Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I work at a golf store that has simulators. They are not going to be 100% accurate and should be used to get a feel for your average distances. Rather, they are best for comparing clubs when considoring a new purchase because both clubs with be at the same playing feild.
Driver: Titleist 909 D2 (VooDoo shaft)
Woods: Titleist 909 D3 (15 deg, VooDoo shaft)
Hybrids: Mizuno MX700 (20 deg)
Irons: Titleist ZB (4-pw)
Wedge:
Titleist Vokey 52°, 56°, 60°Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Select NewportPutter Cover: Scotty Cameron 2009 Cupid Dog -WhiteBalls: Srixon Z-Star

Posted
I would only use the numbers as far as swing speed, launch, ball speed and maybe backspin. I got fitted for a ball at golf galaxy and the ball they fitted me for helped. I created less spin with my driver and got a better performing ball. As far as distance my friend was hitting a sand wedge 160. Who knows?

Posted
my carry on a simulator that I use to measure has me carrying the ball at 260 - 270 yards on avg. i know i'm not swinging that fast when i'm testing clubs...especially the 1st 10 swings that i'm testing...
that carry is about my avg drive...so i think the sim i use a bunch has me a little higher than reality...would be nice if I could carry 270 on the reg without trying to crank it.
DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

  • Moderator
Posted
thats awesome buddy but your ball is Platinum..... not platimun....

Sorry about that. Sometimes I type too fast.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The only accurate reading you should trust is what you do off of the first through eighteenth tee boxes. The rest is hogwash.

Beautifully Put!!!!

Simulators are just that "SIMULATORS" They simulate you right into buying a club, becuase you "hit it so good at the simulator" any shop worth their salt will let you at least hit it outside. If not then they obviously dont want your business.

:taylormade: R9 9.5d with Fujikura Motore 65 Stiff
ss-07 13deg 3 wood Graphite Design Purple Ice 85-S
Md-17 1i/4w UST V2 Tour Hybrid X
A3 Pro 20 Tour Prototype Mitsubishi Javln X
MP 57 4,5,6 Project X 6.5 MP 67 7,8,9 Project X 6.5 Vokey 200 series 48d Project X satin 6.5/ Vokey 09SMTC 54.11...


Posted
According to golf galaxy's simulator i hit a 6 iron 210 yards. lol....I belive the retail store sims are geared towards getting you to fall in love with a club rather than tell you how you are acutally hitting it. When i was hitting the nike VR 6 iron i knew i strait up sawed off this one swing to the right. The simulator classified it as a "push" that still went 175...please.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
While I agree 100% that simulators aren't the most accurate thing but I do think they are accurate enuff to tell u the correct trajectory and your angles. Just don't put too much stock in the distant readings. What I don't believe is people saying that they are only in use to get people to buy a certain club. The simulators can't discriminate towards one club over the next. The simulator has no idea whether you hitting a $100 set from walmart or a set of Pings or Callaways.

Posted
The only thing they are good for are for comparing apples to apples. If it says you hit the X Club better than you hit the Y Club then you probably do. But don't put any stock in the numbers you are provided.


 


Posted
I'm playing on a simulator where you can't test equipment. It's not part of any merchandiser store. The distances are fine tuned and they match my distances on the course pretty well. I don't use the distances as references, but angles and trajectory is great to work on. You can tell if you hit a shot to the left, right or centre. You can play all kinds of shots on it.

During the winter I have no chance of playing outside, playing on the simulator has been very useful for my swing. The last changes I have made on the simulator and the results were great.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 years later...
Posted
Thinking about going up to the local driving range and using the unlimited golf balls deal for $15.00. they also throw in Flightscope to help with your swing. so my question is has anyone used this before? also do you feel it is accurate or helps you? or is it a waste of time? thanks for the help.

