Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

 I am looking to upgrade my driver.  I currently use An x-hot  Driver with a 10.5 loft. I skyball a lot so 9.5 or lower would be better I think. I swing 110mph club head and fade my balls.  My first question is does anyone have any experience with the Xr or XR Pro.  My second question is what is the difference between low spin and regular drivers. 


Posted

The XR spins a bunch ... You'd be better off going to the next upgrade - the XR16 or XR16 Pro.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ima take a guess here that hitting the sky ball is a swing issue and not a club issue

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use a xr16. I tried both the xr16 and the xr16 Pro. The xr16 has a slightly larger head size and therefore I'm assuming a bigger sweet spot. I hit them both about the same, I chose to buy the xr16

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/6/2017 at 2:53 PM, Mr. Desmond said:

The XR spins a bunch ... You'd be better off going to the next upgrade - the XR16 or XR16 Pro.

If you really have 110 MPH clubhead speed - make sure the shop didn't juice the launch monitor - you might try the XR16 Pro. It has a heavier shaft, and the clubhead keeps the ball lower.

If a recheck shows your speed isn't that high, the XR16 might be the way to go.

Either way, get a fitting at a good golf shop. It's often free if you buy a new (i.e., unused) driver.
--------------------------------------------

Parallel idea: Have you had a lesson recently? The skyballs might have more to do with ball position and swing plane than driver loft.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, WUTiger said:

If you really have 110 MPH clubhead speed - make sure the shop didn't juice the launch monitor - you might try the XR16 Pro. It has a heavier shaft, and the clubhead keeps the ball lower.

If a recheck shows your speed isn't that high, the XR16 might be the way to go.

Either way, get a fitting at a good golf shop. It's often free if you buy a new (i.e., unused) driver.
--------------------------------------------

Parallel idea: Have you had a lesson recently? The skyballs might have more to do with ball position and swing plane than driver loft.

Thanks I didn't understand the difference between the pro and regular. I'm gonna test the 16 next week. I got lessons today. I was swinging and average of 107.8


Posted
6 hours ago, wakefield724 said:

Thanks I didn't understand the difference between the pro and regular. I'm gonna test the 16 next week. I got lessons today. I was swinging and average of 107.8

XR Pro driver is 440 cc not 460 cc. It has a different crown design that allows them to shift weight lower which lowers spin and launch angle. The shaft options are different.

Dependent on the swing, XR Pro would fit a golfer who swing aggressive and fast. The faster ball speed doesn't need as much spin to stay in the air to maximize distance.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If you're launching that high and it is not a swing or setup issue (not hitting down), then you sound very aggressive with that high ball flight. Lower loft with a shaft profile that works for you - generally lower launching and heavier shaft can offer more control. The downside to most "Pro" or Lower Spin drivers is a bit less forgiveness. That has changed more recently so that Pro/Low Spin drivers are more forgiving. You will see some of that in the XR16 Pro. Another tip for more control is a shorter stock shaft length. Instead of 45.5, many people look at the balance of consistency, control and speed at 44.5-45 inches.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Like others have said, get fitted. Since 2011, I have played some combination of 4W + 7W. I had a Cobra 3H and 4H a couple of years back, and would swap out the 7W for a 3H in cold months (keep out of cold wind, and rough thinner for wayward drives.) The 7W matched up with yardage often with 3H; the current 4H goes almost as long as 7W, but has a lower trajectory. 4H also bumped out 4i in last bag redo; I learned to hit stinger with 4H so that's my driving iron on tight holes with shallow landing area. Again, a side-by-side test will tell you which way to go. If 5W or 3H is meh, keep the 7W. Also, are you looking to replace the 7W with a 5W or 3H, or add a second bridge club (5W or 3H) to your bag?
    • Makes sense and aligns with other literature. Static stretching, especially for longer durations, can impede performance in strength and power activities. I would not want to do like hamstring, quad, and calf stretches then go immediately sprint. To me that sounds like a terrible Idea. I would rather start off walking, then jogging, then running, then ramp up to sprinting.  To me, static stretching isn't even a warmup activity. I like the term warmup; you want to get some exertion going before the activity.      a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }
    • Going to Florida for the usual February golf trip, and with our current weather, that date won't get here soon enough. Heading to Augusta GA for the Tuesday Master's practice round, will definitely get some golf in while I'm in the area for a few days. Hope to be able to catch up with @coachjimsc if he's around. Then it's back to Scotland first of July.  Playing 7 new courses, can't wait for that.  Then somewhere after that is the Rhode Island CC Member-Guest and then my normal October golf trip to Myrtle Beach.  
    • It sucks to carry around a lot of water, but ideally it should be way more than we think.  I buy those gallon jugs of water and hang them from my pushcart when I walk. I agree with the electrolytes as well. You don't just sweat out water, but you lose electrolytes as well. 
    • A 2010 study from the Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research compares the effects of different pre-round stretch routines for competitive golfers. Active Dynamic Warm-up: Swing Medicus driver, hit 3 shots each with selected clubs. Passive Static Stretches: Various athletic stretches such as hamstrings, chest stretch and reverse trunk twist. The subjects were collegiate golfers with a HDCP index of 5 or less who engaged regularly in strength and fitness routines. All golfers had two test days: one with active dynamic (AD) warmup, a second with AD followed by static stretches (SS). The results were then compared, within golfers and across golfers. For performance testing after the warmups, golfers hit three driver shots at time 0, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after the warmup. The study shows that static stretch formats produced poorer performance outcomes in the four measures shown in Table 5, which shows Time Zero results. The performance deficits under the PSS protocol decreased over time. Some suggestions on why the passive protocol was tied to lower performance than the active protocol: The passive stretches routine induced excessive range of motion,  basically producing wobbles in the golf swing. Other research indicates that the stretching produced slack in the tendons, lessening the amount of muscle force that could be transferred into the shot. One caveat: The study had good scientific controls and balancing of treatments (test routines). This was, however, an exploratory study and raises as many questions as it answers. Also, although the study was done back in 2010, it is still cited as a primary work in recent reviews. A quick online search did not reveal any follow-ups on the study. For those interested, the study PDF is below. PassiveStretchGOLF.pdf  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.