Jump to content
IGNORED

Ruling Question: Can you assume a ball went into a water hazard?


Hokie2k5
Note: This thread is 5358 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

The hole is a dogleg right about 370 yards, there is water that comes into play about 270 out to the right but is basically blind from the tee due to a grove of trees in between the tee and the pond.

I playing competitor hits his ball right off the tee, no one hears and banging around in the trees or a splash in the lake. Myself and the 3rd member of our group saw the ball going right but never saw it down and our playing competitor never saw it down either.

We walked around that area both in the woods and down by the lake and never found his ball. He prompted dropped a ball two club lengths from where he though the ball would have entered the water hazard.

My question is, can you assume that? Sure there are a lot of different variables in play here but no one saw the ball go into the water hazard so is that considered a lost ball and he would have to go back to the tee?

Driver: 910D3 - Oban Kiyoshi 75 X / 909D3 - Oban Devotion 7 X
3 Wood: R9 TP - Oban Devotion 8 05
Hybrid: 909H - Project X Graphite
Irons: 4-6 AP2 - Project X 6.5 / 7-W MB - Project X 6.5
Wedges: Scratch 1018 52/56/60 KBS Tour XPutter: SC Button Back Newport 34" / SC Del Mar 34" / SC SS Newport...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
No, you can't assume it. The wording is (emphasis mine):

Source: USGA Rule 26-1
It is a question of fact whether a ball that has not been found after having been struck toward a water hazard is in the hazard. In order to apply this Rule, it must be known or virtually certain that the ball is in the hazard. In the absence of such knowledge or certainty, the player must proceed under Rule 27-1.



Rule 27-1 is the lost ball rule.

In the future, you can look this stuff up for yourself: http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules...and-Decisions/ .

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Can you hear a ball splash from 270 yards away?

If you see the ball enter the hazard and is absolutely certain it is in there, but can't find it, you can take a drop. If you never actually see the ball go into the hazard, you can't be sure if it's really there.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Virtually certain is still judgmental and many times depends on course knowledge. Considering the "relative" rarity of a lost ball in a non-hazard, if the ball is was clearly heading toward a known hazard and is subsequently never found, I don't know how you could not consider that "virtually certain". If you walk up and spend 5 minutes looking EVERYWHERE else without finding it, I would argue its a virtual certainty the ball is in the hazard, but its certainly debatable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Then the question is how you define "virtually" and in which situations you can use this rule.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd say if a ball is headed towards a hazard, has the carry to get to the hazard and an honest effort is spent looking for said ball without locating it, then IMO it is virtually certain it's in the hazard.

In my Nike SasQuatch Staff Bag:
Driver: Callaway FT-IQ 9.5 Stiff
Irons: Ping G5 4-P
Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 56*, Cleveland bent to 49*
Putter: Scotty Cameron California Monterey
Ball: Srizon Z-Star Yellow
Range: SkyCaddie 2.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'd say if a ball is headed towards a hazard, has the carry to get to the hazard and an honest effort is spent looking for said ball without locating it, then IMO it is virtually certain it's in the hazard.

Yep, I think you need a visual on the ball coming down so you can determine a line on which to look for the ball. From the sound of the OP situation, it sounds like it was around a dogleg and there would be no way to know a line the ball would be on toward the pond - especially if the ball hit trees. In this case, I would say that the guy should have played under the lost ball rule and rehit.

Titleist 910D3 8.5* Aldila RIP
Titleist 910F 13.5* Diamana Kai'li
Nickent 4DX 20* and 24*
Tour Preferred 5-PW
52.08, 56.14, 60.04 Titleist Vokey

Odyssey Metal-X #9 Putter

Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


270 and right is a long carry.

How deep was the rough short of the water?

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


270 and

I don't think he carried it the far though. I think he just hit it 270 right into the water and it may have rolled in or whatever but it's blind over there.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In the originally stated situation, if there is anyplace where the ball could be lost outside of the water hazard (deep rough, brush, etc.), then you do NOT have virtual certainty that the ball is in the hazard. Lacking any other evidence, the ball must be deemed lost outside of the hazard and Rule 27 is in effect.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5358 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...