Jump to content
IGNORED

Ear Plugs


bkuehn1952
Note: This thread is 918 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I played in a tournament with an interesting player recently.  This guy was a bundle of Obsessive/Compulsive mannerisms.  He easily took 45+ seconds to hit every shot as he went through a series of movements.  On top of all that, he talked unusually loud.  Eventually I noted that he was wearing ear plugs.  They were not hearing aids or blue tooth ear pieces, just plain ear plugs.

At first I wondered about how the Rules of Golf might view intentionally reducing ambient noises with something artificial. (ear plugs)  Ultimately, I decided there was no issue.  If he were wearing white noise headphones, that might be a breach but just stuffing something into your ear cavity was okay.  So we just played on and I shouted at him when I needed him to hear. 

  • Funny 1

Brian Kuehn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My first thought would have been to ignore the issue like yourself.   There may have been mental issues and ear plugs allowed him to play instead of sitting out.   The rules wouldn't agree with that but unless it's a major tournament, I'm not challenging the issue.    

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, bkuehn1952 said:

I played in a tournament with an interesting player recently.  This guy was a bundle of Obsessive/Compulsive mannerisms.  He easily took 45+ seconds to hit every shot as he went through a series of movements.  On top of all that, he talked unusually loud.  Eventually I noted that he was wearing ear plugs.  They were not hearing aids or blue tooth ear pieces, just plain ear plugs.

At first I wondered about how the Rules of Golf might view intentionally reducing ambient noises with something artificial. (ear plugs)  Ultimately, I decided there was no issue.  If he were wearing white noise headphones, that might be a breach but just stuffing something into your ear cavity was okay.  So we just played on and I shouted at him when I needed him to hear. 

An interesting issue.

Rules do not specifically mention ear plugs but under 4.3a(4) an action not allowed is listening to music to eliminate distractions. As ear plugs are used for the same purpose I would say using them is a breach of R4.3a. Unless there is a medical reason for using them.

  • Upvote 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
2 hours ago, Ruler said:

An interesting issue.

Rules do not specifically mention ear plugs but under 4.3a(4) an action not allowed is listening to music to eliminate distractions. As ear plugs are used for the same purpose I would say using them is a breach of R4.3a. Unless there is a medical reason for using them.

That's how I would vote.

If you've got cotton in your ears for a medical reason, I'd check with the Committee first, so they're aware and can rule (a doctor's note or something should suffice there).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Good points with the analogy of music/headphones (prohibited) and ear plugs both being efforts to eliminate distractions.  I thought about a person with hearing aids.  He could turn them off (or down) or even remove them and achieve the same result but no one would likely think to penalize that person.

People wear all sorts of items in hopes it will improve their results.  There are many non-prescription sunglasses that claim improved sight.  I wonder if someone went to the trouble of installing blinders (like some carriage horses) on their sunglasses, if the ruling bodies would step in.

I have asked the USGA about ear plugs to see what they say.

Edited by bkuehn1952

Brian Kuehn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

42 minutes ago, bkuehn1952 said:

I thought about a person with hearing aids.  He could turn them off (or down) or even remove them and achieve the same result but no one would likely think to penalize that person.

But he/she would never hear the shouted "FORE!!!"  Or the "You're still away."
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, bkuehn1952 said:

...  He could turn them off (or down) or even remove them and achieve the same result but no one would likely think to penalize that person.

 

I wear hearing aids with hard acrylic plugs and I have turned my aids off on the course and the aids essentially become plugs.  No one would be able to tell if they were off.

45 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

But he/she would never hear the shouted "FORE!!!"  Or the "You're still away."
 

Depending on how far away someone who yelled FORE was I may not hear anything other than noise even if I had my aids on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 minutes ago, Hohjoe said:

I wear hearing aids with hard acrylic plugs and I have turned my aids off on the course and the aids essentially become plugs.  No one would be able to tell if they were off.

But #1... I want to converse with you on the course instead of getting, "Huh?  What did you say?"

And #2... the guy who shouts "Fore" and then hits you is going to wonder what the deal is.  Legally, you probably couldn't sue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

But #1... I want to converse with you on the course instead of getting, "Huh?  What did you say?"

And #2... the guy who shouts "Fore" and then hits you is going to wonder what the deal is.  Legally, you probably couldn't sue.

If I on the course with someone I want to converse with, then I wouldn't turn them off. Once on a crowded course I was stuck with a threesome and they talked among themselves and ignored me. One guy had a really annoying laugh, so I just turned the aids off and watched for nods and hand motions for me to hit.

 

I played this past Thursday, aids on, and I was on the tee box for 11 which is parallel to the green for 10, a short par 3. I hit and turned toward the cart and there was a ball 2-3 yards to my right in the tee box area. I looked at the tee box for 10 and a lady was standing there watching me. If she yelled anything I didn't hear it even with the aids on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


28 minutes ago, Hohjoe said:

I wear hearing aids with hard acrylic plugs and I have turned my aids off on the course and the aids essentially become plugs.  No one would be able to tell if they were off.

You would.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I asked the opinion of two experienced referees and both said that using ear plugs to eliminate distractions would fall under R4.3a(4) as being analogous to listening music with the same purpose.

Any comments?

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


22 hours ago, Ruler said:

I asked the opinion of two experienced referees and both said that using ear plugs to eliminate distractions would fall under R4.3a(4) as being analogous to listening music with the same purpose.

Any comments?

I would rather wait for one of the RBs to comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


16 hours ago, Rulesman said:

I would rather wait for one of the RBs to comment.

So if that would happen in a competition where you are the referee you would wait for the RBs to answer? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


26 minutes ago, Ruler said:

So if that would happen in a competition where you are the referee you would wait for the RBs to answer? 

You only asked for a comment.

But I would ask the players 'Why?'

Edited by Rulesman
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 918 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...