Jump to content
IGNORED

Importance of Camera Position in Golf Swing Video Analysis


Note: This thread is 3724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

  • Upvote 3

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Erik, I have a question on video analysis and interpreting the ball flight laws. Now that I have started using video to analyse swings, I have noticed that sometimes what I see on film after a shot doesn't match with how the ball flew. Let me explain. Occasionally, I'll hit a ball that starts off right of target and draws back to the target. So far so good, that's what I'm looking for (a push-draw).

However, when I look at the video I can see my swingpath is clearly out-to-in. How is this possible? If the camera is positioned correctly and I'm aimed correctly, even though it feels I have hit the ball in the middle of the clubface, must I conclude that I hit it off the toe and what I observed was the gear effect?

Or...occasionally, I'll notice that although I am clearly over the plane line with my arms and hands, the clubhead appears to strike the ball from under the plane line. Is this possible? Have I managed to come over the top and then manipulated the clubhead somehow to hit from the inside. Please clarify.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Administrator

  The_Pharaoh said:
Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

However, when I look at the video I can see my swingpath is clearly out-to-in. How is this possible? If the camera is positioned correctly and I'm aimed correctly, even though it feels I have hit the ball in the middle of the clubface, must I conclude that I hit it off the toe and what I observed was the gear effect?

That's unlikely. I'd like to see such a video. Most likely it's a case of this:


  The_Pharaoh said:
Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Or...occasionally, I'll notice that although I am clearly over the plane line with my arms and hands, the clubhead appears to strike the ball from under the plane line. Is this possible? Have I managed to come over the top and then manipulated the clubhead somehow to hit from the inside. Please clarify.

Good players all tend to do that if they get their arms out - they'll uncock the club and even bow their left wrists sometimes to keep the clubhead to the inside.

You can come "over the top" with your right shoulder, your left arm, your hands... or the clubhead. The latter is the only one that matters in terms of the ball flight.

Imagine in the pictures below Charlie's clubhead was in the same spot (both slightly under-plane) but his hands were a little above the plane. He'd be "over the top" with his arms/shoulders/hands but still be delivering the club from under the plane.

__1.jpg

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



  iacas said:
Originally Posted by iacas

Good players all tend to do that if they get their arms out - they'll uncock the club and even bow their left wrists sometimes to keep the clubhead to the inside.

You can come "over the top" with your right shoulder, your left arm, your hands... or the clubhead. The latter is the only one that matters in terms of the ball flight.


Ah OK, thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't sure if I was imagining things or had the camera in the wrong place! Still, it's a really bad way to hit the ball.

By the way, my feel isn't so off that I don't know the difference between hitting the ball in the middle of the face and off the toe. It's just I've heard so many stories about being just one dimple off and the differences it makes to the ball flight.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Moderator

Great explanation.  I can see what I have been doing wrong now.  Better videos to come....

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

  TN94z said:
Originally Posted by TN94z

Great explanation.  I can see what I have been doing wrong now.  Better videos to come....

Thanks.

The easiest way is to put a stick on the ground and make it vertical in the camera. Then put your toes against the stick. If you don't want to hit balls with the stick there, put tees near where your toes go or something.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Thanks Erik.  I have been positioning it more in the middle (incorrectly).

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 years later...

bumping...

Very helpful thread. What is the recommended height that the camera should be set up at?

IN MY BAG
Driver: Taylormade SLDR Mini Driver
3 Wood: Calloway RAZR Hawk
Hybrid: Ping 19*
Irons: Mizuno JPX 825
Wedges: 52, 56 Cleveland
Putter: Odyssey White Ice

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  divot dave said:
bumping...

Very helpful thread. What is the recommended height that the camera should be set up at?

Roughly hip or belly button height.  From "Filming Your Golf Swing"

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  The_Pharaoh said:

Erik, I have a question on video analysis and interpreting the ball flight laws. Now that I have started using video to analyse swings, I have noticed that sometimes what I see on film after a shot doesn't match with how the ball flew. Let me explain. Occasionally, I'll hit a ball that starts off right of target and draws back to the target. So far so good, that's what I'm looking for (a push-draw).

However, when I look at the video I can see my swingpath is clearly out-to-in. How is this possible?

1. First, consider that your video itself may not be accurate. Many cameras use a rolling shutter, which can cause some distortions with regard to high speed motion.

