Jump to content

19th Hole

  • entries
    4
  • comments
    66
  • views
    6,198

What every golfer can learn from Tiger Woods


mvmac

6,484 views

 Share

From a conversation I just had with a buddy. Couple things you can learn from the 14-time major champion.

1. It's possible to change the picture. 

He's done it several times now and a couple of them have been pretty significant. You can look at a video of his swing and spot whether it was his "Haney swing" or his "Harmon swing". Here's my take on how he does it, he expects and is determined to feel "uncomfortable". He's talked about this in interviews and I've seen in person how he goes about practicing. So many golfers ditch new swing thoughts because it doesn't "feel good "to them when they should be looking to feel uncomfortable! Of course changing a piece in your swing doesn't feel normal, you're changing a motor pattern. It'd be like changing something in the way you walk, it's going to feel like crap until it starts to become your new normal. 

Throughout the years we've all seen Tiger go through his slow rehearsals, on the range and on the course (especially after a bad shot). He "maps" out how he wants wants his body to move. Also, since he's hit thousands of balls with the old swing and to ingrain the new motion, he hits A LOT of balls forcing himself to do it the new way. I don't think every amateur has to hit thousands of balls but they'll probably have to make thousands of rehearsal/slow swings in order to see long term results. To make the change stick you're going to have to think about moving your body or a segment of your body in a specific way, you have to do it slowly and do it thousands of times. Seek out that uncomfortable feeling, because if it feels normal, you're not changing the picture.

2. Don't get caught up in a "style" of swing, focus on a priority. 

I think it's pretty common knowledge that Tiger loves to tinker with his swing. I think Como has him more focused on the important stuff now but certainly in the past he has gotten too concerned with how he wanted his swing to look rather than focusing on making it more efficient. Butch was actually against making all the changes to get to his "2000 swing" but Tiger was able to talk him into it. He wanted a swing where every position was perfect. With Haney it was the same line of thinking, except the definition of what was perfect changed. He bought into Haney's single plane theory and started rolling his forearms to a great degree on the backswing and had the club laid off at A4. With Foley it was about trying to look more like Grant Waite. And when it comes down to it, the changes were more "style" oriented: arms plane, forearm rotation rates, elbow location, his pivot/body stuff hasn't changed a great deal. 

Tiger is great at changing the picture but he's been changing it for the wrong reasons. It's based on the premise that if his swing looks "perfect" he won't hit bad shots. I think it's a good thing to always be working to improve but you can do that without rebuilding your golf swing over and over again. Rebuilding swings or starting from scratch is a complete waste of time and your natural tendencies tend to stay with you no matter what swing you adopt. Tiger has and will always have the head dip, it's just part of golf swing DNA.

 Share

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

Good stuff Mike!

So many golfers ditch new swing thoughts because it doesn't "feel good "to them when they should be looking to feel uncomfortable! Of course changing a piece in your swing doesn't feel normal, you're changing a motor pattern. It'd be like changing something in the way you walk, it's going to feel like crap until it starts to become your new normal. 

Whenever I'm at the range and thinking about giving up on a different feel, or by the same token, when I hear people haven't improved and I find out they gave up on [whatever priority piece you or Erik gave them] my TV/Movie brain always goes to the scene in the bar in 40 Year Old Virgin when Steve Carell's characters buddy is trying to get him to loosen up and go talk to girls and he says "It just doesn't feel right" so his buddy responds, "Of course it doesn't feel right!  What has felt right for you DON'T WORK!  Ya need to try some wrong, dog."

It's a joke, but it's 100% accurate and applies here as well. :beer:

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment

Great blog post.

I'll also add something I heard years ago, that "perfect is the enemy of good". That doesn't mean that you shouldn't work to improve, but that in all human endeavors, perfection is unattainable, and that in trying to be perfect, we can destroy what's good.

Link to comment

I used to be the guy on the range with the perfect swing and I just couldn't post the scores. I've been told several times I was the best range player in town. 

I dropped golf for a few years, I don't have the same amount of time to practice on my hand so now I only focus on results, made a couple of swing change to make my swing more reliable, some of them makes me look goofy. (Baseball grip and very narrow feet at address) 

Guess what?! my ball striking on the course is better than ever. 

The path to great golf is getting to know your swing and your limits. 

Edited by ygmondoux
Link to comment
  • Moderator

The path to great golf is getting to know your swing and your limits. 

Right, Hogan, Tiger, Jason Day, whoever, all have great swings but golfers set themselves up for failure by trying to "copy" swings. Learn from the commonalities of the great players, work with what you have and focus on eliminating or reducing the stuff that causes your ball striking problem.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

What I learned from TW is NOT to bulk-up on weights. I am convinced the result was a more limited flexibility and a changed muscle memory on a man that was fine tuned. For tennis players and golfers I believe weights are fine, if the target is strength and flexibility as opposed to "bulking up" like an NFL linebacker.

Positive side, TW's putting drills are excellent. 

Link to comment
  • Moderator

What I learned from TW is NOT to bulk-up on weights. I am convinced the result was a more limited flexibility and a changed muscle memory on a man that was fine tuned. For tennis players and golfers I believe weights are fine, if the target is strength and flexibility as opposed to "bulking up" like an NFL linebacker.

