Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1070 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Bananarama

You know this is not true, if he comes from an inside -> outside path with an open face (to the path) he will push it and fade it.

Of course that's true, but he said his natural shot was "a fade or a push-fade." Virtually nobody who describes their natural shot that way is coming from the inside.

And it's unlikely that he's playing a "from inside-out" push-fade. It's more likely he has the BFL wrong and thinks he's swinging inside-out when he's not.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Of course that's true, but he said his natural shot was "a fade or a push-fade." Virtually nobody who describes their natural shot that way is coming from the inside.

And it's unlikely that he's playing a "from inside-out" push-fade. It's more likely he has the BFL wrong and thinks he's swinging inside-out when he's not.

No I've been a regular here long enough that I know exactly what the ball flight laws are.  You're over-interpreting a sloppy sentence from me.  My natural shape, especially with the longer clubs, is a push fade with a very clearly slightly in-to-out divot but with the heel of the left hand really dragging forward through impact leaving the face open even to that in-to-out path and resulting in a push-fade.

When I try to fix it, I've still always had a hard time getting the face closed or even to square relative to the path consistently, so trying to fix it sometimes results in an out-to-in path with face square to the target line giving me just a straight fade.  That's why I say my natural shot is fade or push-fade, but really my base natural shot is the slightly in-to-out, open face push-fade.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by mdl

No I've been a regular here long enough that I know exactly what the ball flight laws are.  You're over-interpreting a sloppy sentence from me.  My natural shape, especially with the longer clubs, is a push fade with a very clearly slightly in-to-out divot but with the heel of the left hand really dragging forward through impact leaving the face open even to that in-to-out path and resulting in a push-fade.

When I try to fix it, I've still always had a hard time getting the face closed or even to square relative to the path consistently, so trying to fix it sometimes results in an out-to-in path with face square to the target line giving me just a straight fade.  That's why I say my natural shot is fade or push-fade, but really my base natural shot is the slightly in-to-out, open face push-fade.

Okay. Just checking. Having those wrong, as you know, can lead to a lot of time spent working on the wrong things.

P.S. You probably also know this, so I'll say it for the benefit of others: divots don't tell the truth, though if anything they tend to point more left than the actual path, so if they point right, it's unlikely the path is actually left.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Okay. Just checking. Having those wrong, as you know, can lead to a lot of time spent working on the wrong things.

P.S. You probably also know this, so I'll say it for the benefit of others: divots don't tell the truth, though if anything they tend to point more left than the actual path, so if they point right, it's unlikely the path is actually left.

That one (about the divots) I didn't know.  Thanks for the tell.  Makes sense given the geometry of the club though that the divot could tend to point a little left of your club path.

Back to the original point, I'm really pumped about the butt slide instead of the hip point slide.  It's far from great yet, and with the butt slide along with deep hands I'm hitting way too many straight huge pushes and big hooks still, but I've also started hitting semi-regular push draws that end up on target for the first time in my golfing career, and it definitely feels like another small step in the right direction.  Hopefully it'll be more than, say, 12 days before everything goes to s**t and I need to start fixing the next thing in order not to start inflating the HC :)

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Apologies if it's already been mentioned in this thread, but the guys at GolfTEC say that from a sample of over 150 tour players they average 42 degrees open with their hips at impact with a 5 iron.  Amateurs (from a sample of 180,000) average 23 degrees open.

Their other findings:

Takeaway:

The pros achieve an average of 55 degree shoulder turn by the time the club reaches parallel to the ground in the takeaway.  Amateurs average only 30 degrees.  Pros therefore complete much of their shoulder turn early in the backswing.

Top of backswing:

Interestingly, they are very similar.  Both turn their shoulders more than 80 degrees and both tilt their shoulders downward about 35 degrees.  More on this later.

Move Down:

This is where they say pros get it so right and amateurs so wrong - pros drop the right shoulder (setting them in place to come from the inside) but amateurs rotate the shoulders (promoting the over the top move).

So, halfway down:  Pros shoulders are tilted nearly 20 degrees more to his right than a slicer's, their shoulder tilts being 5 degrees left and 24 degrees left respectively.  Also, a pro's hips are 10 degrees open and an amateur's are 10 degrees closed.

Impact:

Sholder tilt:  Pro (43 degrees), amateur (only 30 degrees)

Hips: Pro (42 degrees open), amateur (only 23 degrees open).

