Jump to content
IGNORED

Adjustable Drivers and Effective Loft ?


Gerald
Note: This thread is 3969 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I bumped into an article on Adjustable Drivers and Effective Loft ( http://www.addicted2golf.net/?p=674 ) and it says :

" The effective loft of any club will change if you open or close the club face by:

1) Not returning it to square at impact, or

2) Adjusting the face angle of an adjustable face driver

For example, let’s say you bought a 10.5 degree driver and change the setting from square to 2 degree closed.  For every degree closed, the effective loft increases by 1 degree.  So now, you’re gaming a loft of 12.5 degrees.  Now those manhood robbing  moon shots become a little easier to understand…

Of course, the opposite is true if you play an open face angle as most better players do.  The effective loft of a 9.5 degree driver with a 1 degree open face is 8.5 degrees.  That may be OK for some players but a good number will lack the club head speed to generate enough spin to lift the ball and optimize distance at that launch angle."

I feel it is the opposite way, closing the face would reduce the loft and opening would raise the loft

Or am I wrong ?

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hmm .... math is not my thing, but I don't understand, can you explain ...... bc when I open the face I would expect the loft to increase ..... or has it something to do with first having to understand what effective loft means ..........

Currently with hitting the ball more in the upswing with my 10.5* Cobra S2 Driver I have a high ball flight, would like a lower ball flight. Now it is in N (neutral) ....... what would be the outcome if I would put it to C (closed) ...... according to the Cobra website this would decrease the loft by 1.5* but as I now read it is the other way around ?????

So if I want a lower flight it should be in O (open) ..... according to the Cobra site increasing the loft by 1.5*, but actually the other way around......

very confusing !!!!!!

What a ball flight is to be expected with the C or O settings ?

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On any normal non-adjustable club wether it's a driver or a 5i, opening the face will increase loft, closing it will decrease loft.  On an adjustable driver like my R9, (I don't know for certain about other brands but they are likely the same), rotating the club head actually does increase the loft because the head is not rotating on the shaft.  The head is rotating on a tip that's glued to the shaft.  The tip of the tip that the club head rotates on is not in line with the center line of the shaft, in other words it's "bent", so that when you turn it to another position it's turning "uphill" or "downhill" so to speak.  That's how the loft can increase or decrease.  Wether or not it's "closed" or "open" depends only on how you orient the grip in your hands, you can grip it anyway you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This issue is a bit difficult to grasp, but does make sense. Remember, the only reason you would open or close a club face is because your swing does not square the club face at impact. Don't think about what the loft of the club looks like at address, but rather at impact. Here is my best shot at explaining:

If you have a hard time squaring your driver, you are either closing it at impact or leaving it open AT IMPACT. Let's start with leaving it open at impact. Closing the club face should help you square the club at impact, given you have the same swing. It is true that closing the club face at address looks like it de-lofts the club. But, you need to look what the club face is doing at impact. If in fact the closed club face is square at impact (which was the only reason you adjusted the club face to begin with), you had to have rotated the club face in the open direction compared to address, and you have added loft.

Here's how it work. A 10.5* driver that has a 2* closed face still measures 10.5* at address. If you return the face to the same position at impact as at address then the loft is still 10.5* (for simplicity sake not taking into account angle of attack or dynamic loft here). But if you square the face at impact you must have rotated the head 2* open which adds about 1.2* of loft. So the effective loft is then 11.7*.

The opposite is true for opening the club face. Yes it will decrease the loft.

Hope that helps!