Kinda getting OT here but Tiger never did "bulk up" from lifting weights, he's never looked like an NFL linebacker. Most men are "bulkier" at 40 than they are at 20, it's just natural, even if you do stay in good shape. Tiger is just an average sized, fit looking guy. I've stood a few feet away from him several times in the past 2 1/2 years, definitely not a "big" guy.

Tiger won all of his tournaments while being active in the gym and lifting weights so I don't understand how that's something you learned not to do. If anything lifting properly improves flexibility There are a ton of golfers that lift weights, Jordan Spieth and Rory McIlroy being amount them.

nike-training-inner-strength-rory-mcilroScreen_Shot_2015-10-08_at_1.02.52_PM.thuScreen_Shot_2015-10-08_at_1.03.07_PM.thu

Edited by mvmac
Link to comment

Great post @mvmac. I am not a professional so I can't honestly say that my philosophy would be same if I were, but here's what I 'learnt' - have large amounts of faith and patience and focus on your swing improvements and goals. If you are a student, you will never run out of either. There are some unquestionable basics of golf in general - for eg. a slightly forward leaning shaft at impact is not 'customizable' basic tenant. But other than that it is ok for me to make finding my personal swing a long term pursuit. I think philosophically golf demands a progressive path at all times - of course for us non-professionals it is surely easier if you do not have the pressure of putting food on the table- shooting an odd 92 hurts nothing but my ego. Surely there are plenty of minds who think that is a slippery slope, which I agree and I personally was resistant to doing anything with mine. I was afraid to loose whatever little I had. But that changed once I understood laws of ball flight and found good guidance to help crystallize what path and priorities I should follow - INVALUABLE! I am still a very hard headed student and very slow in actually implementing picture changes but the path is still forward. Anyway, Tiger's path has been educational and a confirmation in that sense. For me, he is a philosophical model (maybe, I would think differently if I had a few majors in my trophy collection, but well.. uh.. let's just say, I don't). 

  

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • For years and years our league has used double-par as the maximum score to be entered on any one hole. It was used both for the competitive score as well as in the handicap calculation for our weekly net stroke play competition. The old “Equitable Stroke Control” figure was never used. Last year we changed to a maximum Net Double Bogey for the handicap calculation but we still used double-par as the max number for the gross score. For next season we’re thinking of changing to using NDB for both, but should we? Some are thinking we should still use double par for the weekly competition as NDB maybe gives an unfair advantage to the higher handicappers. That's what we're not certain about. The average handicap in our league is 18 (they range from 5-34) and there are usually one or two blow-up holes that occur each week, mostly by one of the higher handicappers, although there are a couple of difficult Par-3’s over water that could, and have, snagged everyone at one time or another. Regardless, although we're not sure, we’re guessing the overall impact of changing would be minimal because some of those net double bogey holes would end up at double par anyway.   Just curious, what do other leagues do? 
    • I voted for 1 but agree with the bolded text above.
    • You go out away from you too much to start. Thus, what it "causes" is for you to then go too much "around" you the rest of the backswing. This puts you in a "too shallow" position (notice where the shaft is pointing) and requires you to steepen it a precise amount exactly at the moment when you have a tremendous amount of force and very little time to act on the club (transition into the downswing). Weight WAY back in your heels. Hands go out away from you. Hands track around, club is super shallow and not pointing anywhere near the target line. Club MUST steepen in transition to get anywhere close to the ball. Bad time to do this. The driver swing is much worse, as at least with the irons you maintain something of a neutral shoulder tilt. Not so with the driver: Big trouble there. See this topic for your setup: You ain't Rickie. You're miles away from being able to "feel on the way down." You need to spend a lot of time on the first foot of your backswing, and then the first three feet, and then the next three feet… After you spend time on your setup.
    • This is a situation in which the Committee could have (should have?) defined the downed tree as GUR, in which case you would have been able to take free relief.  In my group of friends, we'd probably play it as GUR in a casual game.  Otherwise, a completely detached fallen tree is a loose impediment, you could have moved it (if possible) or even broken off part of it in order to make a swing.  If its still attached to the roots, you simply cannot do anything about it. But a question, in taking Unplayable Ball relief, couldn't you have gone back on the line and found a place where you could swing?  You don't have to take Lateral Relief and stay within 2 clublengths.
    • Last year some serious wind took down a tree and it was laying horizontally. Played that course a lot, for golf reasons, that day was the first time I ever hit one anywhere near that tree. Because of course it was.  It was under the fallen trunk/branches so much that even after taking an unplayable and relief I had no swing. It felt really dirty but the guy I was playing with said the fallen tree didn't have any option for free relief and since I had not realized it was under the tree from the box, and did not want to do the walk of shame on the first tee with multiple groups waiting...ugh. Sometimes the rules feel penal, but then I remember I am the one who made the sub-optimal swing in the first place. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. BookBoy
      BookBoy
      (51 years old)
    2. DrakeyDistiller
      DrakeyDistiller
      (59 years old)
    3. Fraser
      Fraser
      (38 years old)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...