Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Hole-in-one or double eagle?


Note: This thread is 5897 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Double eagle, I have one hole-in-one, I have an eagle on a par 5 and a par 4 (both in the same round in a 3 hole stretch).

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


  • Moderator
Posted
Double eagle. I have also had a hole in one and a double eagle are harder to come by!

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ill take a double eagle over a hole and one any time.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
I have always wanted a hole in one so I would take that over a double eagle even though I know it's less under par. The closest I have been is two ball lengths away.

:cobra: Amp Driver 10.5*(R)
:tmade: Burner 3W 15*(R)
:tmade: Burner 2.0 Rescue 3-4
:titleist: 714 AP1 Irons 5-pw, gw(Steel XP95 R300)
:callaway: MD3 Wedges 56, 60
:nickent:Omen Long Putter(un-anchored)


Posted
False dilemma.

A guy I work with has done that before! It's on a blind tee shot too and he went for the green and went in. He had no clue it went in for about 10-15 minutes.

On topic though, I would much rather get a double eagle. Like people have stated, you need to make two good shots, and not just one.

In my Ozone:

Driver: S9-1 10.5*
Woods: 2007 Burner 3 Wood 15*
Hybrids 2009 3 Rescue 19*Irons: MX-200 4-PWWedges: 52, CG12 56Putter: White Hot XG 2-Ball Blade 35"


Posted
Having only gone for a par-5 in two three times in my life - and having only hit the green in two once - I can say I'd be very satisfied with a double eagle. Others have pointed out it knocks 3 off your score instead of 2 (relative to par at least), but people have left out another important reason.

I'm cheap, and if I make an ace, I need to buy drinks. I've never heard of the double-eagle man needing to buy drinks.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Let's put it this way, if a non-golfer tries to engage you in conversation, how many of them will ask, "Have you ever made a double eagle?"

About the same number who will ask a horseman if he's ever won the Preakness. As opposed to the Kentucky Derby, the obvious question.

Give me the hole-in-one. I'd trade dozens of double eagles for a single hole in one. On a list of what I'd like to accomplish, that deuce has never entered the mental page.

Not that I've had a double eagle. Disgustingly, my closest misses in both categories were almost identical. In the '80s I hit a 4 wood to the dogleg par 5 #11 hole at Biltmore in Coral Gables, a Donald Ross design. I knew it was good but my friend insisted it was great. We got there and it didn't look possible, an inch and a half directly behind the hole, on a flat section of the green.

More than a decade later the same thing on a course in North Carolina. I hit an 8 iron on a downhill 163 yard par 3. It looked awesome from the outset but a trap fronted the green. I knew it had to be extremely close, and I walked with nervous anticipation to the green.

Again, an inch and a half smack behind the hole. At least this time it was a sensible path to end up there, a draw and the green had some slope in that direction.

Posted
I tried to make this a Poll, but I messed that up...

Me too....much harder to do.

909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
There's no question that a double eagle is harder and I would have a lot personal satisfaction with one but a hole-in-one is widely thought of as the perfect golf hole and I think I'd rather have it on my bragging resume.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'd take either.... have been inches from both.
Many close calls on the ace... hit a few sticks and had a few where I could not understand the relationship between my ballmark, the hole, and my ball and it having not gone in.
The double eagle I have been inches twice... once I was about 8 inches after hitting a 3-hybrid, and once I was about 6 inches just short after hitting a 5-iron.

My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
The albatross (double eagle) is more rare than the hole-in-one, however, I would much rather have a hole-in-one. As good as a '2' would look on a par-5, a '1' on the card would look even better.

In my bag..

Driver: Mighty Big T3, 8°, Grafalloy Prolite 35
Fairway Wood: PT, 13°
Fairway Wood: Seville 15° (in my bag since 1987)Irons: T-Zoid Pro, 3-PWSW: MP-9, 56°LW: Tour Star, 64°Putter: Allied Professional (in my bag since 1989)Ball: ProV1xShoes:


Posted
I have 3 hole in ones and no double eagles, so I would trade two for one.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
Depends on the par three...it'd have to be a really hard one. I've always said I'd rather make the double eagle. I've come closer to making one than I have a hole in one.


 


Posted
double eagle anyday. consists of two good shots, or one great rescue shot. Making a hole in one on a par 3 is like making an eagle on a par 4. I think 3 under would be a tad bit sweeter than two under as well.

Posted
Ill take either or for me!

In my 2010 TMX Staff Bag
r9 SuperTri 9.5 Driver
r9 #3 Fairway Wood
r9 #5 Fairway wood
Burner Plus Irons (3-PW) w/ Graphite shafts 54*/60* Wedge Newport 2 Studio Select Pro V1s


Note: This thread is 5897 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I think part of it is there hasn't been enough conclusive studies specific to golf regarding block studies. Maybe the full swing, you can't study it because it is too complicated and to some degree it will fall into variable or random.  
    • Going one step stiffer in the golf shaft, of the same make and model will have minor impact on the launch conditions. It can matter, it is a way to dial in some launch conditions if you are a few hundred RPM off or the angle isn't there. Same with moving weights around. A clubhead weights 200-220 grams. You are shifting a fraction of that to move the CG slightly. It can matter, again its more about fine tuning. As for grip size, this is more personal preference. Grip size doesn't have any impact on the swing out of personal preference.  You are going to spend hundreds of dollars for fine tuning. Which if you want, go for it. I am not sure what your level of play is, or what your goals in golf are.  In the end, the golf swing matters more than the equipment. If you want to go to that level of detail, go find a good golf club fitter. ChatGPT is going to surface scan reddit, golfwrx, and other popular websites for the answers. Basically, it is all opinionated gibberish at this point.   
    • Wordle 1,640 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Well the first advice I would give is to look at your swing. If you are swing out to in, it may be difficult to fix your misses with club adjustments. They would only be a bandaid. I use midsize grips because I have long fingers and I feel I have more control with them. I also have tinkered with shaft length and swing weight. But I know when I miss it’s because my swing was off.
    • Wordle 1,640 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.