  • Upvote 1

Driver : ping.gifG15 10.5* Serrano Stiff
3W: callaway.gif RAZR 15*
Hybrids : adams.gif A7 19*
4- PW : mizuno.gif MP - 63
Wedges : vokey.gif50*, 54*, 60*Putter: cameron.gif Scotty Newport 2.5Bag: sunmountain.gif 2011 SunMountain C-130

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 years later...

when you open the face by one degree at the start and bring it back to square at impact, you have decreased the loft by one degree.. you start from open to square..you can you tube it and it shows..its the exact opposite

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The following are the specs for the Razr Fit Tour Authentic Cally driver that I own:

C -   1.6° Closed  adds 1.1 to loft
C °   1.2° Closed +.8
C +   0.5° Closed +.5
S - 0.4° Closed +.3
S ° SQUARE *0
S +   0.7° Open -.3
O -   1.5° Open -.5
O °   2.0° Open -.8
O +   2.7° Open -1.1

I have my 9.5 set to S+ which has the club measuring 9.5 degrees of loft when the face is .7 degrees open. When the club comes through impact squared, (closed relative to the open position) the effective loft is now 9.2 degrees. Conversely, if the 9.5 degrees is in the closed position the club is opened through impact making the effective loft higher.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Rad Tour 16* | Tour Edge 19* | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Odyssey 2 Ball Blade | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Determining the "true" loft of an adjustable driver and describing how that changes with the various adjustment is by no means a simple matter. Attempts to do so methodically have only succeeded in muddying the waters even further, as far as I can tell.

http://wishongolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/adjustable-hosel-drivers.pdf

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Stretch

Determining the "true" loft of an adjustable driver and describing how that changes with the various adjustment is by no means a simple matter. Attempts to do so methodically have only succeeded in muddying the waters even further, as far as I can tell.

http://wishongolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/adjustable-hosel-drivers.pdf

Wishon is trying to screw with everyone's head.

The adjustments work - I tell people to adjust the drivers as the OEMs instruct and watch the ball flight, and adjust until you get the flight you want.

TM even has a decent app to assist with the R1 ... it works.

As to the OP, I suggest you try what Cobra suggests, they must have suggestions, and go from there based on the ball flight you see.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

the whole adjustable thing got to my mind really. Had a couple off bad weeks with the driver and 3 wood. always played them in neutral position.

went to change with settings and it got worse and worse. ending with no feel and confidence in my current R11.

Recently ordered new woods hopefully will be better after that. I ordered non adjustable driver and 3wood btw.

Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 and the 15 deg. 3wd. I had a fitting with these and damn i hit those well with the Fujikura Orochi Red Eye stiff shafts.

There is no driver on the marked that looks that nice behind the ball, square face, easy to align. well maybe the Titleist 913D2

The ball flight? goes high pretty damn high, but looking at it go up you still see it's not ballooning on you. the flight still looks penetrating.

Dirver: Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 65 g.
3 wood: Mizuno JPX 825 14 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 75 g.
Hybrid: Mizuno JPX 825 18 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 85 g. 
Irons: Mizuno MP 59 3 / PW KBS Tour stiff shaft ( Golf Pride Niion )
Wedges: Taylormade ATV Wedges 52 and 58 ( Golf Pride Niion )
putter: Taylormade ghost series 770 35 inch ( Super Stroke slim 3.0 )
Balls: Taylormade TP 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


the whole adjustable thing got to my mind really. Had a couple off bad weeks with the driver and 3 wood. always played them in neutral position. went to change with settings and it got worse and worse. ending with no feel and confidence in my current R11. Recently ordered new woods hopefully will be better after that. I ordered non adjustable driver and 3wood btw. Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 and the 15 deg. 3wd. I had a fitting with these and damn i hit those well with the Fujikura Orochi Red Eye stiff shafts. There is no driver on the marked that looks that nice behind the ball, square face, easy to align. well maybe the Titleist 913D2 The ball flight? goes high pretty damn high, but looking at it go up you still see it's not ballooning on you. the flight still looks penetrating.

You're in love Good luck with that But a black crown w a black face is not easy to align. There is no contrast Love is blind After the love is gone, go to trueaim.com good luck with it.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

the white lines on the clubface do that. It's not that i'm in love, well on mizuno irons i am. But that will all the mizuno MP users say.

Nothing softer than a Mizuno.

As for the driver i just had the best numbers on them, and the head shape is not my preferred look, little to triangular for me.

But heck with that it performs. High launch with low spin and it goes straight what more do you want from a driver.

