Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

GOP lists wasteful items in Stimulus Bill


Note: This thread is 6323 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
hope the entire bill is copied & pasted into that link. it's all a waste.

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I agree there, but these are some of the highlights.
My Equipment:
Northwestern 3-, 5-, 7- and 9-wood;
Goldwin AVDP Irons (5-10 plus PW);
U.S. Golf 60 degree wedge;
See-More Putter; Bushnell Yardage Pro 1000 Rangefinder;Golflogix GPS.

Posted
hope the entire bill is copied & pasted into that link. it's all a waste.

Oops, except for one thing. If they're going to provide vouchers for rounds of golf, I'm all in!

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yes, we need all of this. NOT!

Thanks for posting it. It's too bad they weren't concerned with this sort of thing the last eight years.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
word, SDig.

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Don't worry all of you Americans in the chattery class....you don't care....


Change you can believe in....


Posted
Don't worry all of you Americans in the chattery class....you don't care....

I'll see your Schumer and raise a Kerry:

I've spent most of my life golfing - the rest I've just wasted.

In my bag todayâ¦.
Driver: 2009 S9-1 10.5
19d Hybrid4-SW:2008 FP 58/10 Mizuno MP T-10Putter: White Hot XG Sabertooth

Posted

Another broken promise....

Congress received the bill (1100 pages) at 11 last night and was passed early this afternoon. Why? Because Nancy Pelosi has to go to Europe? And I am sure there are >550 pages worth of other reasons...

It's estimated that it would have taken one reading (and comprehending) this bill at 640+ words per minute to have it read in time to vote on it. And that's without a piss break. So that means no coffee....
I wonder if the MicroMachine guy could have done this....?

Posted
Congress received the bill (1100 pages) at 11 last night and was passed early this afternoon. Why? Because Nancy Pelosi has to go to Europe? And I am sure there are >550 pages worth of other reasons...

While I don't doubt that Nancy Pelosi is trying to pull one over, reading a bill isn't like reading

War and Peace , where you have to read chapter 1 to understand chapter 2. Congressmen have assistants and can easily partition the bill into pieces, assign the reading, and get a summary. Plus, most people that are going to vote for it already know most of what is in it and won't be persuaded by arguments about what pork is in there. Furthermore, most that aren't going to vote for it aren't going to be persuaded to vote for it anyway. I still wonder where the fiscally responsible Republicans were hiding for the past eight years.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
While I don't doubt that Nancy Pelosi is trying to pull one over, reading a bill isn't like reading

No. Instead you have to reference Article 23, Article 32 & Article 4 to get through Article 17. I'd think that reading

War and Peace would be easier. Besides, the House voted unanimously to recommend that lawmakers and the public have at least 48 hours to read the legislation before a vote. This obviously did not happen. Why?
Plus, most people that are going to vote for it already know most of what is in it and won't be persuaded by arguments about what pork is in there. Furthermore, most that aren't going to vote for it aren't going to be persuaded to vote for it anyway.

While I agree, that doesn't mean that the time alotted shouldn't have been there. That's like saying it isn't worth teaching a kid to make his/her bed because he/she is just going to make it messy again.

"A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead than an ignorant one." ~Benjamin Franklin
I still wonder where the fiscally responsible Republicans were hiding for the past eight years.

Too busy being moderate so they can pull votes. Also, many of them buying into the idea that government has a place controlling the market. This needs to change....

The words of the founding fathers of this country are no longer being considered: "A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." ~Thomas Jefferson "Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people." ~Thomas Jefferson "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." ~Thomas Jefferson "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." ~Benjamin Franklin

Posted
Besides, the House voted unanimously to recommend that lawmakers and the public have at least 48 hours to read the legislation before a vote. This obviously did not happen. Why?

I'm starting to suspect there's a reason unrelated to the Stimulus bill. This way, the next time the Democrats lose power and the Republicans (with Democratic support) try to push through legislation in a hurry, they can point to this outrage. And it won't work any better than pointing to the Democrats' outrage at things like the Patriot Act's hurried passage is working now.

Too busy being moderate so they can pull votes. Also, many of them buying into the idea that government has a place controlling the market. This needs to change....

Glad to see it worked so well for them. They went from controlling three branches of government to losing two.

The words of the founding fathers of this country are no longer being considered:

Nor have they been, by most lawmakers, in your lifetime. This isn't some sudden new development. I hope you weren't meaning to imply with the quotes that Obama is the first president - or even the first in a row - that believes in big government taking care of people?

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm starting to suspect there's a reason unrelated to the Stimulus bill. This way, the next time the Democrats lose power and the Republicans (with Democratic support) try to push through legislation in a hurry, they can point to this outrage. And it won't work any better than pointing to the Democrats' outrage at things like the Patriot Act's hurried passage is working now.

Good point. Still wrong but I suppose that is way beside the point considering the topic...

Glad to see it worked so well for them. They went from controlling three branches of government to losing two.

Yup

Nor have they been, by most lawmakers, in your lifetime. This isn't some sudden new development. I hope you weren't meaning to imply with the quotes that Obama is the first president - or even the first in a row - that believes in big government taking care of people?

I'm aware of this and have not implied anything toward Obama. Those principles (the ones that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were penned upon) have been lost for quite some time. These things that we are seeing now have been evolving for a while.

Barack Obama is our President....and I hope that he and the rest of the government can and will make this country better and stronger. However, I have never been one to accept change for change.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,

The system as a whole, when it was set up, was not intended to work or to be in place as long as it has. It has been in place for a long time with a tweek here and a tweek there. I don't subscribe to the belief that change is always good. Change is good when it is well thought out, logical and in the end works. While this stimulus bill may work in the end, I don't believe that it has been well thought out and... to me... does not have much logic behind much of it.


Posted
The system as a whole, when it was set up, was not intended to work or to be in place as long as it has. It has been in place for a long time with a tweek here and a tweek there. I don't subscribe to the belief that change is always good. Change is good when it is well thought out, logical and in the end works.

I agree, to a point. I truly believe that the ills that we are experiencing today is because we've veered so far off path. I've experienced a lot of feelings over the past few years and I feel like going back (pre-New Deal) is better than going forward. Government was NEVER intended to get this big, intrusive and powerful. In this respect, Ron Paul has it very, very right.

While this stimulus bill may work in the end, I don't believe that it has been well thought out and... to me... does not have much logic behind much of it.

Ya think?

Ill-conceived, bloated, pork-barreled piece of garbage with very little to stimulate the economy in the long-term. I hope it works, but spending didn't save Japan in the lost decade and the New Deal didn't get us out of the depression. World War II did.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6323 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 37, June 10.  Today was primarily WFH, so I had several practice sessions (indoors, off a mat, into the net).  At least one each of U, 9, and 6-iron full swings with the usual priority.   I also tried a few times a putting type stroke with my 4H, as something I should probably learn how to hit (and what it does), but the mechanical shot at home off a mat doesn't tell me much of what it's doing.  That's something I should probably try on a real green, not during a round until I've tried it.
    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.