Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2886 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

New to this forum so hi all! 

I've played for a year now and always played with a poor set. I've just took over a set of TaylorMade RSi2's (4-Pw). As I'm 6'4 the clubs are 1 inch longer (once got measured at an open day somewhere and this is right for me). 

So this is the setup with lengths: 

Nr - std - plus1inch
i4 - 38,25 - 39,25
i5 - 37,75 - 38,75
i6 - 37,25 - 38,25
i7 - 36,75 - 37,75
i8 - 36,25 -36,25
i9 - 35,75 - 35,75
Pw - 35,5 - 36,5

I don't have the sets Aw (50) and Sw (56), but the standard length for those are:
Aw - 35,5 - 36,5 (same as Pw)
Sw - 35,25 - 36,25 

I do have 2 Cleveland RTX3.0 wedges in 50 and 56. Standaard length for those: 
50 wedge - 35,25
56 wedge - 35,125

These are not extended, and if I extend them with 1 inch they would become: 
50 wedge - 36,25 (0,25 shorter than in the set)
56 wedge - 36,125 (a marginal 0,125 shorter than in the set) 

I have searched/read a lot about lengthening clubs, but not necessarily about the extension of the wedges, and if the wedges also need to be extended (and match) with the iron set or not. Also because you sometimes grip the wedges shorter.

Also, anyone familiar with putting +1 inch on a RTX3.0? Is a wedge not normally more sensitive to changes in lie (as a result of the +1 in length)? 

And, if I lengthen the 50 and 56, should I lengthen +1 inch, or match the length as if it were the clubs in the standard RSi2 set? (marginal difference though)

Would love to hear some of your opinions on this topic. 

Greetings, 
Hamerhaai (the Netherlands)

 

Edited by Hamerhaai

Posted

Welkom...I'd pay attention to the lie angle and club head weight.  My 54 and 58 are identical (except the loft) and are shafted the same.  My PW and GW weigh the same (291 grams) but the PW is 1 degree flatter.  It isn't necessary to have the same even intervals in the wedges that one finds in the lower lofted irons.  My GW, SW, and LW, are all the same length...the only difference being that the shaft tips are trimmed a bit more, on the SW and LW, to compensate for the heavier heads.  The wedges, to my thinking, are a set to themselves rather than an extension of the irons.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
39 minutes ago, Piz said:

The wedges, to my thinking, are a set to themselves rather than an extension of the irons.

Thanks for your reply. 

That's what I was thinking when considering lengthening them. However, when playing from the fairway within the yardage of my Pw I don't want to top them because of shorter shaft length (in case 1,25 and 1,375 inch) than my Pw (and other irons). 

I'm in doubt. 


Posted

Another thing to consider is the profusion of wedges over the decades.  Time was a set had two: a pitching wedge and a sand wedge.  It was okay, back then, to maintain half inch increments.  That is no longer advisable when the bag might have 4 or 5 wedges in it.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Hamerhaai said:

Nr - std - plus1inch
i4 - 38,25 - 39,25
i5 - 37,75 - 38,75
i6 - 37,25 - 38,25
i7 - 36,75 - 37,75
i8 - 36,25 - 37,25
i9 - 35,75 - 36,75
Pw - 35,5 - 36,5

Did this wrong in first post, but you probably got it. 

So, advice would be to approuch the wedges as a separate category as the irons and play 'm like that? In order to don't mess up lie, weight etc.? 

Any other with the same experience (problem)? 


Posted

Is adding 1 inch to my Cleveland RTX 3.0 50 and 56 to be advised? I think (after being on the range and playing a 18 holes par3 course today) I had some trouble hitting the ball correct without adjusting my swing. With the much shorter length I topped it a few times and when hitting it correct it didn't felt controlled. 

Some experiences here with the same problem? What to do? 
1. add 1 inch to the wedges
2. learn how to play with different shaft lengths 

Greetings, much appreciated, 


Posted

I would definitely recommend extending your wedges as well.  My suggestion would be to continue stepping down the wedges in .25" increments.  So it would look like this:

9 ir - 36.75"

PW - 36.5"

50* - 36.25"

56* - 36"

I've always felt this makes the set flow better in the short irons and wedges as opposed to the PW and GW being the same length, then a step-down to the SW.  Does that make sense?

As far as wedges being more sensitive to changes in lie angle, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that. 

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, 1badbadger said:

50* - 36.25"

56* - 36"

Does that make sense?

Yes it does, thank you! Probably this week set foot in a shop to get this fixed. If the guy there doesn’t fight it or recommends different. 

2 hours ago, 1badbadger said:

As far as wedges being more sensitive to changes in lie angle, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that. 

I believe I had read somewhere that a higher loft is more sensitive to a wrong lie angle (as a result of adding an inch to the shaft). The flight distance compensates this deviation, but it’s relatively more off target.


Posted

My son has a club with pw like loft that's about half a metre long, hit it more consistently than any of my own standard or +1/2 inch wedges.


Note: This thread is 2886 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
    • I don't think that is true at all. That is off-topic here, I think. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.