Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Pros without caddies?


Note: This thread is 3719 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I too like to see the end of caddies in tours even just for a tournament.  Let the players carry their own bag or ride cart.  Let's see the impact of playing without caddies.  Who'd emerge as best players?   Would the pace be faster?  Will the putting stat go down?  

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 5 November 2015 at 14:03:35, RussUK said:

Like @Baog said the pro's do have to carry their own bags in many of the lower tours such as the EuroPro tour and Jamega Tour in the UK. They do however seem to use trolleys most of the time. To be fair, the prize money is so low a hiring a caddie probably isnt worthwhile.

I frequently practice with a guy who played Europro the past year. I've seen him play with a caddie (he's one of the very few there with a full-time caddy) and without, seems to do fine either way. He's currently sitting 3rd place in one of the European Tour Q School stage 2 tournaments (of 3 stages) with a caddy but I've seen him go low without. He's fit enough that I don't think that side of it matters - when we play together we both carry and it's me breathing a bit walking up some of the steeper holes, not him :-) 

Pete Iveson

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The fact that they can get used to it, or that they've done it in the past, or that lower-level pros do it, is sort of beside the point, IMO.  Of course they can do it.  The more interesting question is what effect it would have on the quality of golf being played.  I think to say that they would play just as well basically assumes that caddies add no value--performance wise--doesn't it? 

 

 

I suppose there is some marginal value in having someone to talk through the shots and reads.  More things to focus on might mean more mental mistakes.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, dsc123 said:

The more interesting question is what effect it would have on the quality of golf being played.  I think to say that they would play just as well basically assumes that caddies add no value--performance wise--doesn't it?

Agreed.   Why would the players pay caddies 5 - 10% of their winning + about $1000/day (educated guess) if all they are doing is carrying bags?   Why players change caddies at all, seek out better ones, etc?    Reading greens, course management are part of golf game that I expect the player is solely responsible for.   Having caddies who can read greens betters, advise on every shot makes pro golf a team sport IMO. 

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

While I said I don't think it would make much of a difference, on rethinking it, imho, I don't think you'll see a difference short term. Over the long term, the whole season, perhaps it adds up. Mentally. Your right hand man and game confidante takes a little pressure off... everything. If there's a very rough analogy to work, he's kind of like the manager that shields you from all the political bull***t so you can put your head down and get your work done.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 hours ago, nevets88 said:

While I said I don't think it would make much of a difference, on rethinking it, imho, I don't think you'll see a difference short term. Over the long term, the whole season, perhaps it adds up. Mentally. Your right hand man and game confidante takes a little pressure off... everything. If there's a very rough analogy to work, he's kind of like the manager that shields you from all the political bull***t so you can put your head down and get your work done.

I'd go with that. I also think there's a big difference in how much players depend on their caddy. At one point I saw Robert Rock's caddy used to stand looking down the line of the putt and literally tell him if he was aiming right, stepping aside just before the stroke to technically stay within the rules at the time (personal opinion was it was pushing it a bit...... possibly more than a bit) while at the other end of the spectrum I've heard Poulter basically say he just needs a caddy to check that he's not made a glaring error in calculating his own yardage etc. and be on the same wave length as him. The implication seemed to be he pretty much takes care of game management himself. 

Personally I wouldn't want to see caddies go - I like the interaction and it often gives an insight into what the player is thinking looking at a given shot.

Pete Iveson

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

At the end of the tournament I want to know who played the best golf, not who carried his clubs with the least effect.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3719 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.