Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Transgender athletes competing in the gender they identify as


Note: This thread is 3983 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am currently watching a show called "I am Jazz" about a transgender (biologically a boy and identifies as female) youth.

While I am pro about the transgender cause, there is one particular topic that I am very torn on and that is athletics.

Jazz is not allowed to compete in sports with other girls because she was born a male.

I am curious as to what others think on this issue and hope to hear strong arguments for or against it.  As of now I believe that transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete in the sex that they identify as (or in other words opposite of their biological sex).  First and foremost I think that safety is a large issue.  There is currently concern about a transgender UFC fighter who is injuring the women that she fights.  However, this argument is less valid in non-contact sports such as golf and tennis.  Secondly, the athletic advantage (albeit strength, speed, stamina, etc.) of men over women is very prominent and thus it is 'unfair" to let these transgender athletes compete.

I am unfamiliar with men trying to hide their identity and compete in women's competitions in other sports; however, this practice is common in track and field.  In cases where these men are discovered disqualification is the obvious result.  If transgender athletes are allowed to compete in the gender they identify as could there be anyway logical means of stopping non-transgender athletes from competing across genders?

I am curious as to others opinions and insights.


Posted
I am currently watching a show called "I am Jazz" about a transgender (biologically a boy and identifies as female) youth. While I am pro about the transgender cause, there is one particular topic that I am very torn on and that is athletics. I am curious as to others opinions and insights.

Males typically have an advantage in many sports. I'm not against transgender people. However not being able to compete in the sport you want because of the unfair advantage in terms of physical ability due to growing up as as a male in my opinion would most likely be a required sacrifice for a transgender person.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

makes sense to me with regard to prohibition from competing in girls sports.    Aside from the physical strength advantages of being biologically a male, the whole locker room thing would be an obstacle.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

makes sense to me with regard to prohibition from competing in girls sports.    Aside from the physical strength advantages of being biologically a male, the whole locker room thing would be an obstacle.

Why would the locker room be an obstacle if the person that was transgender was taking the necessary hormones and underwent surgical procedures to anatomically reflect the gender they identify with?   I don't believe a transgender who hasn't taken hormone treatments and been through the surgical process should be able to compete as a female under any circumstances but I don't think this is what the OP was addressing.

This is something sports are going to have to deal with as it's only a matter of time before the case is made they are being discriminated against by not being allowed to compete in sports.

In the case of MMA, I believe the fighters name is Fallon Fox, and she just recently lost her fourth fight in a row to female MMA fighters so the case could be made she doesn't have any advantage having been born a man or she's just a really bad fighter.

I would argue that in many cases a transgender taking female hormones is at a greater disadvantage than a female fighter taking male hormones.  Cris Cyborg dominated woman's MMA a few years ago until she tested positive for steroids.   Overall as long as proper testing is done for PED's and assurances are made that female and transgender competitors are within the proper ranges they should be allowed to compete imo.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This is something sports are going to have to deal with as it's only a matter of time before the case is made they are being discriminated against by not being allowed to compete in sports.

I think sports has the case that even though they identify themselves as male or female. The fact remains they are genetically male or female even with hormone treatment.

In the end, even though Transgender people can now have a medical procedure done. In fact that is a choice they have to make. In some regards they could just live their lives as the gender they were born with.

In the case of MMA, I believe the fighters name is Fallon Fox, and she just recently lost her fourth fight in a row to female MMA fighters so the case could be made she doesn't have any advantage having been born a man or she's just a really bad fighter.

Wiki has her at 6 wins and 1 loss in her career.

Many female fighters have said there is a significant difference in fighter her. Ronda Rousey has voiced her opinion that she would not fight Fox.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah, the locker room thing isn't an issue. Which sports division they should compete in is a tough question though. I recall coming across studies that showed male to female trans people had negligible physical advantages once hormone therapies concluded but I'm sure it's early in that research. Also what constitutes a full hormonal transition isn't a standardized thing. So it's something that'll require a lot of further study to be able to create objective criteria for. I don't have a good answer on this matter but we need to find one.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Originally Posted by inthehole

makes sense to me with regard to prohibition from competing in girls sports.    Aside from the physical strength advantages of being biologically a male, the whole locker room thing would be an obstacle.

Why would the locker room be an obstacle if the person that was transgender was taking the necessary hormones and underwent surgical procedures to anatomically reflect the gender they identify with?


I haven't seen the show, but my thinking was as a high school kid, she wouldn't have had "the operation" yet, thus my comment about the locker room being a huge issue, which it undeniably would be if she hasn't yet had the operation.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Males typically have an advantage in many sports. I'm not against transgender people. However not being able to compete in the sport you want because of the unfair advantage in terms of physical ability due to growing up as as a male in my opinion would most likely be a required sacrifice for a transgender person.

I completely agree with everything you have stated here.  Very concise and well put.  The part I have bolded is where I think the process with this issue will get tricky.  Compromising is usually something that the transgender cause is trying to avoid (and rightfully so in most instances).

makes sense to me with regard to prohibition from competing in girls sports.    Aside from the physical strength advantages of being biologically a male, the whole locker room thing would be an obstacle.

