Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1628
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      819


Recommended Posts

I agree completley.

the greens and courses are completely different nowadays for the most part (greens especially, youd putt balls off the green with that pop stroke)

the greens and courses are completely different nowadays for the most part (greens especially, youd putt balls off the green with that pop stroke)

I'd still say even on nearly impossible courses like Oakmont, w/the new technology, Jack would cream Tiger.

In My Bag :

Driver : HiBore XL
3 Wood : Launcher Gold
Hybrid : 3i Halo 22*Irons : CG4 4-PWWedges : 588 DSG RTG 52* CG11 56* / 60*Putter : GM Exchange2 #4Ball : Z-URS


the greens and courses are completely different nowadays for the most part (greens especially, youd putt balls off the green with that pop stroke)

Jack's "Pop" stroke sure worked pretty good in 1986 at Augusta and I'll bet you a Million Dollars the stimp meter rating wasn't far off from what it was this year in 2007! Smokey the Bear: Think,,,Before You Post!!!

In My Bag:
Driver: :Cobra Amp Cell Pro 9.5*, Stock X-Flex

3 Wood: :Cobra Bio Cell 16*, Stock X-Flex

5 Wood: Cobra Bio Cell 20*, Stock S-Flex
Irons: Bridgestone J40-CB 3-PW, Project-X 6.0

Gap Wedge::Vokey: 52* CNC  

Sand Wedge: :Vokey: 58* CNC  

Putters: Scotty Cameron Newport II 

Ball: Bridgestone 330-S(2014)


I think Tiger has done a great job in terms of attracting more younger people to the sport and also opening it up to a wider audience. Golf wise i dont think you can really say which was actually the better golfer or not.

I'd have to say Jack at this point becasue he ran the full gauntlet of a career and has the win record to back "the greatest" status. Now, Tiger certainly appears to have the ability to pass Jack on the win board. But only time will tell that. It's kinda like Babe Ruth vs. Hank Aaron vs. Barry Bonds.......different times and different technologies will always lead to debate. To me the only way to not debate is to go with the "greatest of his time". But, as I sit here on June the 20th 2007 I gotta go with Jack because he "been there, done that". Tiger's still in the middle of his career and alot can happen over the next several years.

I've got to go with Tiger...he's athletic, focused and an incredible competitor. Jack is "The Man" if you look at the old days when golfer's putted with a smoke in their mouths.

the greens and courses are completely different nowadays for the most part (greens especially, youd putt balls off the green with that pop stroke)

Wasn't that pop stroke ridiculous! Funny stuff! Tiger in a landslide.

I'm still a little young to have seen alot of Jack playing, althought I know all about his records I think that when Tiger is finished he will be the best.

Having seen Jack in his prime I recall his mental toughness much like Tiger's.

It's a tough pick.

I think that history will have to play out more until its can be decided but there's always that possibility that this topic will be debated for a long time after Tiger's career is over.

Fun fact: Nicklaus finished 6th at the Masters in 1998 at age 58.

Tiger: Not for his Golfing ability (which still is unreal) but for his actions towards the game of golf; making it exciting, getting younger people to play, his morals, and helping stop racism in golf

I'd have to agree, I think of Tiger Woods more as Tiger the "idea" than the person. While I'm an admitted newbie who doesn't know much about the games history...I can say that from my perspective Tiger has done more for the game of golf than any other player in popculture. I think what's important here is that we look at how the general public views golf and not just the niche of super-fanatics we have here. Tiger turned golf (from a general-public members perspective) from a borring slow paced game that was used as filler on cable TV on weekends to a prime-time, fast paced sport that is accessible to all people regardless of social background. Golf is now a primtime sport, it's on the TV at the ESPN zone. I'll put it to you this way, ask a non-basketball fan who Michael Jordan is....good chance they will know. Ask a non golf-fan who Jack is....you'll probably get a puzzled look, now ask them who Tiger Woods is...exactly.

-AJ

I like them both very much. With a 5-year-old just beginning to learn about golf, it's all about Tiger Woods around our house right now.

I prefer Tiger, simply because I've been exposed to him so much more. Both these guys are game-changing fellows, they really transcend the game of golf and are amazing in their own ways.
WITB

Callaway FT-5 11°
Callaway X-HOT 15°
Sonartec HB-001 19° & 23°Callaway X-22 5-PWTitleist Vokey 200 Series 52°Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 56°Titleist Vokey Special Grind 60°Scotty Cameron Mizuno M-100

Jack... Just b/c he was my dad's favorite. I am actually a big Tiger fan.

