• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Gerald

Which club you mostly use for chipping (chip and run) ?

0   45 votes

  1. 1. Which club you mostly use for chipping (chip and run) ?

    • 7i
      3
    • 8i
      10
    • 9i
      7
    • PW
      9
    • GW
      5
    • SW
      10
    • LW
      1

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

24 posts in this topic

The other day I took a lesson (yes even mid single handicapers take lessons) in chipping.

With my previous set (MP-57) I used the 8i mostly ...... although I know many lowcappers prefer to use their GW or PW for this. My pro agrees on the 8i by telling me that chip is actually short for chip and run ..... so with an 8i it is about 50% through the air and 50% roll.

My current set has really strong lofts, so I went for a 9i for my chips.

What do you use and why ?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I use my 8 iron. Though there is no way its 50% air and 50% run for me.  I play he ball off my inside back foot, hands well forward and then use a tad steeper swing then a putting stroke.  Therefore the ball runs more then it flies.  I tend to get the ball on the floor quickly.

I can vary the ball flight distance by changing the ball position at address (or, rarely, I use a more lofted club).  I move the ball forward a bit for more air time, but never further back then my normal chip address.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my 56 degree for almost all greenside chip and runs, only use the 60 with a hop and stop. Only use the PW if i'm a way's off the green, however, if my chipping is bothering me one day on the course, I will always use a PW instead of my SW to chip around.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost use the 54 for all chipping close to the green.  I will use my pw (48) for anything uphill or longer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a true chip and run, I use an 8i.

(From 1960s until 1994 I used a 7i with various sets, but then the lofts got stronger).

For a pitch and run, I use a 50*... unless I need quite a bit of run, then I use a PW.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to use my 56* but now I am seeing myself using my 52* more and more near the green unless I have a nice lie where I know I can make my ball roll out just a little by adding a bit of spin to my shot.

So..

PW - 140-130ish, some bump and run

52* - 125-115, Greenside, more bump and run

56* - 115 and in, and bunkers, little bump a run lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually use my 8 iron. The PW if I need more air time, or the 6 if it's a close chip.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I put SW, but in reality I use my GW, SW, or LW for all my greenside shots.  Which one depends how much green there is to work with and what is in front of me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I have an ancient Wilson Staff JP pitching wedge that I use for almost everything.

If I need a really long run, I might use a 7 or 8, but I rarely use that shot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like to use my 19 degree hybrid for a lot of chip and run scenarios, I fell like I can judge the distance quite a bit better. And it's like putting, but with more loft.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my LW, but I really would prefer not to get into another argument on the subject. I like the LW because I find it easier to practice with, I like the continuity, and because that's what works for me. I've tried using other wedges, irons, or hybrid, but I find myself struggling to adjust to different clubs for different shots. I don't like having to adjust the way I hit the ball and the club I hit it with, so I remove the latter variable and just work on the former. If that doesn't work for you, fine, chip with multiple clubs, but I find it easier and I encourage others to at least try it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements



Originally Posted by jamo

. . . but I really would prefer not to get into another argument on the subject . . .

There's no option in the poll for "it depends on my lie and where the pin is" so I chose 8 iron. I'm just as likely to use any other iron for a true chip and run, except the LW, but I don't want to get into an argument about it either.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by sean_miller

There's no option in the poll for "it depends on my lie and where the pin is" so I chose 8 iron. I'm just as likely to use any other iron for a true chip and run, except the LW, but I don't want to get into an argument about it either.


Well you won't get one from me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I use my 56° SW for almost all my chips and pitches where the landing area is the green or fringe.  My distance control is adequate and it is easier to just practice with one club.

If I'm playing a shot that I want to land outside the fringe, and roll a long way, I'll usually use a 7I, same as for most punch-outs, etc.  In specific situations, of course, this will vary (e.g., "putting" a choked-down 4I to hop over a few inches of nasty stuff just off the fringe), but those are exceptional situations.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7i

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my 7i the most, but I'll use anything that looks like it's right for the situation.  I play mostly courses with med to slow greens.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a true bump and run ill use my pw.However i like using my 60* on all greenside shots its the club im most comfortable with.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by 596

I use my 8 iron. Though there is no way its 50% air and 50% run for me.  I play he ball off my inside back foot, hands well forward and then use a tad steeper swing then a putting stroke.  Therefore the ball runs more then it flies.  I tend to get the ball on the floor quickly.

I can vary the ball flight distance by changing the ball position at address (or, rarely, I use a more lofted club).  I move the ball forward a bit for more air time, but never further back then my normal chip address.



I do the exact same thing, but I use my 9i.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries