Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3944 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Don't apologize. You simply participated in a debate amongst men about a topic that is of utmost importance in our lives - how we relate to women.

Now that this thread is in the OT section I feel as though I can respond to some of your thoughts from earlier.

In the original thread you called me out on a few statements I made regarding "leading" and the difference between what a woman says she wants and what she actually wants. Admittedly, those statements did not come across as I had intended because i knew it was off-topic and out of respect for Erik and this site I get very uneasy when things go OT.

As human beings we crave leadership. There are numerous studies that show our instinctual tendency to defer to authority figures, etc. Groups, families, nations, etc. that find themselves with a vacuum of leadership often find themselves in trouble. This explains Trump's popularity, in a field of apologetic softies he comes across as a powerful leader, and people flock to this despite disagreeing with his policies and views.

When it comes to families it is no different. There must be leadership. A family must have a leader, someone who points the family in the desired moral direction. Can this be the wife? Sure it can, but women are nurturers by nature, not leaders. Some embrace the role of leading a family, but most will subconsciously resent this role eventually. This is all supported by studies that show women leaders are simply not very happy. The large climb up the corporate ladder has left many women shocked to find it isn't all that great up there.

Now by "leading" I don't mean telling your wife what to do, think, etc. This isn't about that at all. It isn't a "my way or the highway" type of leadership. Rather it is about setting the tone for your marriage and family. You likely chose your wife because she shared your values, that in itself is your fist act of leadership, you weren't going to start a family with someone that didn't want to follow your moral path, correct?

As for women saying one thing and meaning another, again, there are studies (I'll have to look them up) that show women describing their perfect mate as "nice" and "agreeable", etc. etc. yet when shown pictures of men they'd like to date they choose the ones with facial features that match closely with narcissism and psychopathy - in other words the "bad boy". So when a woman says she wants a "sensitive, nice guy" that is her logical brain speaking, and she isn't being dishonest. However, at a more primal, evolutionary level she craves a strong man that makes her feel safe, that will protect her and her children. And who is likely to do that? Right, the muscular guy who isn't afraid to be disagreeable and ruffle some feathers. The classic "jerk" or "bad boy".

I hope you can now better understand where I am coming from with those statements, they were not meant to be misogynistic and I certainly don't claim to have all of the answers. These are simply theories relating to human behavior that I have observed to have some truth to them.

The attacks are unnecessary and really just show poor emotional control on the part of the attackers. Men having an intellectual discussion about human behavior, nothing wrong with that, but taking it personally and attacking is wrong. You took the attacks well, cheers

Being that I am usually the long winded one, I will keep this short and sweet.  Your explanation does clarify previous points. Thank you.  As previously stated, we are all on the this journey called life, it includes relationships and there are many roads to choose and go down.  We can't all go down the same one but we can all agree that we will try our best to do so with dignity and have positive experiences and relationships along the way.

Have a great weekend Braivo

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The attacks are unnecessary and really just show poor emotional control on the part of the attackers. Men having an intellectual discussion about human behavior, nothing wrong with that, but taking it personally and attacking is wrong. You took the attacks well, cheers :beer:

It's interesting that all of those people jumped to the conclusion that I had some kind of bitterness or bad experiences yet I never said the same about them: that they have sexless marriages and are lashing out because what we are saying hits a little too close to home.....hmmmmmm. But I wouldn't do that because how would I know? They can have opinions without actually having first hand experience.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's interesting that all of those people jumped to the conclusion that I had some kind of bitterness or bad experiences yet I never said the same about them: that they have sexless marriages and are lashing out because what we are saying hits a little too close to home.....hmmmmmm.

But I wouldn't do that because how would I know? They can have opinions without actually having first hand experience.

How long have you been married Duff and how many kids do you have?

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's interesting that all of those people jumped to the conclusion that I had some kind of bitterness or bad experiences yet I never said the same about them: that they have sexless marriages and are lashing out because what we are saying hits a little too close to home.....hmmmmmm.

But I wouldn't do that because how would I know? They can have opinions without actually having first hand experience.

How long have you been married Duff and how many kids do you have?

A humurous way of Just sayin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43XEbiTOwuI

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
How long have you been married Duff and how many kids do you have?

7 years, two kids, 6 and almost 2 Married for 5 years plus 2 years of dating for my first marriage.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

7 years, two kids, 6 and almost 2

Married for 5 years plus 2 years of dating for my first marriage.

I'm not going to knock what you're saying but 5 years doesn't make you an expert in relationships.  When you get to 25-30 years and your kids are grown and out of the house then you can say you've found a secret.  5 years still qualifies as "honeymoon period" but I'm glad things are going well for you. :beer:

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A humurous way of Just sayin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43XEbiTOwuI

Exactly

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Being that I am usually the long winded one, I will keep this short and sweet.  Your explanation does clarify previous points. Thank you.  As previously stated, we are all on the this journey called life, it includes relationships and there are many roads to choose and go down.  We can't all go down the same one but we can all agree that we will try our best to do so with dignity and have positive experiences and relationships along the way.

Have a great weekend Braivo

It wouldn't be very fun to discuss if we all had the same opinions.

Thanks Gator. You have quickly become one of my favorite guys to interact with on here, looking forward to future discussions on different topics.

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
As human beings we crave leadership. There are numerous studies that show our instinctual tendency to defer to authority figures, etc. Groups, families, nations, etc. that find themselves with a vacuum of leadership often find themselves in trouble. This explains Trump's popularity, in a field of apologetic softies he comes across as a powerful leader, and people flock to this despite disagreeing with his policies and views.

I don't think I agree with this at all.  Humans don't crave leadership (well, maybe a few do), they simply dislike indecisiveness.  In fact, I think people dislike indecisiveness more than they dislike bad decisions.

I think just about everyone expects Trump to lay some real decision making eggs if he were to be elected, but they also know he's not gonna stand there with his thumb up his butt.  There is significant appeal in that.

Anyway, what it all boils down to is confidence.  Both men and women think confidence is attractive and as a leader it's impossible to lead without possessing some level of confidence regardless of gender.


Posted
I don't think I agree with this at all.  Humans don't crave leadership (well, maybe a few do), they simply dislike indecisiveness.  In fact, I think people dislike indecisiveness more than they dislike bad decisions. I think just about everyone expects Trump to lay some real decision making eggs if he were to be elected, but they also know he's not gonna stand there with his thumb up his butt.  There is significant appeal in that. Anyway, what it all boils down to is confidence.  Both men and women think confidence is attractive and as a leader it's impossible to lead without possessing some level of confidence regardless of gender.

Excellent point. Replace leadership with confidence and assertiveness and you probably get closer to the truth. My first post in this thread was making this exact point, that wives don't like indecisive husbands. Make decisions.

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3944 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.