Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Have you been professionally fitted?


Note: This thread is 5741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Have you ever been professionally fittted?

    • Yes
      70
    • No
      91


Recommended Posts

Posted
Shin,

The technology developed is fantastic. It's just a matter of using it properly. I'm still a big fan of dynamic fitting, and I will likely go for one at some point in the future, although not this location.

As for the Aerotech, I've read that it's actually a combo shaft. Meaning, that they have a graphite core and steel fiber that covers the entire shaft. This is one shaft that comes highly praised from the folks at Scratch Golf. (They make sweet wedges BTW)

AeroTech are probably great shafts. Of course, the ones I had were the wrong length, and that was probably the biggest factor in my improved ball striking when I switched back.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The funny thing to me is that every instructor and pga pro i have ever talked to stressed the importance of mid to high handicappers having properly fitted clubs over low handicappers....
They basically all said that a good/great golfer can with some minor adjustments hit any club any size, but a mid/hig handicapper will be more consistant alot quicker when they have clubs in there hands that help produce a easy natural swing and clubs that fit that swing.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
People like me on the extreme edge of the scales can really benefit from fitting. Problem is there's no easy way to know if you are someone like me. Even fitting pros are surprised at my results, but the results have been consistent each of the 4 times I've been through it. Not typical, but consistent. There is also no question it makes a tremendous difference.

The way PING does it, I don't know why everyone wouldn't go to a demo day. Nothing to lose and everything to gain. Not only that it's the only way I'll ever see my launch angle and spin rates on an $80,000.00 doppler radar launch monitor. The PING fitters have always been professional and no pressure to buy, so why not?

Posted
The way PING does it, I don't know why everyone wouldn't go to a demo day. Nothing to lose and everything to gain. Not only that it's the only way I'll ever see my launch angle and spin rates on an $80,000.00 doppler radar launch monitor. The PING fitters have always been professional and no pressure to buy, so why not?

I've read that Ping offers two different types of fittings. Both are dynamic but one is even more intricate. This is where they digitally measure the lofts of the driver, woods, hybrids and putters. They come up with lofts like 10.6 and such. They also measure specifically for the irons in a similar fashion. Is this what you experienced?

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
Having been through the Ping process 4 times over 10 years, the process has changed as technology has changed. Only recently have they integrated the launch monitor, and at $80K a pop, I'm sure they only have a few in the field making the rounds. I have no doubt that Ping has the ability to measure clubs loft and lie electronically, but not sure if they do that in the field. When they fit you, they have you hitting their clubs, clubs they already know the specs for. They may have you hit your existing clubs to observe flight characteristics and measure launch angle and spin rates (performance characteristics), but that's to establish a basis for comparison I think. After all, it matters less what a club actually measures statically than how it performs dynamically. I believe it is quite possible, for instance, to have clubs from different manufacturers with identical static specs that perform very differently. I really enjoyed having access to that launch monitor. I was able to see the actual moment of impact on a laptop much like watching the high-def slow-mo Swingvision stuff you see on TV. No Peter Kostis available for commentary, though, which was probably a good thing in my case.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I had an amazing 4.5 hour fitting in the Taylormade Performance Lab, including time on the range; the pro / master fitter was fantastic. In addition to data, it's great to have a dvd with 24 swings captured (pw, 6i, driver, putter) and spotted some things to improve upon.

Can't wait until my new sticks arrive.


Posted
Golf Headquarters, I would call it semi-pro but I think he did what he was supposed to do. I ended up with 2* up on my clubs and he concurred that there was no real advantage to graphite on my 7-A irons, so that made them cheaper. When they came in I had them retape every club so I could see that the 2* was right and every club struck dead center on the sole.

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka


Posted
In recent years, there has been a tremendous rise in the demand for custom-fit clubs. To meet this demand, OEM manufacturers began marketing custom-fit clubs as one of their areas of expertise. But, the reality is that with a little smoke and mirrors routine, they deliver nothing more than another production line set of clubs. By merely using clubhead speed as the key to fitting clubs, they do not need personal contact, nor do they need to deviate from the standard frequency slope or their production procedures. The majority of the OEM manufacturers continue to push clubhead design as the answer to our performance problems, and they change them each and every year and tell us they will improve our games even more than last year's model. More than likely, last year's model did absolutely nothing for your game either, unless you just happened upon the correct shaft frequency for your swing.

