Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3787 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

While, after hearing from too way many people my driver was seriously lacking to anything made in the past 10 years, I decided to blindly buy a used TM R7. Finally got to the range, and WOW!! Wish I made the move sooner!! Do these make these modern drivers easier to hit straight because that was the most surprising aspect to me. (2nd being the easy distance to attain vs my old driver)

My 2nd thought is that I should maybe now consider more modern woods. These are the woods I currently have from the early 90s Lynx set my dad has been allowing me to use since starting 2 months ago.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I guess we all must evolve ... the R7 is ancient, but you are getting in the ballpark.

Yes, get some modern fairways ... see callaway or taylormade preowned, 3 balls golf, rocksolidgolf, etc.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Replace the fairway woods. New ones are so much easier to hit.

DRIVER- Tour Edge EXS 220
3W- Adams Tight Lies 2
Hybrids- Cobra F8 19 *

Utility- Sub 70 699U #4
Irons - Sub 70 739 5-PW
Wedges- Tour Edge CB Pro 50, 54, 58
Putter- Cleveland Huntington Beach Soft #11

Ball- Titleist DT Trufeel


Posted

Replace the fairway woods. New ones are so much easier to hit.

When looking for fairway woods, be aware of the different modern head designs and the head's center of gravity (COG) location.

COG Position 1: Heads with a higher, more forward center of gravity will launch the ball lower, and with somewhat less spin. This creates the "low, boring shot" you see in the product ads. Players with higher swing speeds need less head-generated spin, and can get more distance with the low-spin shot.

COG Position 2: Heads with a lower, more rearward center of gravity will launch the ball higher, and with more spin. People with average swing speeds will get better distance with some spin on the ball.

Also, FW heads with a low profile (shallow face depth) will tend to launch the ball higher than larger clubheads.

Note: The FW's shaft also influences how high or low the club will launch the ball.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Made a big difference for me. Bought fixed modern then went to adjustable. Even better! Study before you buy.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

When looking for fairway woods, be aware of the different modern head designs and the head's center of gravity (COG) location.

COG Position 1: Heads with a higher, more forward center of gravity will launch the ball lower, and with somewhat less spin. This creates the "low, boring shot" you see in the product ads. Players with higher swing speeds need less head-generated spin, and can get more distance with the low-spin shot.

COG Position 2: Heads with a lower, more rearward center of gravity will launch the ball higher, and with more spin. People with average swing speeds will get better distance with some spin on the ball.

Not so sure you're right about the spin. A lower CG will effectively result in a strike more "above" the CG, which would reduce backspin.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not so sure you're right about the spin. A lower CG will effectively result in a strike more "above" the CG, which would reduce backspin.

Eric,

You are correct, if the CG is lower and forward - something increasingly common in the loft-up era. The clubhead diagram in question comes from the RBZ Stage 2 FW - pre loft-up - which came out in 2013. The RBZs2 pix only shows two possible CG locations. (I will need more than one diagram for future discussions).

Since your comment, I have located a very interesting and detailed research report on CG, done by Tutelman Group in 2013. Tutelman also identifies some other influences on spin which rarely get mentioned in golf ads.

Over the next day or two I will summarize info from Tutelman and a couple of other sources I've found to better explain CG/spin.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Eric,

You are correct, if the CG is lower and forward - something increasingly common in the loft-up era. The clubhead diagram in question comes from the RBZ Stage 2 FW - pre loft-up - which came out in 2013. The RBZs2 pix only shows two possible CG locations. (I will need more than one diagram for future discussions).

Yeah when the CG is low, that will lower spin. G30 driver is low and back and it's a high launch/low spin driver. TaylorMade likes it forward because they feel it helps increase ball speed.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3787 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.