Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3851 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I shot a video interview with Micheal "hammer man" Lavery

He is somewhat known around these parts for being an eccentric guy with some out there ideas about training your whole brain for golf so I had to talk to him. He has some very unique drills to improve your hand eye coordination.

I was skeptical but then impressed by what he had to say and I think it does help your golf game a lot. Check it out.


Posted

I thought it was a good interview, have you practiced it much?

Also really like your YouTube channel, really good interview with monty.


Posted

All sports have kooks but golf has the best kooks, in my humble opinion.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Mike is not that "Kooky". He looks like one when he's hammering the golf balls, maybe, but he's not that far off from what current sports science seems to be advocating?

Does anyone agree with the 3 year USGA theory? I'm a counterexample to that! I've made strong strides this last 6 months, but have been doing golf for over 4 years. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Mike is not that "Kooky". He looks like one when he's hammering the golf balls, maybe, but he's not that far off from what current sports science seems to be advocating?

Does anyone agree with the 3 year USGA theory? I'm a counterexample to that! I've made strong strides this last 6 months, but have been doing golf for over 4 years. . .

I would agree that almost any new golfer who takes up the game and just goes out and plays will hit some kind of wall after three years. I think that wall is breakable but only with instruction or some kind of coaching.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

Mike is not that "Kooky". He looks like one when he's hammering the golf balls, maybe, but he's not that far off from what current sports science seems to be advocating?

Does anyone agree with the 3 year USGA theory? I'm a counterexample to that! I've made strong strides this last 6 months, but have been doing golf for over 4 years. . .

I totally agree with the 3 year theory, but only because most golfer's don't know how to practice. The pros obviously took a lot more than 3 years to get where they are now.

  • Upvote 1

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

Mike is not that "Kooky". He looks like one when he's hammering the golf balls, maybe, but he's not that far off from what current sports science seems to be advocating?

Does anyone agree with the 3 year USGA theory? I'm a counterexample to that! I've made strong strides this last 6 months, but have been doing golf for over 4 years. . .

I totally agree with the 3 year theory, but only because most golfer's don't know how to practice. The pros obviously took a lot more than 3 years to get where they are now.

So true, but that's not what was discussed in the interview. @bdevore76 said that everyone will stagnate after 3 years. If they get to a 10 handicap in 3 years they might only get to a 9.8 or something like that someday, but not from an 18 down to a single digit or something like that. after the 3 years.

So, it makes me wonder if they are referring to talent limits or some other limit?

I have no idea what USGA is referring to as I am getting it second hand from the video, but it makes me wonder.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So true, but that's not what was discussed in the interview. @bdevore76 said that everyone will stagnate after 3 years. If they get to a 10 handicap in 3 years they might only get to a 9.8 or something like that someday, but not from an 18 down to a single digit or something like that. after the 3 years.

So, it makes me wonder if they are referring to talent limits or some other limit?

I have no idea what USGA is referring to as I am getting it second hand from the video, but it makes me wonder.

Yeah but everyone isn't a good sample because so few know how to practice. The guy who improves after years of playing seems like an outlier but your average golfer is only maintaining his game by playing once a week and pounding balls without purpose on the range.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

So true, but that's not what was discussed in the interview. @bdevore76 said that everyone will stagnate after 3 years. If they get to a 10 handicap in 3 years they might only get to a 9.8 or something like that someday, but not from an 18 down to a single digit or something like that. after the 3 years.

So, it makes me wonder if they are referring to talent limits or some other limit?

I have no idea what USGA is referring to as I am getting it second hand from the video, but it makes me wonder.

Yeah but everyone isn't a good sample because so few know how to practice. The guy who improves after years of playing seems like an outlier but your average golfer is only maintaining his game by playing once a week and pounding balls without purpose on the range.

Or maybe not even that. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3851 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.