Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3671 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, SavvySwede said:

You risk splintering the shaft that way but whatever works.

Yeah, I splintered the first one a did a little bit, but it's covered up by a piece of tape and the grip.  After that I did two more and I just didn't go all the way through ... when I got near the end, I turned it to 90* and then went smooth and slow.  Seemed to work fine.

1 hour ago, dbuck said:

Don't just whack your club off though; take it to someone that knows what they are doing, and preferably, replace the shaft instead of just cutting it. That way you can taylor the weight of the shaft to the new total weight of the club.

 

16 minutes ago, Tee2Trees said:

Cutting down the stock shaft always carries the risk of ruining the feel, to the point where you realize you can't find the center of the face anymore when all you wanted to do is improve in that area and now it's too late.  I recommend buying a second shaft with a tip adapter for your head and making it shorter and heavier than stock with a tip weight or what have you.  Use a club-fitter or buy the shaft, tip, glue, and weight on the 'bay and do it yourself.

These were not my experience.  Weight (or swingweight at least) didn't noticeably change at all, and in all three cases, the center of the face was easier to find and the feel of the club improved quite a bit.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, SavvySwede said:

You risk splintering the shaft that way but whatever works.

If you put masking tape around the shaft where you will cut it, it won't splinter when cut with a hacksaw.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
19 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

These were not my experience.  Weight (or swingweight at least) didn't noticeably change at all, and in all three cases, the center of the face was easier to find and the feel of the club improved quite a bit.

I think the key part there is that it didn't change noticeably… but it clearly would change. Simply physics. :-) (You could put a lighter weight grip on to help offset that some, too, I suppose.)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, Baog said:

If you put masking tape around the shaft where you will cut it, it won't splinter when cut with a hacksaw.

In a pinch, but there's nothing quite like having the right tool for the job. Tools are always a good investment.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am 5'7" and considered doing the same thing a while back (having received this advice to improve my drives). My instructor advised against it though citing the laws of physics (longer club/arc more speed/distance) and pointing to the LPGA players who are shorter in stature yet use the full length drivers. So I think you actually want/need the extra shaft length if you are shorter in height.

I have since improved my driving considerably with the standard length shaft by improving my swing mechanics: tempo, not coming over the top, weight shift, balanced finish..

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎11‎/‎16‎/‎2015‎ ‎9‎:‎03‎:‎07‎, SavvySwede said:

Shortened my driver shaft this year. Went down to 44.25" after a fitter's recommendation and the club feels much more in control. Probably needed a stiffer shaft as well so it was a win-win. You'll need an abrasive blade if you plan on doing it yourself in the garage.

agree ...  a dremel tool with cut off wheel works great for shortening both graphite and steel shafts.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, baw1 said:

I am 5'7" and considered doing the same thing a while back (having received this advice to improve my drives). My instructor advised against it though citing the laws of physics (longer club/arc more speed/distance) and pointing to the LPGA players who are shorter in stature yet use the full length drivers. So I think you actually want/need the extra shaft length if you are shorter in height.

I have since improved my driving considerably with the standard length shaft by improving my swing mechanics: tempo, not coming over the top, weight shift, balanced finish..

For full disclosure I am not a pro I am a hacker pretty much.  But your pro is basically saying the with a longer driver you can develop more club head speed (more speed is more kinetic energy) which can be transferred to the ball at impact.  All true but only part of the story as dynamics of the golf swing are more complex than that.  So what your pro said is true only if the only change in the dynamics is the length of the club.  I don't want to teach a physics class here but it all boils down to the "quality" of the impact with the ball or how much of club head energy can you transfer to the ball.  If you find the "sweet spot" more often with a slightly shorter club you likely will hit the ball further than before.  I could go on some with what all dynamics change with the length of the club  but the biggest contributor to how much energy is transferred to the ball (other than the ball and club designs) is finding the sweet spot.  It is entirely possible that you will hit the ball further with a shorter club just because you find the sweet spot more often.  Experiment and see what works for you.  

Just a closing note here.  A good buddy of mine has a saying "if you have to choose between straight and long, choose straight".  300 yard drives are not helpful if OB, unplayable, or make your second shot a chip out of trouble.  The game is about how many.  Just for my critics I do think 300 yard drives are great and helpful if you can control them, but until you can "pick straight". 

Butch


Note: This thread is 3671 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.