I use to think that the locker room/bathroom situation was a problem; however as I learned more about transgender people I realized that it makes more sense for them to use the locker room they identify with.  They aren't transgender to get to go into locker rooms and see other people, they are transgender because they actually identify with the opposite sex, therefore it is likely more of a problem to have them use the locker room of their biological sex.

In the case of MMA, I believe the fighters name is Fallon Fox, and she just recently lost her fourth fight in a row to female MMA fighters so the case could be made she doesn't have any advantage having been born a man or she's just a really bad fighter.

One of the arguments made by Jazz's parents on the show about letting her compete in women's sports was that she is not a great player and a non-agressive athlete.  I feel like this is a poor argument and ability can't really be used as a justifier.  We don't have boys who are poor athletes growing up play in girls sports leagues.


Posted

I think sports has the case that even though they identify themselves as male or female. The fact remains they are genetically male or female even with hormone treatment.

In the end, even though Transgender people can now have a medical procedure done. In fact that is a choice they have to make. In some regards they could just live their lives as the gender they were born with.

Wiki has her at 6 wins and 1 loss in her career.

Many female fighters have said there is a significant difference in fighter her. Ronda Rousey has voiced her opinion that she would not fight Fox.

You are right Matt, she lost her fourth pro fight by TKO.  Ronda has been outspoken on Fallon but no more so than she has on Cris Cyborg who used PED's.  Ronda likes to have the size and strength advantage in her fights.  She's the champ so she has no reason to fight these women until they win enough fights to justify a title shot.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You are right Matt, she lost her fourth pro fight by TKO.  Ronda has been outspoken on Fallon but no more so than she has on Cris Cyborg who used PED's.  Ronda likes to have the size and strength advantage in her fights.  She's the champ so she has no reason to fight these women until they win enough fights to justify a title shot.

Or Ronda could like to maintain the integrity of the sport.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Or Ronda could like to maintain the integrity of the sport.

I don't buy that, I believe Ronda would like to maintain the integrity of her bank account and celebrity status.  If a fight with Cyborg or Fox would make her enough money she'd take it.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's a huge advantage for transgender (male to female) to compete against women, much more than the effect steroid would have.   I don't think it should be allowed.  Rather, they should have their own competition.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I use to think that the locker room/bathroom situation was a problem; however as I learned more about transgender people I realized that it makes more sense for them to use the locker room they identify with.  They aren't transgender to get to go into locker rooms and see other people, they are transgender because they actually identify with the opposite sex, therefore it is likely more of a problem to have them use the locker room of their biological sex.

It seems you're only thinking of the transgender person.  What about the rest of the people in the locker room (who in some instances could be children)?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It seems you're only thinking of the transgender person.  What about the rest of the people in the locker room (who in some instances could be children)?

What about them?  I don't follow what you're getting at.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
What about them?  I don't follow what you're getting at.

Imagine you have a 14 year old male who is a transgender (i.e. he feels his 'gender expression', female, does not match his biologically assigned physical sexuality, male).  He doesn't take female hormones, he hasn't had sex change surgery.  From physical appearances when naked he looks 100% male.  He showers in the female locker room at school after P.E. class in an open shower room with 13 and 14 year old girls.

That's what I'm getting at.  Wouldn't there be a concern by some of the female children and some of their parents in this situation?  Shouldn't they be taken into consideration?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Shouldn't they be taken into consideration.

If my daughter is in there...!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Imagine you have a 14 year old male who is a transgender (i.e. he feels his 'gender expression', female, does not match his biologically assigned physical sexuality, male).  He doesn't take female hormones, he hasn't had sex change surgery.  From physical appearances when naked he looks 100% male.  He showers in the female locker room at school after P.E. class in an open shower room with 13 and 14 year old girls.

That's what I'm getting at.  Wouldn't there be a concern by some of the female children and some of their parents in this situation?  Shouldn't they be taken into consideration?

Moreso than the lesbian gym teacher?

Also, I don't think just saying "I identify as a girl" qualifies you as a transgender.  I had a lot of friends in high school that would have attempted that solely to get into the girls locker room.

As far as the thread topic goes ... I just don't know.  Well, as far as those born men who are transitioning to women.  I imagine nobody thinks the other way around is much of a problem.  This makes me think of the end of The Incredibles .  The little kid (who is a superhero with speed as his power) is running track and has to come in second so as not to rouse the rabblers.  Any transgender females who compete against born women are not going to cause any problems if they fit in with the masses ... but if they stand out and dominate?  That's gonna be a big problem.

Here's the video:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not sure this is related but we (I) faced this concern in adult softball where men would try and play in the women's league 20 years ago and we would have to try and rule on it at game or tournament time. There is an unfare advantage on most cases. Today, women can play in men's league in some cities, but men cannot play in the women's league. Play coed and be safe! It's a safety thing in some sports.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3983 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.