Jump to content
IGNORED

Handicap rounds from different tees


Note: This thread is 4821 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

In EGA handicap system one may play from whichever tee one wishes as the net result is calculated with the help of the Slope system. But how is this done in the USGA system? Is a male person allowed to play a hcp round from eg. women's tee? What about playing from men's club tee and back tee? How is the change in difficulty taken into account?


Pebble Beach

BLACK: Rating 75.5 / Slope 145
BLUE: Rating 74.7 / Slope 143
GOLD: Rating 72.6 / Slope 136
WHITE: Rating 71.3 / Slope 132
RED: Rating 71.8 / Slope 129




Originally Posted by Ignorant

In EGA handicap system one may play from whichever tee one wishes as the net result is calculated with the help of the Slope system. But how is this done in the USGA system? Is a male person allowed to play a hcp round from eg. women's tee? What about playing from men's club tee and back tee? How is the change in difficulty taken into account?


A man is only allowed to play a handicap round from a given tee set if it has been rated for men.  Most courses I've played don't have a men's rating for their forward tees posted on the card.  I don't know if that information is available by asking or not, as I've never asked.  If a tee set hasn't been rated for a given segment of players, then it can't reasonably be used for handicap.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Rating and slope varies depending on the tee.  It can be tricky because not every tee is always given a rating, e.g., women's tees are sometimes not rated for men's play (and vice-versa---often the longest men's tees are not rated for women's play).  In that case, there are guidelines in the handicap manual for estimating the rating/slope based on the yardage change from the nearest rated tees.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"




Originally Posted by zeg

Rating and slope varies depending on the tee.  It can be tricky because not every tee is always given a rating, e.g., women's tees are sometimes not rated for men's play (and vice-versa---often the longest men's tees are not rated for women's play).  In that case, there are guidelines in the handicap manual for estimating the rating/slope based on the yardage change from the nearest rated tees.


I find this a bit tricky to understand. As far as I've understood the USGA handicap is calculated by taking the average of the best 10 out of latest 20 rounds multiplied with 0.94. So how does slope hcp and net results come into picture here?

Oh, and the average is calculated from the gross score, not the net score. Or am I completely lost here?


You could easily find this online, but I'll share.  Handicap score for a given round is:

[ Score - (Rating from tees you played) ] * 113 / (Slope from tees you played) * 0.96

You average the 10 lowest of these numbers from your last 20 rounds and that's your handicap index.

You can think of this sort of as first finding your score relative to what a scratch golfer should average (Score - Rating).  Then you multiply by a number that takes into account how easy the course is (113 / Slope).  Here 113 is arbitrarily the slope of some course of "average" difficulty, so if you play a course with a slope of 125, that course is harder than "average", so you get to multiply how many shots you shot over the course rating by some number less than 1 to take into account that this course was more difficult.  Then you further get to multiply by 0.96 as an extra fudge that I've never quite understood.  Something about how your handicap should be more about what you hit on a good day, rather than an average day.

Note also that at 113 isn't really a slope rating of a course of "average" difficulty.  The very easy, wide open courses that I'll play when I want to practice without huge penalties for misses or when I want an ego boost about how low I can score have slopes in the 117-120 range from the back tees (6700-6800 yards) and 115-117 from the front tees (low 6000s yards).  Basically only courses that are literally flat with almost no trees, almost no bunkers, and very short will get a slope of less than 113, so if you're playing full length courses that (113 / Slope) multiplier will almost always be at least partially an extra fudge factor that makes your handicap lower than the average difference between your score and par.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by mdl

You could easily find this online, but I'll share.  Handicap score for a given round is:

[ Score - (Rating from tees you played) ] * 113 / (Slope from tees you played) * 0.96

You average the 10 lowest of these numbers from your last 20 rounds and that's your handicap index.

You can think of this sort of as first finding your score relative to what a scratch golfer should average (Score - Rating).  Then you multiply by a number that takes into account how easy the course is (113 / Slope).  Here 113 is arbitrarily the slope of some course of "average" difficulty, so if you play a course with a slope of 125, that course is harder than "average", so you get to multiply how many shots you shot over the course rating by some number less than 1 to take into account that this course was more difficult.  Then you further get to multiply by 0.96 as an extra fudge that I've never quite understood.  Something about how your handicap should be more about what you hit on a good day, rather than an average day.

