Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2680 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I'm looking into some new irons I think I've narrowed it down to either the TaylorMade P series irons or Titleist AP series.  I know it comes down to what I hit better BUT I'm just looking for people who have experience in both or one of the sets I am looking at (TaylorMade P750, P770 or Titleist AP2 or AP3) just from an aesthetic, feel, and overall wear and tear perspective.  My irons now are Nike VR Split Cavity, I've had them for about 8 years now and they still look basically brand new, I take excellent care of them.  They are bladey looking but have the cavity back that offers the forgiveness on a shot that's not 100% in the middle of the face and I would like to stay with that same look.  I'm certainly not good enough to play a P730 that's too baldey for me so I'm looking for something with the looks of a blade but the forgiveness of a cavity backed iron.

 

Thanks!!

Thomas

Driver: :tmade: M3 10*  3 Wood: :nike: Vapor Fly 12*  Hybrid: :tmade: P790 UDI 2 Iron  Irons: :titleist: 716 AP2 (4-PW)  Wedges: :vokey:  52*, 56*, 60* Putter: :tmade: TP Juno  Shoes: :nike: Lunar Command,  :adidas: 360 Traxion, :adidas: Tour Boost 360  Bag: :titleist: 2016 Lightweight Stand Bag


Posted
1 hour ago, Tommy_Boy14 said:

So I'm looking into some new irons I think I've narrowed it down to either the TaylorMade P series irons or Titleist AP series.  I know it comes down to what I hit better BUT I'm just looking for people who have experience in both or one of the sets I am looking at (TaylorMade P750, P770 or Titleist AP2 or AP3) just from an aesthetic, feel, and overall wear and tear perspective.  My irons now are Nike VR Split Cavity, I've had them for about 8 years now and they still look basically brand new, I take excellent care of them.  They are bladey looking but have the cavity back that offers the forgiveness on a shot that's not 100% in the middle of the face and I would like to stay with that same look.  I'm certainly not good enough to play a P730 that's too baldey for me so I'm looking for something with the looks of a blade but the forgiveness of a cavity backed iron.

 

Thanks!!

You are a 6 handicap...how are you not good enough to play a blade??  If its preference, I get it, but don't sell yourself short by saying you aren't good enough to play a blade.  I started playing blades about 8-9 years ago when I was about a 10-12 handicap.  Bought a set of Nike TW Blades.  Rode them down to about a 4 handicap.  Next set was the Nike VR Pro blades and rode them down to a 1 handicap.  Just recently upgraded to the Callaway Apex MB irons...hoping to ride them into the plus handicaps.  I would go to a golf shop and hit some blades, you might be surprised at how well you hit them.  It has made me put some work into making center face contact which has improved my game. 

Best thing to do is to go get fitted.  Go with an open mind and not be focused on a specific brand.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Tommy_Boy14 said:

aesthetic, feel, and overall wear and tear

I've had the 718 AP2's since last fall and absolutely love them.  I'm nowhere near your skill level and have only played about 15 rounds total maybe with them but I'm they are beautiful, feel great, and I've noticed no wear and tear.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Titleist is the brand most played by professionals and college players, and within Titleist; AP2 is the most common model used. i’m a mid handicapper and love my AP2s.


Posted

All the major brands produce good clubs. If you are looking for something that is blade-ish in looks, but has some game improvement help. A short list off the top of my head, 

Taylormade and Callaway produce blade irons that are not in the traditional design of muscle back (i.e. titles MB's).
The Mizuno JPX line is good.
I like my Srixon set a lot. They offer a great selection of golf shaft options at no upcharge. 
I wouldn't discount Ping irons.

I would just get fitted and try out a bunch of them. You might be surprised what you end up with. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/3/2018 at 5:39 AM, Tommy_Boy14 said:

So I'm looking into some new irons I think I've narrowed it down to either the TaylorMade P series irons or Titleist AP series.  I know it comes down to what I hit better BUT I'm just looking for people who have experience in both or one of the sets I am looking at (TaylorMade P750, P770 or Titleist AP2 or AP3) just from an aesthetic, feel, and overall wear and tear perspective.  My irons now are Nike VR Split Cavity, I've had them for about 8 years now and they still look basically brand new, I take excellent care of them.  They are bladey looking but have the cavity back that offers the forgiveness on a shot that's not 100% in the middle of the face and I would like to stay with that same look.  I'm certainly not good enough to play a P730 that's too baldey for me so I'm looking for something with the looks of a blade but the forgiveness of a cavity backed iron.

 

Thanks!!

Fyi, the P770 is analogous to the Ap2 (player’s cavity back) and the P790 is analogous to the Ap3 (hollow player’s distance iron).  If you are considering TaylorMade P750 then that would be more like the Titleist CB (minimalist cavity back).  And of course each company’s blade would be comparable.

They all look close to blades from the top IMO except the P790, which is a bit bigger.  The AP3 has more noticeable offset than the others.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2680 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.