The publication "Golf Shop Operations" reported last year that 33 golf club companies offered some sort of formal clubfitting process. More recently, "Golf Digest's" online poll disclosed that nearly 90% of those surveyed believed that they would benefit from custom-fit clubs, but only 33% of those same respondents had ever been fitted. Do yourselves a favor and get your clubs professionally fit.
Driver - Kenneth Smith 460 Classic Grafalloy Blue
Woods - Kenneth Smith 3 & 5 Woods Grafalloy Blue
Irons - Kansas City KC-102 Musclebacks Harrison Professional Shafts
Wedges - Kansas City 56* & 60* KCM-Grinds Harrison Professional Shafts
Putter - Kansas City Prototype

Posted
I did a quick search and found a few threads about getting fitted, but I am curious to know who here has actually been fitted and did you notice an immediate impact?

Yes and Yes.

909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
I am between 5'-7" & 5'8" and all of my hybrids/woods "feel" long for me. I also tend to lean over the ball a bit more than most (think Paula Creamer w/o the body and cute face :))

I understand most clubs are for someone around 5'10" which is not planets away from my size however a 5'10" man is noticibly bigger than I both in arm length and overall height.

With all of this said have any of you of shorter stature found that they needed shorter clubs?

I would like to get fitted however the only places I know in my area (St. Louis) are the chain stores.

Posted
Nonsense. I'm not sure why you're trying to downplay the importance of fitting, but you're

He's not talking crap as you so nicely put it. What's the point of being fit for a swing that's going to evolve as you get better? The point is the OEMs etc can sting you for a new set/fitting session (probably many times over) sometime in the future.

If you are Joe average who can pick up a standard set and it fits, then it's all well and good. But what about if the player really needs a different lie angle - a couple of deg up or flat, you think using standard lie angles is really going to help them improve?

Most of us will find a "standard" set fine.

To all the folks wondering about fitting.

Waste of money IMHO. Just another way to make people think they haven't actually got to work at developing a good swing/game themselves; I mean why would they? They can buy a game these days right? New driver, new putter, fitting...all the latest whizz-bang technology every season. Nice work for the OEMs if they can get it.

In recent years, there has been a tremendous rise in the demand for custom-fit clubs. To meet this demand, OEM manufacturers began marketing custom-fit clubs as one of their areas of expertise. But, the reality is that with a little smoke and mirrors routine, they deliver nothing more than another production line set of clubs. By merely using clubhead speed as the key to fitting clubs, they do not need personal contact, nor do they need to deviate from the standard frequency slope or their production procedures. The majority of the OEM manufacturers continue to push clubhead design as the answer to our performance problems, and they change them each and every year and tell us they will improve our games even more than last year's model.

Precisely. In a nutshell. Hit the nail on the head. It's another way to part us from our money.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I voted no, but that is not entirely correct. I have been fitted, but I did not agree with him on any of his recomendations. He was basing his recomendations on swing speed, spin rate launch angle only. My driver swing speed averaged around 105 with my spin rate being in the low 3000's and my lunch angle was 10 degrees. He told me I need a light weight, stiff shafted driver with about 10.5 degrees of loft because I "need" to hit the ball higher with less spin to get more carry, which will increase overall distance. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! When I told him I load and release the club different than most people so a light weight, regular stiff flex driver will not work, he looked at me like I just shot him in the back.

So, he brings out this driver he already has made up and tells me it is what I should be hitting to gain accuracy and distance. I hit it and the numbers were better.. almost perfect. But then I started to hit it compared to my driver. He watched as I hit the "perfect" driver 20 yards shorter then my "not perfect" driver. After a while I had to mention that the numbers do lie sometimes. Just because the numbers are perfect does not mean anything when you get out on the course. You have to find one you like and can control.. numbers be damned.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


  • 2 months later...
Posted
Voted "No". Bought my first set of clubs was purchased when I just started playing golf a few months ago. I had played a bit (for a few months) many years ago on my dad's clubs, but I really had no clue what I was doing. There was no point in any fitting beyond simply picking out something I liked.

