Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Anyone Bothered by the Normalizing of Gambling With the PGA Tour?


Note: This thread is 1834 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know you can bet on other sports and golf for a long time but when betting goes mainstream and embraced by the PGA then I am very uneasy about it. If the betting amounts get big enough, it can lead to corruption. I have a gambling addict in the family so I am very much against gambling.

Irons: 0.5 inch short and 2* Flat Mavrik 5 to AW (AW-105, PW-120, 9-135, 8-145) The lofts for these clubs are about 3* to 5* stronger  than standard.

Wedges: Mizuno MP-R series 52* and 56*. (80, 60)

Nickent: 4DX 2 hybrid 17* and 4 hybrid 23* (185 and 170 carry)

3 Wood: Tour Edge XGC 13* (195 carry)

Driver: Callaway FT IZ Driver 9* (210 carry, ~230 total)


Posted
1 hour ago, khalespace said:

I know you can bet on other sports and golf for a long time but when betting goes mainstream and embraced by the PGA then I am very uneasy about it. If the betting amounts get big enough, it can lead to corruption. I have a gambling addict in the family so I am very much against gambling.

I'm an alcoholic, but I can't really rail against the alcohol companies' involvement in every major sport in the planet, can I?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, colin007 said:

I'm an alcoholic, but I can't really rail against the alcohol companies' involvement in every major sport in the planet, can I?

No, but with a gambling addict the sport can become about the betting. If a brewery sponsors your team that is a source of income, not a diversion from the purity of the sport. Obviously there is  a downside in terms of the promotion of what can be an unhealthy product, but unlike tobacco, which, happily, has been run out of sport, there is a level of consumption that is not harmful.

Edited by Shorty

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

I’m not too worried about it affecting the play, at least at the top level, but I won’t be surprised if some players try to take advantage.

What I don’t like is how gambling has become one of the main advertisement businesses in sports, not just golf. It’s a legitimate business, but I don’t care for it.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, Zeph said:

but I won’t be surprised if some players try to take advantage.

The only way that I can see a player taking advantage is to deliberately LOSE a tournament. That would probably lead to a lifetime ban, so I don't see it happening.

Backing yourself to win is not "taking advantage" in a bad way.

Team sports have betting on all sorts of side issues within the game. Golfers aren't going to play the system by, say, shooting 9 under for the back 9 to win.

But if they stood more to win by backing player B against their own prizemoney and commercial rewards for a win and threw a tournament it would be taking advantage. Not going to happen.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

I think the Ryder Cup or President Cup format is where players can intentionally lose a match if the number of bets heavily favor one side.

Irons: 0.5 inch short and 2* Flat Mavrik 5 to AW (AW-105, PW-120, 9-135, 8-145) The lofts for these clubs are about 3* to 5* stronger  than standard.

Wedges: Mizuno MP-R series 52* and 56*. (80, 60)

Nickent: 4DX 2 hybrid 17* and 4 hybrid 23* (185 and 170 carry)

3 Wood: Tour Edge XGC 13* (195 carry)

Driver: Callaway FT IZ Driver 9* (210 carry, ~230 total)


  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Shorty said:

The only way that I can see a player taking advantage is to deliberately LOSE a tournament. That would probably lead to a lifetime ban, so I don't see it happening.

Backing yourself to win is not "taking advantage" in a bad way.

There could be a bet where a player is given some shots. Like taking the Bengals +11 or something. And a player could still win an event but drop some shots coming in to cover the spread (or fail to cover the spread).

That's pretty involved and I'd rate it as pretty unlikely, but the more money involved, the more likely it becomes.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, Shorty said:

The only way that I can see a player taking advantage is to deliberately LOSE a tournament. That would probably lead to a lifetime ban, so I don't see it happening.

Backing yourself to win is not "taking advantage" in a bad way.

Team sports have betting on all sorts of side issues within the game. Golfers aren't going to play the system by, say, shooting 9 under for the back 9 to win.

But if they stood more to win by backing player B against their own prizemoney and commercial rewards for a win and threw a tournament it would be taking advantage. Not going to happen.

There are many ways to bet and a deliberate poor performance is easy to pull off. A few poor shots might make a bet come in.

There are lots of players on the tours that don’t make a lot of money and aren’t in the top 30 all that often. Someone might be tempted to find other ways to make some money.

There are many ways to deliberately change your score and more likely to happen lower on the leaderboards. I’m not worried about someone with a position to win a tournament, but that is just a few players each tournament. The majority don’t stand a chance on Sunday.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, Zeph said:

There are many ways to deliberately change your score and more likely to happen lower on the leaderboards. I’m not worried about someone with a position to win a tournament, but that is just a few players each tournament. The majority don’t stand a chance on Sunday.

I can see your concern. I agree at the top of the board it's probably unlikely. Prop bets are also limited in how much money can be wagered just to prevent this sort of thing. 

At the bottom or near the bottom of the board will still be challenging. The players nearer the cut line tee off first, there are a lot of moving parts to consider in order to convincingly point shave in golf. I'm not saying it can't be done, but the mathematics of it will be challenging. 

 

On 4/30/2021 at 9:38 AM, David in FL said:

You’ve been able to bet on virtually every aspect of a PGA tour event for as long as I can remember.  Granted, the Internet has made it a bit easier and more visible, but make no mistake it’s always been available. Just walk into any sports book in any casino…

So no. DraftKings, the latest form of the same old thing, isn’t going to change anything. It’s certainly not going to cause a tour pro to take a dive.

I was making prop bets on line ten years ago. But the difference is now the "live" betting aspect. 

I really think the biggest concern comes not from the guys in the tournament trying to rig numbers or intentionally miss putts or fairways. I think the biggest concern is Joe Idiot in the gallery making an instantaneous prop bet that Dustin Johnson misses the next fairway and then screaming at him in his backswing. (By the way, I believe trying to influence a prop bet is a criminal offense.) But I could see where some drunk idiot will try it. Once one or two idiots try it and land their dumb asses in jail I think the problem will go away. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1834 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
    • I managed to knock off a 3, a 13, and a 15 a couple of weeks ago. The 3 was a 185 yard par 3 with a 6 iron to 12 feet. 13 was a 350 yard par 4, which was a 2 iron and a 9 iron to about a foot. 15 was a 560 yard par 5 with a driver in a bunker, 4 iron into the semi, gap wedge to 8 feet and a putt.
    • Wordle 1,789 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.