Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

The Overall Golf World Reflected Through the Ban on Anchored Strokes


Note: This thread is 4605 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

As I’m sure many of you are aware, the USGA has imposed a ban on anchoring the golf stroke, which the PGA Tour has adopted, effective January 1, 2016.  Just like with any other rule or ban that comes out, a lot of argument and debate closely followed suit. I believe that this ban, and all the arguments surrounding it, actually brings attention to some of the fundamental aspects of the golf world as whole.

One of the reasons this ban was put in place is because those opposed to the long putter felt that this new anchored putting stroke looked unconventional and unnatural when compared to the traditional putting stroke. This reasoning shows how deeply steeped in tradition golf really is. By proposing a ban primarily because the anchored putting stroke is not traditional shows how much golf values the many traditions surrounding it. The traditional putting stroke can be thought of as similar to the traditions of the Green Jacket or the fact that the US Open always concluding on Father’s Day.

The other aspect of the game that is revealed because of this ban is that everything in golf is meant to be as fair as possible so that competition stems completely from the skill of the player, rather than the equipment they’re using. It’s been argued that the belly putter provides users with an advantage while putting. Golf doesn’t want people to be more skillful purely because of a piece of equipment; rather, players should be skilled because of how they use the same equipment as others.

In the end, this ban manages to show the true colors of the golf world. One, that it is deeply steeped in tradition and two, that competition should stem completely from the skill of a player and not the equipment being used. I believe both aspects can be seen as a result of this ban and surrounding arguments. My question to you is if you agree with me, or have any further analysis?


Posted

I don't understand the traditional aspects of banning the belly putter.  All equipment has changed over time, putters have reltivly stayed the same. I'm of the lot that if it improves your game, why not use it?  This isn't something new, guys have been using belly putters for over 30 years.  Anyone can purchase a belly putter if they desire.  If you think it's an advantage to use one, then use one!  For the record, I don't use a belly putter, nor have I ever tried using one, but I'm not apposed to, nor do I look down on anyone that does.

Driver:        :tmade:- R11s                             GPS:        :skycaddie:- SGXW

3W:            :titleist:-910F 15*                             BAG:        :titleist:- 14 Way carry bag

Hybrid:       :titleist:910H 19*                                           :titleist:- 14 Way Cart bag

Irons 4-PW::titleist:- AP2 712

Wedges:    :vokey:- 52, 56, 60

Putter:       :cameron:- Studio Select 1.5

Ball:          :titleist:- Pro V1x


Posted

'One of the reasons this ban was put in place is because those opposed to the long putter felt that this new anchored putting stroke looked unconventional and unnatural when compared to the traditional putting stroke.'

I believe that there is more to this than simply 'looks'. You claim the belly putter 'looks', or appears, or seems unconventional or unnatural. And this appearance goes against the traditions  of the game, hence cannot be tolerated.

However, those who do oppose such putters maintain that. in fact, the use of those putters does not conform to the traditional method of striking the ball. We can't scoop the ball, can't use the handle to hit the ball (ala billiards) nor can we push the ball with the club head. Tradition and current rules indicate that we use our hands only to hold the club and swing the stick to strike the ball. Positioning the club against our body, resulting in a stable point, denies a free swing of the club. Ergo, Banned!  I concur.


Posted

My question is - what will the *traditionalists* cry about when the long putter is still used in a non-anchored fashion?

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Funny thing about "traditionalists" (in any sport) is that they only take back it so far. Usually to how the game was played when they were young. Not when their grandfather was young, and certainly not further back than that. For that reason "tradition" changes over time no matter what. The people that would consider tradition a feathery and a wooden club are all dead.

In this case I don't have a problem with a long putter except that I don't like the way it looks, but I can say the same for some of the huge putter heads on some conventional putters. I have yet to consider it a disadvantage when my opponent is using an anchored putter. In fact I figure he's probably got putting problems and I have the advantage.

I remember when batter's helmets with ear flaps had to be grandfathered in gradually because of tradition and when the Fosbury flop looked completely silly and unconventional.


Posted

Calling something not traditional is like a "Get out of Jail Free" card, there's no time limit or rules on when you use it but it always seems to work.  In the case of anchored putting, the first recorded use of an anchored stroke was in 1924 by Lou Diegel and in 1966 PGA Tour Pro Phil Rodgers wins two tournaments with it.  Up until the end of 2011 it seemed to be an accepted method, but once more golfers started using it and winning Majors with it, it became untraditional.