2. The "sweet spot" of the club as far as the ball coming off exactly straight may not be where you think the center is. And can depend on club design. And what happens on hits more towards the edges also varies depending on clubhead design. These effects shouldn't be large near the center, but just a few degrees might have you off by as much as 10 yards at target. So basically, you could even be slightly out in, with a draw, and still have the ball come off slightly right and draw back toward target, even with what you think is a center hit. So if you are talking about a shot being off a fairly small amount from your expectation, yes that is possible.


Roughly hip or belly button height.  From "Filming Your Golf Swing"

thx

IN MY BAG
Driver: Taylormade SLDR Mini Driver
3 Wood: Calloway RAZR Hawk
Hybrid: Ping 19*
Irons: Mizuno JPX 825
Wedges: 52, 56 Cleveland
Putter: Odyssey White Ice

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am not sure that's the announcers - that's more the producers. It's like the "oh and we're going to cut over to Joe Schmoe here who has a 90 foot putt for eagle on 7. He's +12 for the tournament, let's see what happens", gee I wonder. But they do cut around and show the putts that go in or the shots that go close.  One of my favorite announcers is Ken Brown. He played to a high standard and he's quite engaging too. Good combination. He is always talking about how difficult a shot the guy is about to play is. Player has a chip over a ridge and he'll say something along the lines of "this is such a difficult shot - if he can get this within 15 feet of the hole he's doing very well". Then they chip it to a foot and he starts gushing. That's almost the opposite. But it does add some excitement, especially if you don't know how hard the shot is, which, let's face it, is pretty tough to tell on television.  There are though definitely some (Miller was pretty "good" at this) who will create unreasonable expectations. Like "he'll be pretty upset if he doesn't get this inside 10 feet" from 100 yards away. On a somewhat separate note, that's why I always quite enjoyed it when they showed every shot Tiger hit. Gave you a much better idea of how the game is actually played. You could watch him some days and he'd do literally nothing spectacular all day, but you add it up and he's shot 67 and you question how he did it. Well, he did it by hitting almost all the greens, making birdies on the par 5s and holing a couple of 8 foot putts on the better approach shots.
    • It's not Scottie's fault the announcers keep saying that about him, that seems like a silly reason to root for someone else IMO.    I think announcers have at least somewhat of a role in giving amateur golfers unrealistic expectations for what a good shot is. They act like PGA Tour players should make every 8 foot putt and hit it inside 5 feet from 100yds when in reality they only make just over 50% of their 8 footers and tour average from 100yds is around 20 feet.
    • Touche'. Fair point. 
    • I used to find commentators really obnoxious like this, then I watched one of the online streams of the Masters (I think it was amen corner) that had someone commentating on it, but they were literally just stating the name of the player about to hit and their score and other drab stuff. It was so bland I couldn't watch it. Worse than nothing, but I did want to know some of the stuff they were talking about, which is something of a catch-22. I did realize that the commentary team have a pretty rough time of it and do a hard job and some of them do it better than you might realize. 
    • Okay, this is my opinion. But you really should consider getting data. No offense but human memory can be odd. Sometimes we make a long putt early on with our new putter and from that first impression onward you have a "putter that's good for long putts." We may miss our first two short ones and now you have "A putter that doesn't work for short putts". Sometimes these things even out over time, sometimes they don't, but it's often tough to break our first impressions of what's happening.  Plus, let's say that in fact it is true. You putt better from long distance with a broomstick and better from close up with a standard putter. Which one holds more weight? Here's an example. If your short putting is -5 SG (Strokes Gained) and your long putting is +5 SG does that mean your over all putting is 0 SG? What if your overall putting with one putter is -2 SG and +2 SG with the other putter? The answer to which putter should you use is of course is "It depends". BUT.... If you had SG (strokes gained) data for both putters you would know right away which putter is better for you. Or at least you'd have a better idea. This still doesn't take into account the difficulty of where you are playing, and/or the particular days in which you play. We've all had those putting days where it "feels" like everything you hit rolls in. AND... we've all had those days where it "feels" like you can't make a thing.  My best advice is get putting lessons. ... My second best advice is get data.  Unless you just want to get a new putter. Than go ahead. I love shiny things and I'd be the last person to claim I have never replaced a club that was working fine just because I wanted to get a new one. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...