Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3490 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

I dunno, is golf 10 years behind like DeChambeau said? Every Shot Counts was written, what, two years ago? But Broadie started doing analysis way before he wrote the book. When did moneyball start happening for baseball?  Michael Lewis' Moneyball was written in 2003. OK, maybe he's right.

Quote

“I’m telling you right now, we are 10 years behind every other sport,” said Bryson DeChambeau, a PGA Tour rookie and one of the game’s wonkiest players. “And I feel like we’re at the forefront of all this technology, all this information, all this stuff that can allow us to play better.”

...

Now, after turning pro last month, DeChambeau is working with Microsoft, the Tour’s operating system and analytics partner, to develop technology that could help him understand, among other things, the relationship between grip pressure and shot quality and how to read greens in a more scientific way.

“There are things he would like to measure that there are no solutions for on the market,” said Mike Downey, Microsoft’s principal evangelist for sports. Downey has talked to some other players, but with DeChambeau, the brainstorming sessions have gone on for hours.

“There are analytics that can allow players to play better,” DeChambeau said. “Will everyone use it? No. They don’t think it’s necessary. They rely on their feel way too much and they trust that more.”

http://www.wsj.com/articles/golfers-join-rest-of-world-use-data-1463434676?tesla=y

FYI: WSJ links are iffy. If the full article isn't coming up, you can always google the article title and the link will lead to the full article.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote

Broadie also sends weekly reports to Colin Swatton, the caddie and swing coach for world No. 1 Jason Day, detailing how past tournaments on a given course have been won. Swatton uses the reports to set goals for every hole, which can influence how aggressively Day plays. But using data to assess the risk-reward of a given shot is still uncommon.

Maybe @iacas should send a copy of LSW to Jason Day :whistle:

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Could this also be a case of missing the forest for the trees?  I understand Snedeker choosing tournaments/courses that fit his game better; that just seems like common sense.  But grip pressure?  Is The Hat going to claim that he can accurately apply -- with his hands -- 6psi for drives but only 4.75psi for approaches?  Or is he going to freeze over the ball trying to do differential equations for accurate sphincter pressure on half-swing 56 deg. wedge shots?

 

  • Upvote 1

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, nevets88 said:

I dunno, is golf 10 years behind like DeChambeau said? Every Shot Counts was written, what, two years ago? But Broadie started doing analysis way before he wrote the book. When did moneyball start happening for baseball?  Michael Lewis' Moneyball was written in 2003. OK, maybe he's right.

It's interesting that ShotLink data became publicly available in 2005...I would guess that this was a direct result of the popularity of Moneyball.

Until recently, with the advent of player-tracking (NBA/NFL) and ball-tracking (MLB) systems, sabermetrics in the other major sports was a process of "repackaging" existing data in new ways. That analysis could be used retroactively, to assign - for example - a Wins-Over-Replacement value to Babe Ruth.

In golf, the problem was a bit different...the traditional stats were "counting" stats (drive distance, fairways hit) that limited analysts' ability to repackage them.  Until the new data (ShotLink) came along, I would argue that there was less that could be done with traditional golf stats, other than being able to accurately compare players from different eras.

  • Upvote 1

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3490 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.