"You're not good enough to get mad. Enjoy the round." Arnold Palmer to Jim Leyland.

Driver: Taylormade r5 80 10.5
Irons: Taylormade RAC OS 3-PW True temper reg flex
Hybrid: Nike Rescue 18* graphite stiff flexWedge: Taylormade RAC 56* satinWedge: Cleveland Tour Action 60*Putter: Odyssey White...


I'm going to have to go with Jack. But I think in time it will be Tiger. Just give him a few more years.

Hi-Bore XLS Tour Driver
Steelhead III: 3 Wood
Bobby Jones Jesse Ortiz Hybrid
i3+: 3-9 Irons
Vokey Black Nickel: PW, 52, 56, 60 Bettinardi A-02 Putter NXT Tour


I'm like many others here who haven't had the privilege to witness Jack in his prime time. I also agree that it is too early to tell who is actually best since Tiger is still many years out of retirement, so I'm neutral at the moment.

However, i must say, the reason why I started playing golf (and am now thoroughly diagnosed as an addict) is because of Tiger Woods's seemingly stupid little video game for the Playstation2. If it weren't for my friends and I playing that game religiously, i probably wouldn't have started playing real golf for another few years at least.

Very much in the same way i wouldn't have started taking my sports car to enthusiastically drive on various road racing tracks if the Gran Turismo racing series for PS2 never entered my life. See, video games can be positive thing!!!

Thank you Tiger Woods, Electronic Arts, and Sony for helping me pick probably the 2 most expensive hobbies that exist!!!

R7 Superquad 10.5* REAX regular flex shaft
FT 5 wood
675XC forged irons 3-PW, True Temper DG SL stiff(S300) shafts
55* BeCu sandwedge
e6+ balls or ProV1
Cougar X-cat putter (odyssey 2-ball rip-off)

Considering Tiger's knee issues and the fact that his swing relies so heavily on athleticism, will he still be around at 50+? I wonder....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Question for the group. The course I normally play at has 27 holes - 3 9s that they use to for 18 in the various combinations. Is it okay to declare* if I’m playing front or back when I play 9 on this course? I’m figuring I need to declare before I play a shot. *meaning just say to myself that this is the back 9. Curious what people think. Of course, my only holes left are 13 and 17, so I’m going to declare the back 9 for the rest of the year. Probably only one or two more rounds though. 
    • This is my opinion as well. I would love to see the LPGA take the lead on this.    This.
    • I agree in general. The one way in which the viewer will notice the pace of play is just that "it's been an hour and Nelly Korda or Scottie Scheffler have only played four holes." Or if for some reason they show a lot of shots of players just standing around when they could be showing golf shots. But I think Andy Johnson said it most recently/best, playing fast is a skill, too. I would love for pro golfers to play faster. You'd see the players you want to see hit more shots in the same time than they do now. So I don't disagree with the pace of play stuff, and hope they can find ways to do it. Heck, the LPGA should leap at the chance to differentiate itself in this way, IMO. So: I stand by what I said in that the TV viewer really doesn't notice much about pace of play. It's rare when they do. I support increasing the pace of play wholeheartedly. But my top five reasons don't include TV ratings or viewership.
    • I don't think the viewer at home can pick up on pace of play, unless the announcers mention something. The telecast has the luxury of bouncing from player to player, which ensures we the viewer always have something to watch.  I think we would notice pace of play if the camera just followed one golfer for an entire round. Or  You were actually golfing behind the slow group Or  The slow group is the last to only group left to finish the tournament.  I like the idea of having a person carrying a digital clock, following each golfer. When the golfer gets to the ball and the group in front of them has cleared they have 60 seconds or they get a penalty stroke. Maybe a second violation is a 2 stroke penalty.  Or as I have said before, every golfer wears a shock collar!!!!! at 1 min 1 second that golfer if going to drop. It will take them a good 30 second to recover, leaving them with another 30 seconds to hit the shot. The course would be littered with golfers just convulsing on fair way from an endless cycle of shocks because they cant seem to hit their ball and keep pace of play. 
    • This isn't the same thing.  This is entirely a time of year thing. Not a trend.  This is the COVID year.  There are many who think the Masters viewership was actually way up. The 2024 ratings being down is only for CBS televisions. It doesn't include anyone (including me) who watched it online. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...