Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


sungho_kr

Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1629
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      817


Recommended Posts

I think Tiger is better, Jack's short game has never been as good as Tiger's, that being said I didn't see Jack in his prime so really I'm comparing apples to oranges.

In my Walter Hagen T3 stand bag

Driver- Walter Hagen T3 10.5   3-Wood- Walter Hagen T3   Hybrids- Walter Hagen T3 3i-5i   Irons- Walter Hagen T3 6-PW   Wedge- Walter Hagen T3 56*  Putter- Walter Hagen T3   Ball-   RAW Distance Straight

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Please explain how this makes him a better golfer than Jack.

The first sentence was my answer. The second was reasons why. I was merely pointing out that he may have an advantage over Jack, not that the technology makes him better. I was just joining in on a

subjective discussion. The poster who said we need to wait till Tiger's career is over is correct; I'm willing to bet when the jury comes back it will be Tiger who reigns supreme.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The first sentence was my answer. The second was reasons why. I was merely pointing out that he may have an advantage over Jack, not that the technology makes him better. I was just joining in on a

A reason is a part of an explanation. I agree that we have to wait on Tiger, I stated earlier that at this point in their careers Tiger has done a little bit more, and he's got plenty of time left. But the equipment bit is irrelevant, it gives Tiger no kind of advantage-his competition has access to the very same equipment. Just as Jack's competition did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Speaking of equipment, in their prime, they're both famous for playing an inferior ball (Nike and Tourney - or at least that's the rumour) so relative to the pack, they're even awesomer.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That is like apples to oranges, how can you compare the two guys. Look at the golf equipment used in Jack days compared to today’s high quality equipment, not even close!!!! Put today’s high quality Clubs/Drivers in Jacks hands when he was playing prime golf and see what the outcome would of been, I believe Jack would of broke all the records in the book. Now let Tiger play in real time with Jacks clubs from that era and I am sure we would see a whole different Tiger. No comparison at all……only my opinion

Sticks-In-The-Bag

R9 Driver 9.5
R9 3 & 5 Fairway
Rescues 3 & 4 Hybrids Burner 4-PW Irons Tp 52, 56, 60 Wedges Rossa Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your comment about equipment is so wrong. Jack's equipment were inferior but so were those of his opponents.

Many people long for the good old days. They would argue Jack or Arnold were better than Tiger and Phil and that Magic Johnson, Larry Bird are superior to Lebron and Kobe. Usually, the longing for the 'good old day' involve sports that performance can't be measured objectively. For all the sports that can be timed or measured, current athletes are much better. You don't hear people arguing that past long jumpers, runners, swimmers are better than current ones. The reason is that current jumpers, runners, and swimmers are clearly much better and have the numbers to prove it. You don't hear people arguing the Jesse Owens was better than Usain Bolt. And I would argue that current golfers are better too. The reason that current atheletes are better is because of better training and more competition. Scientific based trainings, In every sports, the use of technologies and scientific studies in training have improved performance. More competition, During Jack and Arnold time, how many people in the world played golf? 10 to 20 million? The current number of golfers in the world is probably about 60 million. So Jack had to be better than 15 million golfers, but Tiger has to be better than 60 million golfers. Statistically speaking, it is much tougher.
That is like apples to oranges, how can you compare the two guys. Look at the golf equipment used in Jack days compared to today’s high quality equipment, not even close!!!! Put today’s high quality Clubs/Drivers in Jacks hands when he was playing prime golf and see what the outcome would of been, I believe Jack would of broke all the records in the book. Now let Tiger play in real time with Jacks clubs from that era and I am sure we would see a whole different Tiger. No comparison at all……only my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That is like apples to oranges, how can you compare the two guys. Look at the golf equipment used in Jack days compared to today’s high quality equipment, not even close!!!! Put today’s high quality Clubs/Drivers in Jacks hands when he was playing prime golf and see what the outcome would of been, I believe Jack would of broke all the records in the book. Now let Tiger play in real time with Jacks clubs from that era and I am sure we would see a whole different Tiger. No comparison at all……only my opinion

This is nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I wasn't around for Jack's prime, but I think that Tiger is the better golfer. If he can get his act together and win some more majors there certainly shouldn't be any doubt that Tiger is indeed a better golfer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your comment about equipment is so wrong. Jack's equipment were inferior but so were those of his opponents.

Some much needed common sense in this thread. Great post.

I root for Jack to keep the record, but acknowledge what Tiger has accomplished, which is a dominance through his mid-30's that no one has matched.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


More competition,

khale, you bring up some good arguments, but you might want to rethink this one. All Jack and Tiger had/have to do is beat the golfers who are capable of beating them. Even if your numbers are correct about the total number of people playing golf then and now, only maybe 100 are capable of beating either one in their time, and only 20-30 were/are serious threats.

Now maybe we can quibble a bit over my estimates, but in Jack's day I ranked 18,469,734 in the world, and I currently rank 6,390,527. I don't think I ever made it tougher for anyone who plays golf professionally.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • My two cents? Don't. As a beginner that's interested in learning about the golf swing, you'll find yourself consuming a lot of information, most of which isn't even relevant to your own swing. You need to learn you can't think your way to a good golf swing. Focus on the one thing that you're working on and doing that on every swing, come what may. And remember, mishits happen.
    • Day 6 (7 May 24) - More work in the backyard focused on tempo in addition to setup.  Worked with 6 and 7 irons hitting hard foam balls - used the old MacGregor irons to mix it up a little.   
    • No! lol. But they have to be in the right sequence to play mid-handicap golf or little better. Mostly. And even in that there is range/margin for error in the motions and positions that most normal humans can handle. It helps if you have a decent idea of how a golf club moves around the body like you would any other equipment sports (baseball and hockey might be the closest) After all, fairways are 40 yards wide. Don't overthink it. Be diligent in getting basics right. I will concede that it is harder than it sounds but it certainly is not exact angle/exact position/exact degree of bend/exact speed/exact facial expression, etc, every.... single.... time or the result is horrible death. 
    • Looking to play in the Severna Park Golf league and it got rained out the first three weeks. I know the course is being renovated so it is not in great shape but the location is easy for me and I would love to meet some other golfers in my area. Anyone here in Maryland Annapolis area? 
    • I like to look at the positives.  Overall you are fairly consistent down the center with most shots 20 yards or less off center.  On most fairways that should be in play.  Sure, you had some very short duds, but also if you look there is a good cluster in the 110-125 yard range.  Sure, we would all like to be longer, but knowing your typical shot is more important than trying to hit the 7-Iron 175 Yards.  Just take more club for longer shots and do not worry about it.  Your distances may increase as you improve over time so do not get caught up on that now.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...