things in my swing on the range and have had the push fades, the shanks the hooks and every other kind of problem you can imagine for weeks after.  I take those things as a sign that I have changed something, it is not necessarily a bad sign, you are just doing something different.  It does not always happen, but you cannot allow bad results over a session to influence your decisions.  Simply put you cannot judge the results of what you are doing buy what the ball is doing at first but by the way you are or are not changing the positions in your swing through verification.

I don't buy it.  Please stop looking at this kind of stuff and just work at correcting your most apparent swing fault one at a time.  I also doubt you are swinging on one plane as you think you are.  You may feel like you are, but it is probably not the reality of what is going on.  You most likely reverted back to something similar to what you were doing before and the familiarity at least allowed you to make decent contact with the ball, which is not going to help you in the long run.

Thank you for your feedback Cipher, however i feel i have to respectfully disagree on sone parts. Yes, the drills may work if i had the time available to spend at the range, however golf will always be second to my family so the 7-8 times i get to play a year would be better spent actually playing.

I am very greatful for the advice given and that is now stored away for future reference, but as the saying goes "each to his own", what works for some may not work for me and vise versa.

Now as far as i am concerned the main aim of golf is simple..enjoyment. If that means hours at the range weekend after weekend grooving the perfect swing and a low handicap, then that is fine, however some people find a handicap less important. Having played for 4 years on and off due the aforemetioned condition i think maybe changes need to be made as i am ready to walk away from the game i love.

I got into the game through my Uncle, a former 2 handicap (now 5) regional ameteur player and runner up in the GB national champinship in 1969 and he has always said that it doesnt matter one bit what the swing looks like as long as it works for you and allows you to play to the level you want. i have total respect in his abilities as a self taught player. Will the swing work? only time will tell but it seems to work and the feeling was good and the enjoyment was back.

Please dont view this as confrontational as it isnt, and as i said i really appreciate the response and feedback. Its what makes this site as good as it is. And if it all goes wrong i'll be back grovelling :-)

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thank you for your feedback Cipher, however i feel i have to respectfully disagree on sone parts. Yes, the drills may work if i had the time available to spend at the range, however golf will always be second to my family so the 7-8 times i get to play a year would be better spent actually playing.

I am very greatful for the advice given and that is now stored away for future reference, but as the saying goes "each to his own", what works for some may not work for me and vise versa.

Now as far as i am concerned the main aim of golf is simple..enjoyment. If that means hours at the range weekend after weekend grooving the perfect swing and a low handicap, then that is fine, however some people find a handicap less important. Having played for 4 years on and off due the aforemetioned condition i think maybe changes need to be made as i am ready to walk away from the game i love.

I got into the game through my Uncle, a former 2 handicap (now 5) regional ameteur player and runner up in the GB national champinship in 1969 and he has always said that it doesnt matter one bit what the swing looks like as long as it works for you and allows you to play to the level you want. i have total respect in his abilities as a self taught player. Will the swing work? only time will tell but it seems to work and the feeling was good and the enjoyment was back.

Please dont view this as confrontational as it isnt, and as i said i really appreciate the response and feedback. Its what makes this site as good as it is. And if it all goes wrong i'll be back grovelling

Ultimately having fun is what it is all about.  I understand.

Nate

:tmade:(11.5) :touredge:(2H) MIURA MB-101(3-PW) :mizuno:(52/56/60)

:odyssey: :snell: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

"Can body type determine what swing is best to use?"

It would make sense right?  If you had a similar build to someone say, Kevin or Craig Stadler?  I see no reason why you couldn't research what works best for him and his body type as opposed to trying to get an Adam Scott swing with a Kevin Stadler body type...  seems like a good question.  Maybe one of the instructor can give you some info through their experience.  Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@RussUK You said you play 7-8 times a year and that family comes first. You'll never be able to groove a swing and play really good golf unless you put in the time practicing. That's the bottom line. It's the same as with learning a musical instrument. If you like to play, just go play and have fun. Realize you're going to make some bad shots, laugh 'em off, and hit your next shot. When your responsibilities decrease after your children grow up (I'm making an assumption) , you can take up the game more seriously if you want.

Learning and mastering a new method is going to take time and a lot of it. It could take years. You may hit two or three shots well with it at first, but you'll still end up having to practice and master the movements. The golf swing isn't that complicated. There are different ways of swinging a club, but you'll notice that the different ways all have certain fundamentals in common with each other. To be successful at it you have to execute these fundamentals correctly and this takes practice.

So put these other methods away. You'll only confuse yourself.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Yea it is. A gave my brother a set of cobra irons at least a decade old and he walked away with 29 dollars worth of skin money the other day. 
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...