Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

GEARS: What do the Arms do in the Golf Swing?


Note: This thread is 1525 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Not much!

In the latest version of the GEARS software, you can draw an "axis" (a trim-colored graphic that points in the X, Y, and Z direction) relative to every body segment.

In the images below, I've matched up the torso so that the camera is viewing the torso from the same angle and I've taken a photo of the arms from both angles - setup and the top of the backswing - to illustrate what the arms do (relative to the torso/chest) during the backswing.

This is it. This is all the arms do in the backswing:

arms_DL.jpgarms_FO.jpg

That's it. They:

  • Lift (at the shoulders).
  • Bend (the right elbow, often ideally < 90°).
  • Hinge (at the wrists).
  • Roll (slightly, or the club would be across the line at the top).

It's not much.

P.S. That's a four-time major winner right there.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 3

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
51 minutes ago, iacas said:

< 90°

Is this supposed to say >, or am I misinterpreting the information. I used to have a training device that essentially stopped the bend at 90 degrees, so the angle could not get smaller, and I thought this was a good thing to do (not collapse right arm bend).

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
19 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

Is this supposed to say >, or am I misinterpreting the information. I used to have a training device that essentially stopped the bend at 90 degrees, so the angle could not get smaller, and I thought this was a good thing to do (not collapse right arm bend).

You're misinterpreting.

I said "bend < 90°." As in if you have a straight-ish elbow and you "bend" it 45°, it's "bent" 45°.

The actual angle would be 135°, but it's "bent" 45°.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Dude’s got four arms!

You posted a video a while back showing this too. Thanks.

  • Funny 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, iacas said:

As in if you have a straight-ish elbow and you "bend" it 45°, it's "bent" 45°.

Makes sense now, start at 180, don't bend past 90, not the angle of the right arm bend at completion of backswing. Thanks for clarifying.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Now do one with someone sitting in the spinning office chair, lol.

So the arms don't do as much you'd guess but they do contribute a lot to club head speed, see the swings from off the knees? It's just that that speed/power is concentrated in those few moves? I remember something here about how the arms contribute to power more than you'd think, when ground reaction forces got a lot of attention. That's why I mentioned the office chair, there was a video of David Wedzik or someone taking a swing sitting in a chair getting a good amount of distance just from the arms.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
5 hours ago, nevets88 said:

So the arms don't as much you'd guess but they do contribute a lot to club head speed, see the swings from off the knees? It's just that that speed/power is concentrated in those few moves? I remember something here about how the arms contribute to power more than you'd think, when ground reaction forces got a lot of attention. That's why I mentioned the office chair, there was a video of David Wedzik or someone taking a swing sitting in a chair getting a good amount of distance just from the arms.

Yeah, I've been thinking of how to kind of reconcile the stuff. For now, I'll say this:

  • You can't make a very good swing with the right elbow staying straight, the wrists not doing much, etc.
  • You can't make a very good swing ONLY by using your arms (though you can make a fast one).
  • The arms don't do "much" but they work up and down FAST. This is a "multiplier" to the rotation, of sorts.

The video with the chair was mainly about GRF, not about how you "should" swing your arms. (Much too much "around" in those swings.)

  • Thumbs Up 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  • Thumbs Up 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Huge unlock for me around this was this AMG video. Short version is your only joint/bone connection between your arms and the rest of your body is the sternoclavicular (SC) joint where the collar bones attach to the sternum (green bit in the pic). At setup you've got ~90˚ between your arm and collar bone. Good players don't change that early in the swing. You can get past A2 without changing it at all by hinging the SC joint (push your shoulder forward and slide your shoulder blade away from the spine). This is what allows you to get good rotation while keeping the trail arm <90˚ bent, with the pro in the video only getting to 70˚. For me this was a revelation. So much less movement to time!

sc_joint.jpg

 

 

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Is that the video you meant to link to? It doesn't have any angular measurements like the adduction angle, etc. It just talks about how the left shoulder works, not the arms, really.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 hours ago, iacas said:

Is that the video you meant to link to? It doesn't have any angular measurements like the adduction angle, etc. It just talks about how the left shoulder works, not the arms, really.

Whoops. Yeah posted the wrong one.

 

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I thought you might be referencing…

This image says it:

arm_adduction.jpg

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1525 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.