Played around with a selection of putters and bought the one that felt most comfortable to me, regardless of brand. I tried several different 7-irons and chose the one I felt most comfortable with. Trying the in stock choices, I really liked the heavier swingweight and the feel at impact of the set I have now. Chose the closest I could get to matching wedges. Bought my woods a month later. As with the irons, felt more comfortable with something a bit heavier feeling.

I plan to develop my game with these clubs. I knew that I was buying clubs that aren't intended for a beginning golfer, but I hoped that they would push me to really improve my technique. My instructor has tried my clubs (driver, 7i, SW) and told me that he likes them a lot. Works for me. After I develop a solid and consistent swing, I'll allow myself to get fitted for whatever my dream set might be. But until then, I'll learn on these.

My beloved Pinke Gin:

G15 woods (1, 3, 5, R flex, Nike VR grips)
VR split cavity (3-PW, DG S300)
VR wedges (54-12, 60-6, DG S400) White Hot Tour #1 putter e6 golf balls


Posted
I am going as soon as i can with my clubs, no rush as of now since i live in Michigan and its snowing. I do have a net though to practice and such in the garage so i would rather get it done sooner then later.

I've read a lot of people saying No and their reasons why.
Personally i have to choke down and scoot up to my ball to get my lie on my club to sit flat on ground. im 5'6 and i think my wrist was 32" which means i need a -3 degree lie on my clubs which makes sense.

I have no doubt in my mind that i will see improvements in my clubs especially in my wedge's.

my swing with my clubs unfitted is not comfortable at all.


** I think when you buy clubs off the shelf they are made for the Average person according to height and wrist height. Which would make it ok for a lot of people in the world not to get fitted.


on the other hand even if your clubs head is correct, your shaft flex could be wrong which could cause problems too..

Bag
Sumo 5900 9.5d
Sumo 3 & 5 Woods Pro launch shafts
Victory Red Split cavity 4-pw
Victory Red Wedges 52/10,56/14/60,10 White hot Putter / Balls


Posted
Personally i have to choke down and scoot up to my ball to get my lie on my club to sit flat on ground. im 5'6 and i think my wrist was 32" which means i need a -3 degree lie on my clubs which makes sense.

You won't be disappointed after you have your clubs fitted. I am also 5'6 with a 31" wrist. I had been playing with an old set of stock clubs that my father had and I always had to choke down. At first the fitted clubs felt short for me even though I was used to choking down on my old ones. Now I love them, I have gained distance and control.

I sent my mom to get fitted because she stands only 4'10 and wasn't able to swing a stock set properly. It was after talking to her that I decided to go and get fitted myself. For the price of a middle - upper end set of stock clubs, you can get fitted for about the same price.

Here's what's in my ogio.gif Grom...

wishon.gifDriver: 919 THI 460cc 9°
wishon.gifWoods: 915 F/H 16° and 21°
wishon.gifIrons: 752 TC 5-9, PW, AW, SWtaylormade.gifPutter: Rossa - Suzukatitleist.gifNXT Tour


Posted
Yes, I have been fit and yes it made a difference. I am average height at 5'-10" but my lie angle is 3* flat. With a standard set I do not hit the ball as consistently as with the fitted clubs. I do think a standard set if fine for a beginner, but when you are ready to get serious, get fit.

____________________________________________

nike.gifTour
ping.gifG10 Driver 9*
ping.gifG10 3Wood 15.5*ping.gifG10 5Wood 18.5*ping.gifG10 Irons 4- PWping.gifTour Wedges 50*, 56*, 60*odyssey.gifPutter 33" Sabertoothbridgestone.gifBall E6


  • 3 months later...
Posted
I got fit after working with my pro to get a consistent swing. No either/or about it. You need to work with a pro to get your swing in shape, and when it is, you should get fitted too. What people are describing as ball speed and spin rate only, or static fit only, won't cut it. I would recommend you working with a pro on your swing, and letting that same pro fit you, not just based on height, etc., but based on real results off of a real lie board.

Note: This thread is 5741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.