Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

The Golf Ball "Problem": PGA Tour Players Hitting it Far is a Problem for All of Golf?


Note: This thread is 1955 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

The Golf Ball "Problem"  

174 members have voted

  1. 1. Does the distance modern PGA Tour pros hit the ball pose a problem to golf as a whole?

    • Yes
      40
    • No
      134
  2. 2. What is the main source of the "problem" above?

    • The golf ball goes too far, primarily.
      23
    • Several factors all contribute heavily.
      26
    • I voted "No" above, and I don't think there's really a "problem" right now.
      125


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/17/2017 at 5:10 PM, Jack Watson said:

Find a mod PGA guy who says the olden times players were not as good as they are now.  Present evidence...

https://www.golfdigest.com/story/how-would-modern-tour-pros-do-hitting-ben-hogans-old-clubs-we-had-them-try-and-it-wasnt-pretty

I challenge anyone to present evidence that modern tour players think that they are better than their predecessors...

This is a simple fact.  The old times players had to strike with greater precision.

Nice post, I enjoyed watching the video.

However, I'm 100% sure the modern players hit with just as much precision anyway. Also, I doubt many or if any modern tour players make any kind of comparison stating that they're better with tour players of the past. They're from different eras, hard to compare.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Lihu said:

However, I'm 100% sure the modern players hit with just as much precision anyway.

Of course they do. And this is what @Jack Watson is missing. Yes the equipment is better. But so are the athletes. What Jack is forgetting is that it's not like all the modern tour players are now hitting the ball a mile. Tiger came out and first shook the game up with his distance.  All the pros were playing modern equipment, it was Tiger who stood out. That's skill and precision @Jack Watson, not just equipment. I remember a skins game (remember those) when Tiger was playing and Jack Nicklaus was there, Mark O'meara as well. Jack says, "Criminey Tiger just hit a 7i on that shot" (Don't remember the yardage but it was very impressive) then Mark O says, "Well he's supposed to hit it like that, he's 22". Jack Nicklaus then says, "Well, you never hit it like that when you were 22." Mic drop. 

To think the older players were 'more precise' or required more skill is asinine. They were great golfers doing the best with the equipment available at that time. Just like today the golfers are doing their best with the equipment of today. But it's not just the equipment. As @iacas has mentioned the athletes themselves are better. This has occurred in every sport. The 100m record keeps getting faster, the high jump higher, the long jump longer. Again I think this all boils down to a guy with good intentions who has been beaten to the ground by golf and just isn't able to relax and truly admit, golf is hard. Maybe too hard for him. Cheers Jack.

Edited by Vinsk

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, joro said:

It is a never ending discussion isn't it.

Damn it I'm off topic. Sorry.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

o think the older players were 'more precise' or required more skill is asinine.

Ask the mod pros about hitting persimmon.  I've posted examples.  They ALL say wow much more difficult,  so you are not arguing against me,  but them.  Again you lack any real point.  As far as your multiple thinly veiled ad hominem attacks against me,  I can only respond that I do not believe as you do that one must be a masochist to be a golfer.  Golf is what you make it.

@saevel25

Good points,  and in baseball the ball has prolly been juiced,  but it's nothing endorsed or admitted by MLB.  It's probably true but anyways in golf the governing bodies were bullied by the equipment manufacturers imo.  In the NBA they moved the line in for a couple years then returned it back where it was.

IMO in golf the equipment manufacturers caused a revolution,  and the governing bodies failed to protect the integrity of the game...Obviously that's just an opinion...

Edited by Jack Watson

  • Administrator
Posted
11 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

Ask the mod pros about hitting persimmon.  I've posted examples.  They ALL say wow much more difficult,  so you are not arguing against me,  but them.  Again you lack any real point.  As far as your multiple thinly veiled ad hominem attacks against me,  I can only respond that I do not believe as you do that one must be a masochist to be a golfer.  Golf is what you make it.

Difficulty of old equipment is not an argument that proves - at all - old players were more precise.

Logic fail @Jack Watson.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, iacas said:

Difficulty of old equipment is not an argument that proves - at all - old players were more precise.

Logic fail @Jack Watson.

