Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2015 Valspar Championship discussion Thread


Note: This thread is 3827 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Martin View Post

46 seconds....LIKE A BOSS.

So sly.

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138


Posted

I'm going to call this a very close miss on 2015 being the year of the #deepfields.

With 2 winners that were OWGR #297 at the time of their win (Paddy & James Hahn back-to-back), the Cejka wins in Puerto Rico as #285

and at the Valspar O'Hair get into the playoff and lips a winning putt all whilst being #400.

Maybe we need a contest to pick the top performer each week from those ranked over #250?

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm going to call this a very close miss on 2015 being the year of the #deepfields. With 2 winners that were OWGR #297 at the time of their win (Paddy & James Hahn back-to-back), the Cejka wins in Puerto Rico as #285 and at the Valspar O'Hair get into the playoff and lips a winning putt all whilst being #400. Maybe we need a contest to pick the top performer each week from those ranked over #250?

Or maybe it indicates just how deep, deep really is. How genuinely good and competitive even guys 300 down in the rankings are these days.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Or maybe it indicates just how deep, deep really is. How genuinely good and competitive even guys 300 down in the rankings are these days.

That is a good point - it would be an interesting study to compare year by year, going back to the beginning of the OWGR, and see how the rankings for tournament winners compared.

I think that to do a true study, someone would have to dedicate a great deal of time to look beyond just the tournament winners; as the statistics would be skewed by the years Tiger was #1 and winning multiple tournaments.

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

#deepfields - Fabian Gomez wins from #290 in OWGR, just missing the #295 back to back winners earlier in the year

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3827 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.