It should have been banned in 1924 or at least in 1966 but the USGA and R&A; dropped the ball.  I never used an anchored stroke and actually agree that it's not a legal golf stroke and never has been, but I'd prefer people (R&A;, USGA) own their mistakes and not hide behind the tradition of the game.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't expect a change but I think they should allow the 50+ guys use it, I think were going to see some careers cut short especially the older guys and I think that's a shame.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition


Posted

I don't understand the traditional aspects of banning the belly putter.  All equipment has changed over time, putters have reltivly stayed the same. I'm of the lot that if it improves your game, why not use it?  This isn't something new, guys have been using belly putters for over 30 years.  Anyone can purchase a belly putter if they desire.  If you think it's an advantage to use one, then use one!  For the record, I don't use a belly putter, nor have I ever tried using one, but I'm not apposed to, nor do I look down on anyone that does.

How a stroke is made had not changed significantly through the centuries until the advent of the anchored putter, and that is what is being banned.  The putter itself is NOT banned, only the anchored stroke.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

When discussing the anchoring stroke, one thing not often mentioned is that in 1968 the USGA banned croquet style putting. I, for one, had been very successful with this style of putting, especially from 10 feet and closer. I survived the ban, but I am also certain that I missed a number of putts over the years that I could have made croquet style. I tried anchoring, but it just did not work for me.

A little history:  Bob Duden invented and patented the croquet style putter, which he named "The Dude".  Although Mr. Duden never won on the tour, he did finish second 3 times. When other well-known professionals like Sam Snead adopted this revolutionary putting technique, its popularity began to surge. Late in his career Snead's putting was failing him and during the 1966 US PGA Championship he straddled the golf ball and decided to putt croquet style with good success. After posting good results including a top-10 finish at the 1967 US Masters, Bobby Jones and others took a dislike to the style and by January 1, 1968 the putting style was outlawed and Rule 16-1e added to the rules of golf:

USGA rule 16-1e:
The player must not make a stroke on the putting green from a stance astride, or with either foot touching, the line of putt or an extension of that line behind the ball.

Here is a wonderful article about the ban on croquet putting...

http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2013/06/croquet_putting_golf_s_unconscionable_ban_on_putting_between_your_legs.html

Here is an another interesting article on nine things that have been banned form golf....

http://www.aussiegolfer.net/9-things-that-have-been-banned-from-golf/

Drivers: Bag 1 - TM R11 (10.5°); Bag 2 - Ping G5 (9°),
Fairway woods: #1 - TM RBZ Tour (14.5°) & TM System 2 Raylor (17°); #2 - TM Burner (15°) & TM V-Steel (18°)
Hybrid: #1 - TM Rocketballz (19°); #2 - Ping G5 (19°)
Irons: #1 - Ping i3+; #2 - Hogan Edge  (both 4-pw, +1" shaft)
Wedges: #1 - Ping i3+ U wedge (52°) & Ping Eye 2+ BeCu (60°); #2 - Ping ISI Sand BeCu (52°) & Cleveland CG11 lob (60°)
Putters: Ping B60i & Anser 2, Odyssey White Steel 2-Ball & White Hot XG #9, Lamkim Jumbp grips
Golf Balls: Titleist Pro V1, Bridgestone B330, Callaway SR1, Slazenger Grips: Lamkin Crossline
Golf Shoes: Footjoy & Adidas; Golf Glove: Footjoy StaSof®; Golf Bag: Ping Hoofer
I love this game! :-D


Posted
[if gte mso 9]>

Normal

0

false

false

false

EN-US

JA

X-NONE

DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"

LatentStyleCount="276">

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>

As I’m sure many of you are aware, the USGA has imposed a ban on anchoring the golf stroke, which the PGA Tour has adopted, effective January 1, 2016.  Just like with any other rule or ban that comes out, a lot of argument and debate closely followed suit. I believe that this ban, and all the arguments surrounding it, actually brings attention to some of the fundamental aspects of the golf world as whole.

One of the reasons this ban was put in place is because those opposed to the long putter felt that this new anchored putting stroke looked unconventional and unnatural when compared to the traditional putting stroke. This reasoning shows how deeply steeped in tradition golf really is. By proposing a ban primarily because the anchored putting stroke is not traditional shows how much golf values the many traditions surrounding it. The traditional putting stroke can be thought of as similar to the traditions of the Green Jacket or the fact that the US Open always concluding on Father’s Day.

The other aspect of the game that is revealed because of this ban is that everything in golf is meant to be as fair as possible so that competition stems completely from the skill of the player, rather than the equipment they’re using. It’s been argued that the belly putter provides users with an advantage while putting. Golf doesn’t want people to be more skillful purely because of a piece of equipment; rather, players should be skilled because of how they use the same equipment as others.

In the end, this ban manages to show the true colors of the golf world. One, that it is deeply steeped in tradition and two, that competition should stem completely from the skill of a player and not the equipment being used. I believe both aspects can be seen as a result of this ban and surrounding arguments. My question to you is if you agree with me, or have any further analysis?

EndFragment

I think you are wrong on both counts.  It would be hard to find a sport that has been more embracing of advances in technology in equipment that makes players better.  Look at the driving distance change over the last 30 years, for example.  There are guys on the Champions tour that hit it longer at age 55 than they ever did at age 30.  Tradition did not prevent these things.

