Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3811 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have traveled extensively for the last 5 yrs for business using rental cars (Philly to DC), and have always used the same Avis location. During that time, their service has gone from enthusiastic first name greetings (both ways), where I didn't need to show my license or credit card and just verbally told them the final mileage upon return, to always not knowing the person behind the counter, being greeted with "hello sir", having to show my credentials, and waiting while they went to check the mileage in spite of the fact that I tell them.

I received a request for a satisfaction survey from Avis and couldn't wait. I copied my reply when they asked why I gave them a '4' overall:

Treat and pay your employees better. I have been in the workplace for 40 years as a worker and manager, and I can recognize beaten down spirits when I see it. I have been renting from this particular location for many years, and recently I have seen many many workers come and go in quick succession. The high turnover is a very revealing sign. Pay your executive managers less, pay your front line workers more, and treat them like human beings. You will then start to see better response from your customers. It really is that simple.

These are the exact same symptoms as at the workplace I just left. Horrible morale, and abusive management. When will upper management ever learn you can't get good performance by paying themselves exorbitant salaries and beating on the front line workers? That old joke is very apt: "The beatings will continue until morale improves". You get good performance by nurturing, mentoring, and taking care of your front line workers. Working people are not ants or drones.

dak4n6


  • Moderator
Posted
12 hours ago, dak4n6 said:

Pay your executive managers less, pay your front line workers more, and treat them like human beings. You will then start to see better response from your customers. It really is that simple.

This is a good point you bring up. A lot of companies see their low level employees as interchangeable because they tend to come and go. While these types of jobs will generally have a higher turnover rate than more career-oriented positions, part of the problem is self-fulfilling prophecies. They tend to treat these people as expendable because that's how they view the positions and the employees feel unappreciated as a result.

Low level employees are important in the service industry. They're the faces of your company. Customers interact with front line workers, not high level executives.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Completely agree with the OP.   Not just in what is considered lower level service jobs.   The division I work for in a large company has made it very clear from upper management that people are fungible and expendable and that they don't think that people will make more money elsewhere.    They were wrong  

Headcount is down 25% - 40% in a lot of areas.  And it's harder to get things done, a lot of experience left the building.   

The situation with Avis that is described above is typical in a lot of places.  People who were there longer made more money, typically, so to reduce costs they were let go or forced out.  People that don't know it as well are hired and the entire level of service goes down.  Very sad.  

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yep. Take care of your employees, and they will take care of your customers. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, Patch said:

Yep. Take care of your employees, and they will take care of your customers. 

Eh.

Not to you in particular, but there's obviously a contrary point to be made. I don't go to McDonald's expecting incredible service. I go because (ostensibly) I know what I'm going to get with the food and it'll be relatively inexpensive.

Pay the low-level people more and you're going to have to charge customers more (or make less money, but good luck with that one). I'd often rather trade service for savings, because I don't really let the brief service interactions I have greatly affect my life, while a 10% or even 5% increase in the cost of the services would affect my life.

I appreciate good service, but often, for stupid stuff like this, I'm not willing to pay a lot more for it. McDonald's employees, Avis counter agents… they're not doing anything special. There's no real skill set there. Why should they make $35k/year? More?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3811 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.