Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3156 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All, 

Relatively new to the world of golf (Played a few social rounds with mates whilst in the UK, golfing in Manchester never appealed to me funnily enough!) but have since relocated to Kenya and have taken up the sport. 1600m above sea level really helps your length off the tee plus the weather helps! 

So I've played approx 5 rounds so far over the past 6 weeks using the pro's Cleveland TA3 Forged Irons. I have heard so much about high handicappers shouldnt start using blade / cavity back clubs but I love the feel you get off these clubs when you hit it right.......its just the times when you don't where the issue falls down. 

Now I have been offered to buy these irons 3-PW for around $100 which seems pretty reasonable as buying modern equipment out here is so expensive and I dont want to spunk loads of money on new GI technology in my first year. 

Question to you guys - How many of you guys started out as beginners using more advanced clubs and did it make you a better player in the long run? I really want to master this game and part of the enjoyment I have been getting in seeing how much control / accuracy I can get with these blades. 

To put it into perspective I am giving myself 26 shots on each round and last time out I shot -2 under my handicap. I'm a 30 year old lad who played cricket and hockey at a decent level so have an understanding on the principles of impact....however inside 100 yards I am awful! 

My goal for the end of the year is bogey golf with one or two blow up holes to be expected. 

Thanks in advance!


Posted

I am very familiar with the Cleveland TA3 irons.  That was a top-shelf club in the day, so that price is pretty reasonable.

When I took up the game in the late 1970s you could choose any type of club that you wanted...as long as it was a muscleback blade.  There was no such thing as game improvement irons at that time, so I had to learn with traditional gear, and so did everybody else.  It's very difficult to say if it made me a better player than if I had started with more forgiving clubs.  I can tell you that I've always used blades or "player's cavity backs" similar to the TA3, but may have been more comfortable with oversized irons if that's what I grew up with.

Having said that, with my experience in golf retail and as an equipment tech, I can't think of a situation where I would recommend that a beginner learn to play with a set of blades.  I just think there are better options now that make more sense.  However, in your situation with where you live and the lack of equipment options, I won't try to talk you out of it either.

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't know that I would talk you out of it either..   but, I imagine it would do 1 or 2 things pretty quickly.  

A) learn to become a pretty solid ball striker pretty quickly

or

B) give up the game of golf..  

 

 

:tmade:  - SIM2 - Kuro Kage silver 60 shaft
:cobra:  - F9 3W, 15 degree - Fukijara Atmos white tour spec stiff flex shaft

:tmade: - M2 hybrid, 19 degree
:tmade: - GAPR 3 iron - 18degree
:mizuno: MP-H5 4-5 iron, MP-25 6-8 iron, MP-5 9-PW

Miura - 1957 series k-grind - 56 degree
:bettinardi: - 52 degree
:titleist: - Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Putter

check out my swing here

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 hours ago, lastings said:

I don't know that I would talk you out of it either..   but, I imagine it would do 1 or 2 things pretty quickly.  

A) learn to become a pretty solid ball striker pretty quickly

or

B) give up the game of golf..  

 

 

Thanks for the advice - It's definitely not going to be option B) as I said I am really enjoying getting into the sport plus I'm one of those people that doesn't quit easily.

I think I will get these clubs for now and I have a trip back home to the UK planned in August where I should be able to pick up some modern irons as I also need to get a Driver / Woods as they aren't part of the set. 

Like I said over the past few weeks I have been scoring around 45/47 on the front 9 of my local course (Par35). When I get hold of the thing its so straight and consistent with grouping, only issue is the bad shots. Finding striking the 3/4 iron off the deck really hard work.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Posted
5 hours ago, jonathand257 said:

 Finding striking the 3/4 iron off the deck really hard work.

You and me both, brother. 