Dirver: Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 65 g.
3 wood: Mizuno JPX 825 14 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 75 g.
Hybrid: Mizuno JPX 825 18 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 85 g. 
Irons: Mizuno MP 59 3 / PW KBS Tour stiff shaft ( Golf Pride Niion )
Wedges: Taylormade ATV Wedges 52 and 58 ( Golf Pride Niion )
putter: Taylormade ghost series 770 35 inch ( Super Stroke slim 3.0 )
Balls: Taylormade TP 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Oh, I was having fun with you. Good luck on your new equipment. One of my favorite drivers was a Mizuno MP001 With a Fuji speeder shaft with a soft tip The triangular shape is good, it will give you more stability on off-center hits Just be glad that the head is black. OEMs use a black head to hide the size. They found that black heads look smaller. I have found that the lighter colored heads are easier to aim if the face is contrasted to the color. That is why I prefer the white crown against a black face. I think that is one reason taylor-made got rid of the triangular shape, because the shape was easier to see when it was white and it was not as pleasing as a more rounded design But if you start aiming the driver a little too far to the right, try the true aim details. Comments indicate that they seem to work Enjoy

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I will and i do! Was on the range after work! And this just seems to work for me!

Dirver: Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 65 g.
3 wood: Mizuno JPX 825 14 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 75 g.
Hybrid: Mizuno JPX 825 18 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 85 g. 
Irons: Mizuno MP 59 3 / PW KBS Tour stiff shaft ( Golf Pride Niion )
Wedges: Taylormade ATV Wedges 52 and 58 ( Golf Pride Niion )
putter: Taylormade ghost series 770 35 inch ( Super Stroke slim 3.0 )
Balls: Taylormade TP 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is actually just a question regarding adjustable lofts.  I am thinking about purchasing a 17 degree titleist 913H and was wondering if I can easily adjust the loft myself...? or if I have to have someone do it for me professionally every single time?

Titleist 905R 8.5 Degree // Stiff
TaylorMade Rescue Mid 16 Degree// Stiff
Titleist 690.CB// PW-3 Rifle Flighted 6.5
Titleist Spin-Milled 56 Degree
Titleist Spin-Milled 60 Degree

Scotty Cameron Newport 2

Titleist Pro V1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The 913H is adjustable - and you can do it yourself. Ask for a free wrench when you purchase - ask them to throw it in the purchase Go to the Titleist site for full information on the adjustability of the club. They have a fitting matrix sheet for the clubs But if you want to change out the adjustable weight, you have two choices. You can go to EBay to find the particular weight or buy the Titleist adjustable weight kit.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

ohh alright thanks.  just another quick question.  I am currently using a 16 degree taylormade rescue 2h... and the titleist 913h comes in at a 17 degree at the lowest... so judging by the grid given on the titleist site, i can only go either .75 or 1.5 degrees up or down?  No way to get it to 16 degrees?

Titleist 905R 8.5 Degree // Stiff
TaylorMade Rescue Mid 16 Degree// Stiff
Titleist 690.CB// PW-3 Rifle Flighted 6.5
Titleist Spin-Milled 56 Degree
Titleist Spin-Milled 60 Degree

Scotty Cameron Newport 2

Titleist Pro V1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by cantputt

ohh alright thanks.  just another quick question.  I am currently using a 16 degree taylormade rescue 2h... and the titleist 913h comes in at a 17 degree at the lowest... so judging by the grid given on the titleist site, i can only go either .75 or 1.5 degrees up or down?  No way to get it to 16 degrees?

You can only decrease loft by .75, and increase loft in increments up to 1.5.

You can get to 16.25 - it's fine. You've got to account for shaft length and quality of shaft - the choice of stock Titleist shafts are better than what TM offers as stock.

Hit it and see what happens with ball flight, forgiveness, feel, consistency, and distance - that how to judge the club.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3969 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 135: 5/10/24 Putting and chipping practice. Good session putting through 50 mm gates.
    • Why should SuperSpeed get 3x of Stack's profits? I get the part about SuperSpeed wanting damages sustained as a result of Stack, but I don't get why SuperSpeed feels that they're entitled to both Stack's profits and damages.   Does anyone know/think SuperSpeed actually has a case here?
    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...