Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1940 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have the R7 Driver that has much better dispersion than the M3, and I've tried the identical shaft in both heads? Has anyone tried a newish driver by 12 years and can't get any improvement in distance or dispersion, is this m3 head a lemon or it doesn't like purple ice shafts?


  • Administrator
Posted

Driver technology has, IMO, advanced in the past 12 years, but perhaps you respond well to the shape of it, the weight of it, or some other thing. There's a LOT that goes into this sort of stuff - the balance of the club is important, even.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, Colins69 said:

I have the R7 Driver that has much better dispersion than the M3, and I've tried the identical shaft in both heads? Has anyone tried a newish driver by 12 years and can't get any improvement in distance or dispersion, is this m3 head a lemon or it doesn't like purple ice shafts?

I have to confess I was a huge fan of the R7 driver. Personally I carried an R7 Quad for a quite few years. At that time I was in the camp that there was no reason to carry any non-Taylormade driver. Then came TWIST FACE! 

I hate the look of the twist face. Hate it. In my opinion if you fight a hook or a slice that twist face makes it LOOK like its going to make a million times worse. I've had sales guys explain how twist face is supposed to work in theory and it makes sense. But to my eye when I set it behind the ball it just looks like its going to hit it either out of bounds left or out of bounds right. It just doesn't work for me. 

I'm sure if you use a robot to hit shots with the M3 and the R7 you will be able to prove the M3 is more forgiving. But for me it doesn't work. Perhaps its the same for you. As @iacas said there's a lot that goes into how a driver performs for a human. If you are looking for a new driver, I'd suggest trying some other brands. Cobra and Ping always seem to be high performers for me, but to be honest there are so many good drivers out there, i think you are selling yourself short if you don't give a bunch of them a try. 

Good luck. 

 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
11 hours ago, Colins69 said:

I have the R7 Driver that has much better dispersion than the M3, and I've tried the identical shaft in both heads? Has anyone tried a newish driver by 12 years and can't get any improvement in distance or dispersion, is this m3 head a lemon or it doesn't like purple ice shafts?

It’s entirely possible the launch characteristics of the heads are different so you would actually need a different shaft in the M3.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, iacas said:

Driver technology has, IMO, advanced in the past 12 years, but perhaps you respond well to the shape of it, the weight of it, or some other thing. There's a LOT that goes into this sort of stuff - the balance of the club is important, even.

Agree with that, in the past I played tennis to a much better level than golf and only used a prince approach racket. Feel was important to me and I had my racket strung @45lb or kgs forget which but my coach said it was like an onion bag lol but it worked very good for me...


Posted
9 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I have to confess I was a huge fan of the R7 driver. Personally I carried an R7 Quad for a quite few years. At that time I was in the camp that there was no reason to carry any non-Taylormade driver. Then came TWIST FACE! 

I hate the look of the twist face. Hate it. In my opinion if you fight a hook or a slice that twist face makes it LOOK like its going to make a million times worse. I've had sales guys explain how twist face is supposed to work in theory and it makes sense. But to my eye when I set it behind the ball it just looks like its going to hit it either out of bounds left or out of bounds right. It just doesn't work for me. 

I'm sure if you use a robot to hit shots with the M3 and the R7 you will be able to prove the M3 is more forgiving. But for me it doesn't work. Perhaps its the same for you. As @iacas said there's a lot that goes into how a driver performs for a human. If you are looking for a new driver, I'd suggest trying some other brands. Cobra and Ping always seem to be high performers for me, but to be honest there are so many good drivers out there, i think you are selling yourself short if you don't give a bunch of them a try. 

Good luck. 

 

Appreciate your advice, and your right I can try other brands. I’m not a one brand guy, I use them all lol. Besides the r7 driver I have Ping i20 Nickent Callaway Titliest and others I forget lol, all part of the learning curve for me. Happy holidays to all...

10 hours ago, billchao said:

It’s entirely possible the launch characteristics of the heads are different so you would actually need a different shaft in the M3.