Note also that at 113 isn't really a slope rating of a course of "average" difficulty.  The very easy, wide open courses that I'll play when I want to practice without huge penalties for misses or when I want an ego boost about how low I can score have slopes in the 117-120 range from the back tees (6700-6800 yards) and 115-117 from the front tees (low 6000s yards).  Basically only courses that are literally flat with almost no trees, almost no bunkers, and very short will get a slope of less than 113, so if you're playing full length courses that (113 / Slope) multiplier will almost always be at least partially an extra fudge factor that makes your handicap lower than the average difference between your score and par.



Ok, it's the net score that counts. Thanks, man, all clear now!




Quote:
Originally Posted by mdl View Post
Then you further get to multiply by 0.96 as an extra fudge that I've never quite understood.  Something about how your handicap should be more about what you hit on a good day, rather than an average day.

The 0.96 is supposed to reward the lower-handicap player for being a better golfer, since it gives fewer strokes than you "deserve" (compared to using 1.0 instead of 0.96).  It's choosing the best 10 of 20 that makes the number reflect your better days.

Note also that at 113 isn't really a slope rating of a course of "average" difficulty.  The very easy, wide open courses that I'll play when I want to practice without huge penalties for misses or when I want an ego boost about how low I can score have slopes in the 117-120 range from the back tees (6700-6800 yards) and 115-117 from the front tees (low 6000s yards).  Basically only courses that are literally flat with almost no trees, almost no bunkers, and very short will get a slope of less than 113, so if you're playing full length courses that (113 / Slope) multiplier will almost always be at least partially an extra fudge factor that makes your handicap lower than the average difference between your score and par.

The slope is intended to reflect how much more difficult the course is for a higher handicapper than it is for a scratch golfer, whereas the rating is the expectation for a scratch golfer.  So a course with a low rating and high slope would indicate that it's easy as long as you can hit the ball where you aim (so perhaps short with tight fairways and lots of trees).  A high rating and low slope is harder for me to picture, and is rare in the areas I've seen.  I suppose miniature golf would probably qualify here.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"




Originally Posted by Ignorant

Ok, it's the net score that counts. Thanks, man, all clear now!


Not quite - your differential is what counts, which is not the same as your net score.

Your differential is the number obtained by applying the slope and rating to your score, as described in the formula mdl posted above. (For example, if I shoot a 90 from tees with a rating of 69.4 and a slope of 122, my differential is 19.1*). The 10 best of your last 20 differentials are used to calculate your handicap.

Your net score is your actual score minus your course handicap, which is calculated by multiplying your current handicap by (slope/113), then rounding to the nearest integer. For example, if my handicap is 20 then my course handicap for the tees described above is 22. That means my net score for the round is 90-22, or 68. Net scores are really only used in tournaments or league play. (Although you can use them to see how close you played to your handicap - in the example above, my net score was 1.4 strokes below the course rating, so you could say I played better than my handicap by 1.4 strokes).

*I did not apply the 0.96 since that's usually done to the average of 10, not each individual score - although yes, mathematically it works out the same.

Bill




Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Not quite - your differential is what counts, which is not the same as your net score.

Your differential is the number obtained by applying the slope and rating to your score, as described in the formula mdl posted above. (For example, if I shoot a 90 from tees with a rating of 69.4 and a slope of 122, my differential is 19.1*). The 10 best of your last 20 differentials are used to calculate your handicap.

Your net score is your actual score minus your course handicap, which is calculated by multiplying your current handicap by (slope/113), then rounding to the nearest integer. For example, if my handicap is 20 then my course handicap for the tees described above is 22. That means my net score for the round is 90-22, or 68. Net scores are really only used in tournaments or league play. (Although you can use them to see how close you played to your handicap - in the example above, my net score was 1.4 strokes below the course rating, so you could say I played better than my handicap by 1.4 strokes).

*I did not apply the 0.96 since that's usually done to the average of 10, not each individual score - although yes, mathematically it works out the same.



Good explanation, maybe I finally understood


There are different ratings/slopes for men and women?  I didn't know there were tees only rated for men or women...

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


You're kidding, right?!?