THE FINAL ANALYSIS:

So, how come despite looking similar at top of backswing, pros get the all-important transition move right and amateurs get it wrong?  They say it's all about how you get to the top of the backswing.  Refer to the takeaway stats.  Because amateurs don't turn in the takeaway, they need to make two-thirds of their shoulder turn in the 2nd half of the backswing.  And, they say, if you turn late you're likely to turn early in the downswing.....and that works against the proper shoulder tilt you need to avoid a slice.

It was all about how the backswing was sequenced .

So, how to turn early in the backswing (and therefore set up the correct sequence to give yourself the best chance of sucess from there)?  Make the buttons on your golf shirt point past your right toe by the time the club is parallel to the ground.


  • Administrator
Posted

Here are some other stats, and they're current and not based on information that's who knows how old:

The average PGA Tour pro has 85-95% of his pressure forward at impact.

The average amateur never gets above 70%, and many that get close to 70% are going backwards at impact (they'll get to 70% too early in the backswing, then straighten the lead knee and push their weight and pressure backwards). Most are around 55% at impact.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

haha, who's that dude in my avatar?

I've just been out to my garden and have been swinging thinking to 'swing real easy and slide hips' (the latter to start the downswing), and i have to say it feels good.


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by GaryH

It was all about how the backswing was sequenced.

So, how to turn early in the backswing (and therefore set up the correct sequence to give yourself the best chance of sucess from there)?  Make the buttons on your golf shirt point past your right toe by the time the club is parallel to the ground.

And to keep turning with a steady head, do this,

http://thesandtrap.com/t/55080/myth-of-maintaining-address-flexion-in-the-rear-knee

Not a topic for this thread but I couldn't help myself

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by mdl

No I've been a regular here long enough that I know exactly what the ball flight laws are.  You're over-interpreting a sloppy sentence from me.  My natural shape, especially with the longer clubs, is a push fade with a very clearly slightly in-to-out divot but with the heel of the left hand really dragging forward through impact leaving the face open even to that in-to-out path and resulting in a push-fade.

When I try to fix it, I've still always had a hard time getting the face closed or even to square relative to the path consistently, so trying to fix it sometimes results in an out-to-in path with face square to the target line giving me just a straight fade.  That's why I say my natural shot is fade or push-fade, but really my base natural shot is the slightly in-to-out, open face push-fade.

So, the only thing I can think of to explain it is that your swing path is inside out in relation to the target line, but, outside-in in relation to your club face.


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Okay. Just checking. Having those wrong, as you know, can lead to a lot of time spent working on the wrong things.

P.S. You probably also know this, so I'll say it for the benefit of others: divots don't tell the truth, though if anything they tend to point more left than the actual path, so if they point right, it's unlikely the path is actually left.

Can't an inside-out swing at contact start to move to an outside-in swing after contact during the divot?


Posted

Very hard, very hard to get.  I'm not a low hcp'r, I'm a 5.6 and today I pulled or pull hooked every single shot, every single shot.  Possibly the most frustrating round in years, but the silver lining is that I know absolutely that I am not sliding my hips properly.  They're turning out and too fast allowing my hands to whip through unimpeded by the body leading the way.  So my hands close the face before the club gets to impact.

How to get this slide incorporated into my swing?  Nothing in this article helps me to do that.  Anyone out there have a better idea?


Posted

Wow thanks for this thread, it is definitely something I need to work on. I have read the entire thread and have been working on sliding my hips for about 2 weeks at the range, I feel I have been making some good progress but was wondering if some of the more knowledgeable folks could comment on my swing?

IMHO it seems to me that I am sliding my hips properly but then I seem to quit rotating or just quit on my swing all together, am I actually sliding correctly? If so any swing thoughts to keep rotating through?

Thanks,


Posted
Originally Posted by mvmac

Not a topic for this thread but I couldn't help myself

Backswing knee action seems relevant to the hip slide, so I say you're fine.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Great thread.  I have read it several times, and have been trying to incorporate a hip slide into the beginning of my downswing.  It has helped a lot!

Occasionally though, while my hips slide forward, my shoulders dip down too much and I chunk it or sky a drive.  What have y'all found (either swing thoughts, drills, mechanics) that help prevent that?  Thanks in advance.


  • Administrator
Posted
Great thread.  I have read it several times, and have been trying to incorporate a hip slide into the beginning of my downswing.  It has helped a lot!  Occasionally though, while my hips slide forward, my shoulders dip down too much and I chunk it or sky a drive.  What have y'all found (either swing thoughts, drills, mechanics) that help prevent that?  Thanks in advance.

Your hips probably aren't going forward as far as you think - your head is probably dipping backwards in those cases.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1070 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.