There have been 2 major equipment rulings over the last 20 or so years, the groove ruling and the anchoring ruling.  In both cases the rulings address qualitative aspects of the game, not quantitative aspects.  The groove ruling was made because the square grooves upset the distance/accuracy balance by insulating players from the natural consequences of inaccurately hitting into the rough.  The anchoring ruling was made because a swing and a hinging action are not the same, not because of aesthetics.  The fact that some people use this argument does not mean that this played any real factor in the decision of the rulesmakers.

I also disagree with your "fairness" argument because there is no evidence that anchoring intrinsically gives an actual advantage.  It may prove an advantage for individual players, but so does the choice of a golf ball.  A player may putt better with an anchored putter just as he may play better with a low-spin ball.  But that does not mean that anchoring or a low spin ball provides a universal advantage.  The simple evidence of this is that most players do NOT use an anchored putter.  If the advantage was universal then everyone who plays for a living would have made the change.  Are any pros still playing with a balata covered wound ball?  Or does every single one play with a modern ball.  Are any pros playing with a steel shafted driver, or have they universally shifted over to graphite.  THESE are things that provide a universal advantage and they have been universally adopted.  And not banned, so arguing that achoring was banned because of the advantage it brings just makes no sense.  If your advantage argument was valid we would be seeing a lot of other things banned.  If you want perfect "fairness" then every player would be required to play with the exact same equipment.

Welcome to the board, and nice first post.

  • Upvote 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thank you everyone for the feedback! I would just like to point out that I don't consider the advancements in technology to help the ball be hit farther or spin more untraditional, just that the actual physical act of making an anchored stroke untraditional. It looks unnatural when compared to the conventional putting stroke which is why I feel that was one of the reasons the ban came about in the first place.


  • Administrator
Posted
Thank you everyone for the feedback! I would just like to point out that I don't consider the advancements in technology to help the ball be hit farther or spin more untraditional, just that the actual physical act of making an anchored stroke untraditional. It looks unnatural when compared to the conventional putting stroke which is why I feel that was one of the reasons the ban came about in the first place.

Your basis for this is likely unfounded. They gave reasons why it was banned and "looks" wasn't among them.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think you are wrong on both counts.  It would be hard to find a sport that has been more embracing of advances in technology in equipment that makes players better.  Look at the driving distance change over the last 30 years, for example.  There are guys on the Champions tour that hit it longer at age 55 than they ever did at age 30.

Hell, even I hit it longer now, at 55, than I did at 30.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hell, even I hit it longer now, at 55, than I did at 30.....

So how sad does it make me, who still hits it shorter than when I was 30 (I'm 57). :-(:cry:

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
 

[if gte mso 9]>

Normal

0

false

false

false

EN-US

JA

X-NONE

DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"

LatentStyleCount="276">

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>

UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>

...One of the reasons this ban was put in place is because those opposed to the long putter felt that this new anchored putting stroke looked unconventional and unnatural when compared to the traditional putting stroke. This reasoning shows how deeply steeped in tradition golf really is. By proposing a ban primarily because the anchored putting stroke is not traditional shows how much golf values the many traditions surrounding it. The traditional putting stroke can be thought of as similar to the traditions of the Green Jacket or the fact that the US Open always concluding on Father’s Day...

EndFragment

No. Sorry. It has little to do with 'tradition' unless you mean that it's 'traditional' to only have a single anchor point when swinging a golf club during any sort of shot.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I couldn't care less about how something looks, the main issue is the fact that, when under pressure, the nerves affect your hands and this style of putting takes that out of the equation. Matt Kuchar's forearm anchoring doesnt sit too well with me either but they don't seem keen to take that on at this point.

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by David in FL

Hell, even I hit it longer now, at 55, than I did at 30.....

So how sad does it make me, who still hits it shorter than when I was 30 (I'm 57).

Wait 'til you're 67 like me. ;-) I'm definitely a shorter hitter now than I was at 30 something, but then I never saw the supposed added length that the evolving equipment was supposed to be generating.  My first metal driver, a TM Tour Driver (9.5° with a 43" steel TT shaft) back in 1988 was still as long as any I've ever owned - I've never been able to figure out why.  And that  was playing a Titleist Tour 100 Balata ball.  The equipment supposedly gets better, but I mostly stayed the same, even when I was still in my 40's.  I just played my game and didn't let it bother me that much.

I still believe that the added length is as much a factor of the 2-3 inch added shaft length in the driver and the stronger lofts in irons as it is in the hotter ball.  I cut my driver back to 44" for better control, so I wouldn't expect to see crazy distance out of it.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So how sad does it make me, who still hits it shorter than when I was 30 (I'm 57).  :-( :cry:

That just means you were a lot better at 30 than I was! ;-)

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4605 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.