Driver: R11s - 3wood: RBZ - MIzuno 2 iron - rons: taylormade burner 2.0 4-pw - 63 degree: nike VR Forged - 52 Degree: nike VR Forged - 60 degree: callaway - Putter: odyssey white ice 2 ball I'm going to qualify for the U.S. Open and kick your boyfriend's ass. Whatever you think of me, you should know he hates old people, children, and dogs. Roy McAvoy.


Posted
Thinking about going up to the local driving range and using the unlimited golf balls deal for $15.00. they also throw in Flightscope to help with your swing. so my question is has anyone used this before? also do you feel it is accurate or helps you? or is it a waste of time? thanks for the help.

The flight scope is a very good tool, between flight scope and track man launch monitors inmo those are the two popular ones used by professionals and club manufacturers alike. Of the 1000s of club and driver fittings I have used the flight scope the most and I have found it to match my own on course distances and ball flight......it will pick up when you are getting tired of hitting multiple buckets, so warm up first maybe with 25 balls then get some readings. Good luck


  • 10 months later...
Posted

I played a simulator today and was a bit surprised by the seemingly increased distances. While I don't put a 100% faith in these things, I asked the owner if the sims were close and he told me the irons are dead on with his distances on the course (he's a low single-digit player).

He told me the same thing last year when my son was hitting what seemed to be very good distances (at that time, my simulator numbers were consistent with my real distances). When my son and I played the first round of the year, I measured one of his 4 iron shots with the GPS and it was within 5 yards of what the sims indicated.

It wasn't like I would get an occasional odd number today. Every iron in the bag was considerably longer on almost every shot. And the fact my driver distances were consistently lower leads me to believe that the simulator wasn't that far off (that was definitely me).

So I'm wondering if the work on key#2 can possibly provide this much extra distance - easily 20 yards with my mid to long irons. Or if these results were just a combination of hitting off a mat and the simulator being just a bit longer than reality.

Has anyone else experienced this kind of improvement from getting weight and hands forward?

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I played a simulator today and was a bit surprised by the seemingly increased distances. While I don't put a 100% faith in these things, I asked the owner if the sims were close and he told me the irons are dead on with his distances on the course (he's a low single-digit player).

He told me the same thing last year when my son was hitting what seemed to be very good distances (at that time, my simulator numbers were consistent with my real distances). When my son and I played the first round of the year, I measured one of his 4 iron shots with the GPS and it was within 5 yards of what the sims indicated.

It wasn't like I would get an occasional odd number today. Every iron in the bag was considerably longer on almost every shot. And the fact my driver distances were consistently lower leads me to believe that the simulator wasn't that far off (that was definitely me).

So I'm wondering if the work on key#2 can possibly provide this much extra distance - easily 20 yards with my mid to long irons. Or if these results were just a combination of hitting off a mat and the simulator being just a bit longer than reality.

Has anyone else experienced this kind of improvement from getting weight and hands forward?

Sure, you're putting your body weight behind the swing.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I played a simulator today and was a bit surprised by the seemingly increased distances.

...easily 20 yards with my mid to long irons.

Just wanted to follow up on my previous post. I call BS on the simulator.

All the snow melted this weekend and I was able to hit outside into field next to my house. Using Google maps, I measured my shots and discovered there wasn't any gain in distances. So either my swing has reverted since last week or the simulator was off.

All this means is that I can't trust anything but what I see. The simulator is fun and I'll keep using it through the winter, but not as a tool to evaluate progress.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonMA1

I played a simulator today and was a bit surprised by the seemingly increased distances.

...easily 20 yards with my mid to long irons.

Just wanted to follow up on my previous post. I call BS on the simulator.

All the snow melted this weekend and I was able to hit outside into field next to my house. Using Google maps, I measured my shots and discovered there wasn't any gain in distances. So either my swing has reverted since last week or the simulator was off.

All this means is that I can't trust anything but what I see. The simulator is fun and I'll keep using it through the winter, but not as a tool to evaluate progress.

What simulator are you using, that you can use all winter?