Originally Posted by Gresh24

There are different ratings/slopes for men and women?  I didn't know there were tees only rated for men or women...



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.




Originally Posted by sean_miller

You're kidding, right?!?


Unfortunately, no.  Obviously the closer tees are rated lower/easier, I understand that.  But why would those ratings be different for men and women?

So women only have one option for tees?  And men have up to 4 or 5?  Or do some of them (same tees) have different ratings for men and women?

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW




Originally Posted by Gresh24

Unfortunately, no.  Obviously the closer tees are rated lower/easier, I understand that.  But why would those ratings be different for men and women?

So women only have one option for tees?  And men have up to 4 or 5?  Or do some of them (same tees) have different ratings for men and women?


No some are only men, some only women, and some both.  For instance, my home course has 4 sets of tees the Professional, Championship, Regular, and Forward.  The Professional and Championship tees only have a mens rating, the Regular tees are rated for both and the Forward tees are only rated for women.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
PXG 0211 Driver (Diamana S+ 60; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrids (MMT 80; 22°, 25°, and 28°) · PXG 0311P Gen 2 Irons (SteelFiber i95; 7-PW) · Edel Wedges (KBS Hi-Rev; 50°, 55°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Vice Pro or Maxfli Tour · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · Star Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Sun Mountain C130S Bag

On my MacBook Pro:
Analyzr Pro

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

No some are only men, some only women, and some both.  For instance, my home course has 4 sets of tees the Professional, Championship, Regular, and Forward.  The Professional and Championship tees only have a mens rating, the Regular tees are rated for both and the Forward tees are only rated for women.



So, the regular tee has two different ratings, one for men and one for women?

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Originally Posted by Gresh24

So, the regular tee has two different ratings, one for men and one for women?


Yep.  Women's ratings are always higher, largely because women as a rule do not hit the ball as far.  For example, by definition a male bogey golfer averages 200 yards off the tee versus 150 yards for a female bogey golfer (250 yards vs 210 yards for scratch golfers).

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"




Originally Posted by zeg

Yep.  Women's ratings are always higher, largely because women as a rule do not hit the ball as far.  For example, by definition a male bogey golfer averages 200 yards off the tee versus 150 yards for a female bogey golfer (250 yards vs 210 yards for scratch golfers).



Thanks for the clarification.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Note: This thread is 4821 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The hype with the LAB Putters is something ive kept a keen eye on but i havent actually tried one... yet!! I use a SeeMore PCB and have done for around 8 years now and it was a gamechanger for me. It was the first time i had been fitted for a putter and from then ive totally bought into the fact that the technology in the putters makes a massive difference The only issue i have with LAB was that i did quiz them on Instagram what the difference between my PCB and a LAB Putter would be as the PCB from what i can find is just as balanced as the LAB Putters, however LAB couldnt tell me what the difference was and just said they didnt beleive in SeeMore Technology, but i wanted to know 'Why'!!  So yeah, the tech im sure works and think if anyone hasnt gamed a putter like LAB or SeeMore where custom fitting is crucial, then you gotta give it a go!
    • Day 335 - More putting work, with the focus on setup and hitting the sweet spot. 
    • Day 153: putted for a while using the 2 cups drill inside. Working on bead primarily. Contact was really good. 
    • Day 8: 12/17/2024 Okay I took my new PPJ swing thought to the range today. I wasn't sure I was quite ready to do so, but I'm glad I did.  When I got it right it was good... really good. When I got it wrong it was a major fail. I hit lots of really ugly ones. But I didn't let that deter me. I stayed committed and focused on the PPJ and I avoided any temptation to go back to what I was doing before just so that I could "look" better at the range. I'm pretty excited about what I saw when I got it right.  I hit the 6 iron mostly (nearly all block work today). I also hit about 6 balls each with the PW, 8I, 5W and Driver. Those had varying degrees of success. I did crack one drive that let me feel and see what the changes will look like once I get fully trained.  Anyway, I'm going to go back to the mirror work for a couple of more days before bringing it back to the range. I do feel like if I can get this right my swing will improve a lot. So I think its worth the effort. I liked the way it looked on GEARs when I get it right, and I like the results I got at the range when I got it right. Now the goal is to work towards getting it right more often. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...