So the assumption is old clubs ball were more difficult to hit.  I am assuming you mean you disagree on that,  and if so we have no quarrel.  Based on that assumption though it's no logic fail.


Posted
39 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

So the assumption is old clubs ball were more difficult to hit.  I am assuming you mean you disagree on that,  and if so we have no quarrel.  Based on that assumption though it's no logic fail.

Just because it was more difficult doesn't mean they were more precise. Remember, the new pros play better than the old ever did, so the difficulty difference is offset by the scores that are being shot nowadays.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Pretzel said:

Just because it was more difficult doesn't mean they were more precise. Remember, the new pros play better than the old ever did, so the difficulty difference is offset by the scores that are being shot nowadays.

The problem is, he will never admit that the current golfers are superior than their predecessors. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Jack Watson said:

So the assumption is old clubs ball were more difficult to hit.  I am assuming you mean you disagree on that,  and if so we have no quarrel.  Based on that assumption though it's no logic fail.

No.

What @Pretzel said.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

Just because it was more difficult doesn't mean they were more precise. Remember, the new pros play better than the old ever did, so the difficulty difference is offset by the scores that are being shot nowadays.

-Ben Hogan won the Vardon Trophy in 1948 with an average score of 69.3.  In 2008 Sergio Garcia won the Vardon Trophy with a score of 69.12.

hmmmm


  • Administrator
Posted
7 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

-Ben Hogan won the Vardon Trophy in 1948 with an average score of 69.3.  In 2008 Sergio Garcia won the Vardon Trophy with a score of 69.12.

hmmmm

Still failing.

Sergio played far more difficult courses.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You pick one person. It's easy to nit pick data for your own advantage. Would Hogan succeed in the modern era, probably. Would he be as dominant, most likely not. He didn't compete against the quality of players the best players have to compete against today. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@saevel25

true,  stats can be used to prove almost any point.  @iacas has a poin also, but so do I because the EQUIPMENT differed so greatly.  I am not a stats guy and would probably be made to look stupid by folks here who know stats better...It's just imo with crap agronomy and gear relatively that Hogan was able to do that.  Who knows what he would have done if he was not almost killed by a greyhound bus.  I have not publicly posted hope for Woods because I believe he won't be back, but like anyone who loves golf in the back of my mind I have a wish to see him at least contend again at a major.

In Shells golf match vs Snead Hogan hit every green and many accounts say even after the accident this was commonplace for him. Nicklaus once said when asked is Tiger the best striker you have ever seen and Jack replied no Ben Hogan easily.  The argument that today's players are more skilled golfers than the greats of yesteryear is not cut and dried.

Many knowledgeable people in golf agree that the older fellas were a bit better at ballstriking.  As far as the athletics argument for mod guys goes,  it's not necessary to be an Olympic class athlete to play world class golf

A  it's a game of skill and

B  the golf swing is not the most efficient motion in terms of body input equaling clubhead speed output.  You can have plenty of d without being a Federer or Curry class of athlete conditioning wise and we have seen it over the years.  Finally

you have many players on the champions tour whose driving average is farther now than it was during their prime on tour!  Explain that without taking into account equipment!  Everyone knows it's equipment!  

As always best wishes to all

 


  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, Jack Watson said:

Many knowledgeable people in golf agree that the older fellas were a bit better at ballstriking.

Many have said the opposite.

You’re well off topic now, and have been for far too long. So you’re done now.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/celebrity/v-b7ddaf4b-9395-34b6-9ddc-e32547089110_c-344b1553-7357-3e40-9c2e-64a72319083b_a-344b1553-7357-3e40-9c2e-64a72319083b?soc_src=newsroom&soc_trk=com.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard&.tsrc=newsroom

Tiger can’t believe how far he’s hitting the ball? Maybe it’s that you are arguably the best golfer of all time? That you came out and hit the ball like no one had ever seen? Give me a break ...stop this nonsense with limiting the distance. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well Vinsk, we all have opinions on it, but if you read the article Tiger seems to be referring to what he is getting into and that is course design.    He said the longall is taking more property to make courses longer.    It also takes more maintenance, water, and other things.    I don't think he has other problems except that maybe he doesn't like to think about people knocking it way past him when he was the man a few years ago.    Do we really know what he means?    