I did wonder about that, I asked at the range about trying different shafts for the m3 but they don’t stock them but will order them for me. Yeah right don’t think so, anyway I’ve sold my m3 for what I paid 2 years ago so all good,,,


Posted
13 hours ago, Colins69 said:

anyway I’ve sold my m3 for what I paid 2 years ago so all good,,,

Nice! 

Good deal for you.

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Note: This thread is 1940 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I mean, if you like GZ, and would drink it more often during a round than water, then keep drinking that. If you walk 18 holes, on a hot summer day, and drink 2 20-oz waters or 4 20-oz GZ. You will benefit more from the 4 20-oz GZ because it's like 99.99% water, lol. Yea, if flavored water makes you drink more water, then that works better.  I would just monitor the salt intake relative to your own health. I am sure some people might have to be careful. GZ is 280 mg salt. So, 4 of those is over 1000 mg. It is over 4 hours. That is like half the daily recommended intake of salt. You are probably losing some of your salt reserves playing golf. Long winded way of saying, it depends on the person.   
    • My first few years playing golf, I'd take a 32 oz Gatorade (probably pre-zero;  almost certainly Gatorade Tiger when that was a thing) with me in my bag, but I'd otherwise take water (in about the volumes I take now).  From your post, it seems like going back to something like that might be a better idea for me -- primarily water (maybe with some fruit or mint leaves thrown in for flavor) and one bottle of sports drink, rather than a diluted sports drink across all I'm drinking?
    • Yesterday evening, I watched The Gentlemen, a Guy Ritchie film from 2019 that I evidently missed on first pass.  It's a par, but it's a par on one of those long par-4s where the par feels like a birdie. It's in a similar vein to some other movies like Lock Stock, Snatch, or Layer Cake (which was Vaughn, not Ritchie).  If you liked those, I think you'll like this.   A friend suggested it a few months ago, and I started it one night and couldn't finish because I was having trouble following.  In retrospect, that was an artifact of trying to watch the movie too late in the day.  I started the movie at the beginning earlier yesterday and got to enjoy the full thing very much, but unlike some other movies, I encourage anyone to watch this when they're awake enough to catch which characters are which.  In my case, watching with subtitles helped me understand what some characters were saying. 
    • Sweat contains about 800 to 1500 mg per liter. For me, about 45 minutes of moderately intense workout had me lose about 3-lbs of water weight. That is about 1-liter. Now, a thing you need consider how much salt you are getting from food. Humans have been perfectly fine eating food with extra salt added. Typically, people would get 500 to 1000 mg of salt just from eating whole foods. Most people eat processed foods, which have more salt. So, we probably are not salt deprived. We are constantly digesting food we eat and taking in that salt. Unless you are fasting, and working out, you probably are slowly getting salt back into your body.  I will say electrolyte powder is probably beneficial for people for intense training or long endurance activities in the perspective of improving fluid retention (helps in recovery) and preventing cramping. I would say, just drinking water is way more important in general. For something like running marathons, absolutely beneficial. For golf, this is a marginal benefit.  In terms of ideal electrolyte ratios, you want to be in the 2:1 to 4:1 sodium to potassium ratio. Though, I have also seen ratios closer to 20:1. This mechanism is vital for nerve impulses, cell volume control, and kidney functions. Potassium is essential for muscle contractions. Magnesium is good for muscles function as well.  Ultima Replenisher: 55mg salt, 250mg potassium, 100mg magnesium.  *Probably good for people who don't eat a lot of whole foods, or foods with a lot salt. Probably one in the same, lol.  LiquidIV: 500mg salt, 370mg potassium, no magnesium.  LMNT: 1000mg salt, 200mg potassium, 60mg magnesium. Skratch: 400mg salt, 50mg potassium, 50mg magnesium.  Transparent Labs: 500mg salt, 250mg potassium, 50mg magnesium. If I had to choose one, I would probably go with Skratch. My diet isn't 100% whole foods, so I get plenty of salt.  Note, if you have kidney issues, I would be wary of adding excessive salt. Salt can be very hard on the kidneys, and you might be negating the benefits of drinking that water. 
    • I ran the nutrients for Ultima Replenisher  by my friend who is nutritionist. She said it was a decent breakdown. So I bought the berry and lemonade packs at Target. Will give a try on the course today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.