:tmade:  - SIM2 - Kuro Kage silver 60 shaft
:cobra:  - F9 3W, 15 degree - Fukijara Atmos white tour spec stiff flex shaft

:tmade: - M2 hybrid, 19 degree
:tmade: - GAPR 3 iron - 18degree
:mizuno: MP-H5 4-5 iron, MP-25 6-8 iron, MP-5 9-PW

Miura - 1957 series k-grind - 56 degree
:bettinardi: - 52 degree
:titleist: - Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Putter

check out my swing here

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If you can find them, TA5 or TA6 cast irons would be a better buy, I think. Shot my lowest scores ever with the TA5's. See Maltby Playability factor for these clubs compared to the TA3's. On the other hand, I play Mizuno cavity-back forged clubs most of the time nowadays. Not the best MPF rating either, but we love the feel of forged, don't we? Good luck in your search and in golf. -Marv

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, MarvChamp said:

If you can find them, TA5 or TA6 cast irons would be a better buy, I think. Shot my lowest scores ever with the TA5's. See Maltby Playability factor for these clubs compared to the TA3's. On the other hand, I play Mizuno cavity-back forged clubs most of the time nowadays. Not the best MPF rating either, but we love the feel of forged, don't we? Good luck in your search and in golf. -Marv

 

Thanks so much for this Marv - I'd never heard of MPF before today, really interesting stuff. TA3 comes in at 394 which is classic.

My interest in golf was reignited when I sponsored the Irish Society golf tournament over here and invited a few potential clients to play, no wonder they gave me odd looks when I rock up with a set of these and no driver!

I'm away to play 18 this morning and will probably decide this weekend whether to pull the trigger. There is something beautiful about blades though when you line them up behind the ball as a apposed to some of the awful looking modern clubs out there (I have been away from the sport 5 years or so) 

I might try and located some TA5/6's on my next trip back to the UK or even SA. 

Enjoy your golf gents. 


Posted

Wi

1 hour ago, jonathand257 said:

 

There is something beautiful about blades though when you line them up behind the ball as a apposed to some of the awful looking modern clubs

Without wanting to sound like a dick, Cleveland TA3s are far from being blades. They are "compact" perimeter weighted irons, which is the antithesis of a blade. :-)

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

Not at all - Like I said I am a newb to this sport and 4 weeks ago I didn't even know what a blade was....however without getting bogged down in semantics its fair to say they aren't a beginners club. 

Shot 43 on the front 9 (par 35) and 51 on the back 9 (par 35 also) which I am pretty happy with as no 8's in the round and plenty of the doubles could have been converted to bogeys if my putting wasn't so gash (using a Callaway Tuttle putter which I love!!)

Thanks for all your advice, I have bought them for $100 and will see how they see me through until August time. 

Happy golfing over the Easter weekend! 

 

 


Posted
9 hours ago, jonathand257 said:

Thanks so much for this Marv - I'd never heard of MPF before today, really interesting stuff. TA3 comes in at 394 which is classic.

Yes, it is a good tool, but really it is just that. At the end of the day, how you personally relate to a club is what matters. For example, I do hit my Mizuno MX200's as well as or better than I did my TA6's, maybe due to the shafts. And, as was said, TA3's are not blades. All the older TA line were cavity back, perimeter weighted clubs, some with a wider sole than others, if I recall. You seem to be playing the TA3's just fine. The search for clubs that make you soar is one of the great enjoyments in golf. Best wishes in all aspects of this great game. -Marv

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/13/2017 at 5:22 PM, 1badbadger said:

When I took up the game in the late 1970s you could choose any type of club that you wanted...as long as it was a muscleback blade.  There was no such thing as game improvement irons at that time, so I had to learn with traditional gear, and so did everybody else. ...

I was in the same boat... played MacGregor MT irons from 1974 to 1994. Even broke 80 a couple of times.

Here's what I noticed: In seasons when I could play 18 six times a month, a generally shot in the mid- to upper-80s. In seasons when I played only twice a month, I was inconsistent with my irons and seldom broke 90. The Mb/blade/Players irons require you to have a stable swing and keep it in tune in order to do well with them.

As per a very good teaching pro I know, "Get clubs for the swing you have today, not for the swing you hope to have next year."

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3156 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.