Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1628
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Tiger hands down best ever! just my opinion.

MB 710 Iron Set 5-PW Blades Steel Shafts,
Vokey Design Spin Milled Wedges 52,56,60
hybore 2iH, 3iH, 5W, Driver XL, Putter
Balls "Pro V1's", " Callaway Warbirds"
Career Low Round: 79


I think Tiger has done great things for the game in the public eye and has helped bring Nike bring better equipment to the Amateurs. In terms of play style i'm too young to know how Jack played :)
In my M9 Cart Bag:
Driver: MD Superstrong Ti460
Hybrid: Burner Superfast Rescue 3H/18*
Irons: Burner 09 4-SW (inc AW)
Putter: Spider Monza Balero

Jack was a better golfer, but didn't have the science we now have (equipment, nutrition, mechanics, etc).
Tiger is a better athlete and has all the above mentioned advances.

Jack. Even though the courses are longer now adays, Jack probably didn't use the protein shakes, platelet replacement or personal trainers that Tiger uses. (Lou Brock said last year 'if steroids were available in my day, I may have used them'.) Tiger also has some of the best equipment designed for his fit. He does have the natural skill, but he also has a lot of help that Jack never had.

why do you keep bringing up equipment?

Jack played on courses that were set up shorter than today and the greens were slower as well. The people he played against were using the same equipment as him.
Tiger plays on monster 7000+ yard courses, sure he has better equipment but he plays on longer courses with faster greens.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


why do you keep bringing up equipment?

Ding ding ding! The equipment argument is absolutely irrelevant. As long as your competition is playing the same equipment it's not an advantage. At this point I'll say that Tiger Woods has had the better career through age 35, but we still need to see what happens over the next 10-11 years. Personally, I

like Jack better, but that's also irrelevant, though i wouldn't be unhappy if Tiger finishes out at 17 major victories.

Tiger is a better athlete and has all the above mentioned advances.

Not so sure about that one. Nicklaus was an all-around athlete, playing football and basketball in high school and highly regarded in each sport. He also played a mean game of tennis. Is there any evidence of Tiger playing any other sport beside golf, and being good at it?

There is a bit of relevance to the equipment issue in Jack's favor. According to Frank Thomas, the MacGregor ball Jack played was noticeably inferior to other brands available in his day, and alone might have cost Jack a few majors. That wouldn't happen to a premier player today.

Tiger may win more majors than Jack when its all said and down but I think you have to factor in all of Jacks seconds in majors. Tiger has won a lot of majors but it has been win or not that close so far. Maybe that will change.

Driver G10 10.5*
3 Wood G10 15.5*
5 Wood G5
Hybrid G10 21*
Irons 4-P G10Wedges Tour W 54* & 58*Putter G2 CrazeBag Hoofer LiteBall ProV1X


The statistics with Jack finishing second, third, fourth, fifth and top 10 in majors are staggering.

But write off Woods at your peril. Looking back at his majors career it is amazing how he has went on runs circa 2000/2006 winning major after major. He just needs one more Tiger year to be on the very of accomplising his career destiny.

As for Woods being the greater athlete again it is relevant. As indicated it looks like Nicklaus might have been one of the most athletic of his generation too. I must admit I find the notion that either Nicklaus was better because his equipment was worse or Woods was better because he has the best of the best ill thought out.

bad equipment helps the better player. I remember reading quotes about how many people thought the run of dominant golfers was over in the Mid 90's because of equipment changes brought people into the fray that were never there before.

It's hard to say with all of the equipment advantages Tiger has, but I'll give the edge to Tiger. Jack was probably more consistent, and the jury's still out on how Tiger will end up after the fiasco in his personal life, but I think he'll eventually beat Jack's record. I'd certainly rather have a beer with Jack, though.

Here is an interesting read that compares the two by year in their career. Pretty much just breaks up their careers and compares the pieces rather than just their career as a whole. http://dontcostnothing.wordpress.com...xtensive-look/ . In my personal opinion, Nicklaus had a great career, and there's no question his legacy and records focus Woods and keep him motivated...along with the constant media comparisons... But as good as Nicklaus was, Tiger is simply better. In modern day golf with the difficult course set ups and the constant advances in technology it is hard for the most talented golfer to separate himself and pre-sex scandal Tiger did that and I fully believe he will continue to do that.

I have to go with Jack as my personal choice but Tiger is prob the best.

In My Bag:

Driver:
Hybrid:
Irons: Putter:


JACK !
He had no fitness instructor, no big money Nike backing, no advanced equipment like today, no computer generated swing tools, no 'special' Canadian doctors yet he's still won more majors.
and has more second place finishes as well.

i gotta say i think their both pretty even but if tiger can get out of this slump hes in i think he can pull it off

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
    • I've got my pain mostly under control and the meds are working.   I'd like to join. 
    • I would definitely attend if my calendar allows.
    • Finland: I've played Mid-Night Golf in Finland. Really cool. I looked at the schedule for my week out there and I saw that we were teeing off at 9PM... Feels weird, 9 PM tee time. But it was really great. We finished well after 1AM and sat around and drank on the golf course terrace. It was cool. It's really easy to loose track of time when the sun doesn't set.  Here's a picture of me in Finland hitting my approach on the final hole. It's roughly 1:30AM in this photo.  Egypt: Another cool experience was playing golf in Egypt. The entire course is sand. The greens are called browns, cuz they are just sand with oil poured on them and pounded down a bit. Your ball gets kind of oily when you putt, but the caddy cleans it for you after each hole. You carry around a little piece of fake grass (maybe 2 foot square) and place your ball on it each time before you hit. That is except when you go into a sandtrap. The sandtraps are just areas marked off where you don't get to use your little piece of astro-turf. Sometimes they are dug down a bit to make a bunker, sometimes not.  Spain: No special events or anything, but I played a bunch of golf in Spain in the mid-1990's. At that time Spain's economy wasn't doing the best and Europe hadn't quite switched to the Euro. So Spain was using the Peseta. The country of Spain has some incredibly breathtaking courses. (incredible scenery in general) But because of the conversion from the dollar to the Peseta (If memory serves it was 150 to 1), I got to play them for what I remember as being incredibly inexpensive prices. Gorgeous country and really nice people.  Holland or The Netherlands: I lived for a couple of years in what's called The Flevoland in Holland. It's one of the Dutch provinces and it's all land that was recovered from the sea. So, it's all under sea-level. One of the courses I played a few times out there had flags on every hole to show just how deep the water would be if it wasn't for the dams. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...