While I agree that a simulator might be inaccurate, your test was possibly skewed by cold weather. Remember that in the winter the balls don't compress as much and could account for 4-5 yards out of 200 or so yards. The cold air is also denser and could also account for another 8-10 yards or so. http://thesandtrap.com/t/57517/how-much-does-cold-air-actually-affect-your-distance

Plus, this might be a stupid question, but did the simulator result include roll? I know where I am you don;t get much roll because the balls tend to plug in the damper ground conditions.

  • Like 1

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

What simulator are you using, that you can use all winter?

While I agree that a simulator might be inaccurate, your test was possibly skewed by cold weather. Remember that in the winter the balls don't compress as much and could account for 4-5 yards out of 200 or so yards. The cold air is also denser and could also account for another 8-10 yards or so. http://thesandtrap.com/t/57517/how-much-does-cold-air-actually-affect-your-distance

Plus, this might be a stupid question, but did the simulator result include roll? I know where I am you don;t get much roll because the balls tend to plug in the damper ground conditions.

I believe they are "Trugolf" simulators. They use E6 software anyway. Yes, those numbers include roll.

You're exactly right about the ground I'm hitting into being very soft. While I can't see them land (my view is obscured by trees), I don't think they get more than a few yards of roll.

The temps have been in the low 40's.

But still...

When I posted an additional 20 yards of distance at the simulator, that was very conservative. I'm not a long hitter. Towards the end of the 2014 seasons, I was pretty happy with a couple of 170+ yd 5i shots I'd hit (measured with a Garmin). But my average 5i was probably just at 160. So when I started hitting 190 yard 5 irons shots last week at the simulator (one exceeded 200 yards), that seemed too good to be true.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if next season I'm averaging 180yds with my 5 irons and getting 10 yard gaps from there down. But I just don't think it will happen. Today I was averaging below 150 yards with only a couple reaching 160. The ball flight was higher than it should have been, so it may have been partly my swing (not getting my hands forward I would suspect). At least contact was consistently clean.

This just gives me a bit more incentive to keep working on the changes I need to put in place.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
[QUOTE name="Lihu" url="/t/18523/golf-simulator-accuracy/18#post_1085577"]   What simulator are you using, that you can use all winter? While I agree that a simulator might be inaccurate, your test was possibly skewed by cold weather. Remember that in the winter the balls don't compress as much and could account for 4-5 yards out of 200 or so yards. The cold air is also denser and could also account for another 8-10 yards or so. [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/t/57517/how-much-does-cold-air-actually-affect-your-distance]http://thesandtrap.com/t/57517/how-much-does-cold-air-actually-affect-your-distance[/URL] Plus, this might be a stupid question, but did the simulator result include roll? I know where I am you don;t get much roll because the balls tend to plug in the damper ground conditions. [/QUOTE] I believe they are "Trugolf" simulators. They use E6 software anyway. Yes, those numbers include roll.  You're exactly right about the ground I'm hitting into being very soft. While I can't see them land (my view is obscured by trees), I don't think they get more than a few yards of roll. The temps have been in the low 40's. But still... When I posted an additional 20 yards of distance at the simulator, that was very conservative. I'm not a long hitter. Towards the end of the 2014 seasons, I was pretty happy with a couple of 170+ yd 5i shots I'd hit (measured with a Garmin). But my average 5i was probably just at 160. So when I started hitting 190 yard 5 irons shots last week at the simulator (one exceeded 200 yards), that seemed too good to be true. Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if next season I'm averaging 180yds with my 5 irons and getting 10 yard gaps from there down. But I just don't think it will happen. Today I was averaging below 150 yards with only a couple reaching 160. The ball flight was higher than it should have been, so it may have been partly my swing (not getting my hands forward I would suspect). At least contact was consistently clean. This just gives me a bit more incentive to keep working on the changes I need to put in place.

Those are pretty impressive distances with your 5i. In current conditions, I only hit mine about 165 yards or so. I don't really use it all that much except on the shorter par 3, but you could use it off the tee in the summers. :-)

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.