Posted
16 minutes ago, joro said:

Well Vinsk, we all have opinions on it, but if you read the article Tiger seems to be referring to what he is getting into and that is course design.    He said the longall is taking more property to make courses longer.    It also takes more maintenance, water, and other things.    I don't think he has other problems except that maybe he doesn't like to think about people knocking it way past him when he was the man a few years ago.    Do we really know what he means?    

Yeah I get that. But golf will find a way. It’s not like the tour players are out there shooting in the 50’s every round. There are still bogeys + a-plenty out there. And there are still shorter hitters winning tournaments (Brian Harmon for one). I don’t know much about golf course architecture but I don’t think there is a shortage of courses right now. And I also believe there are other ways to make a course difficult like Oakmont other than lengthening it.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1955 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I mean, a golfer is trespassing and damaging property. So, golf rules don’t supersede state laws. 😉 Like, if it isn’t marked and is off golf property. The right thing to do is take an unplayable lie or take stroke and distance.  Also, this is a liability for the course. The homeowner could easily say the course is liable for damage done because they knowingly didn't mark their boundaries which allowed golfers to trespass and damage property. 
    • Interestingly enough, if the course (the Committee in Rules terms) doesn't mark the boundaries, there is nothing out of bounds.  I realize that neighboring homeowners would take a dim view of golfers whacking balls from their backyards, but that's what the Definition of Out of Bounds requires. "All areas outside the boundary edge of the course as defined by the Committee."
    • I had two events the past two days. Yesterday I was playing a course blind. Hit it solid. Hit 9/14 fairways, 12/18 greens, 34 putts. Many of those putts were the result of balls that were close-ish to the hole when they landed, but wound up a long way away once they'd finished rolling (backwards mainly). Then today, hit 11/13 fairways, 11/18 greens, 37 putts, and shot 80. 8 over par and it wasn't particularly pretty. My big problem today was my pitching. I was inside 100 yards of the hole and off the green on 9 occasions.  1st - drive to about 75 yards, fanned a 58 degree short and right. On the green, but a good 40 feet away and good two putt from there (so took 3) 2nd - laid up to a bunker and it's narrow past it, so had 165 in, missed it right with an 8 iron. Wet rough, chip from about 5 yards off the green and the club snagged. It got on the green, but only temporarily. Overcorrected a bit on the next one and hit it a bit firm and it rolled out to about 35 feet. Putt didn't break and it ran on a bit and I missed the one back (greens were fast and a little bumpy, which didn't help, but doesn't excuse either). (took 5 to get down from close to the green) 4th - had about 95 from the right rough, hit it on the green and two putts (3) 5th - 90 from the fairway, tugged it and it got a firm bounce, chipped on and hit what I thought was a decent chip, but it ran out down the hill and two putts from 20 feet (4) 7th - 65 from the fairway, significant upslope and hit it a bit hard, ran long left against the collar. Tried to blade a PW, but it got under a bit so didn't advance it anything like far enough. Made a good two putt from there (4) 11th - 63 from the fairway, hit a squirrelly pitch on the green and two putts (3) 12th - 75 from the semi-rough, caught it a bit clean and it wound up on the back edge. Putting down a tier and it ran 8 feet past (that was actually a really good putt and couldn't have done any better I don't think) and missed that (4) 13th - 55 from the fairway, overcorrected and hit the big ball before the small ball. Then made a stellar up and down from 25 yards short to an elevated green with a putter (3) 15th - down in three from a greenside bunker (3) That was it. The other 9 holes I hit it on the green from outside 100 yards. So on those 9 occasions, I took 32 shots to get in the hole. 3.56 average. Terrible. Reason I'm posting this in here is to see if anyone has any suggestions for how to work on my contact with pitch shots. I don't have access to a grass range. Only mats and it's easy off a mat. Partly I think my problem is I've hit it off mats so much this winter that I've lost my judgement on where the ball is versus the ground because of the leeway granted. Open to ideas. I also suspect that under pressure I stand a bit closer to it and then get steep and hit down on it and it puts me in a bad place, but I can't seem to get myself to not do that. 
    • “Well the world needs ditch diggers too!” - Judge Smails
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.