Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5804 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. 5 or 6 iron?

    • 5 iron
      40
    • 6 iron
      22


Recommended Posts

Posted
If I had to force 6 iron, I will feel pressure and may make mistake. Easy swing with 5 will do it better for me.

Driver: Big Bertha 460, (9° Steel) | Wood: X Fairway 3W (15° Steel) | Hybrid: X 3H (21° Steel) |
Irons: 4-PW, MP-52 (TT DG S300) | Wedges: X-Forged Chrome 52°/13, 56°/15, 60°/10 (TT DG S300) |
Putter: Ping Karsten Anser


Posted
Depends on where I'd want to miss. A 5 yard longer shot is not like swinging the club 120%. Unless the back part of the green is open and won't give me trouble, I'd hit a 6i. Swinging easier sometimes yield better results, so I might risk hitting it 185 yards. If possible, the 6i might land 5 yards short of the green and roll onto it.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
it depends on how the green slopes, hazards, etc. If there are no dangers, I'd play a 6 iron, hoping it would release

In my bag:

Titleist 905 Aldila VS Proto| TaylorMade r9 stiff shaft| Titleist 906F Aldila NV 75-S Fairway| Titleist ZM S300 (3-PW) |Titleist 54º SM TT Wedge Flex| Titleist 60º SM TT Wedge Flex| Scotty Cameron Newport 2

09 Goals- Handicap to 2 (I'm crazy I know)- Win 10 tournaments (dune)- Win...


Posted
Choke down on 5-iron.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would use the 6 and hurry before my skin turns green and rips my clothes.

Titleist 910D2 8.5° Diamana 'ahina 80 S
Titleist 909F3 3W 13° Diamana D83 S, Titleist 910f 5W 19° Fubuki Ax 80X
Taylormade RAC MB TP 3-PW Irons DG S300, Callaway Jaws 54° and 60°
Titleist Futura putter, Taylormade TP5 balls


Posted
Tough one. Swinging easy throws off my timing, knowing I need to put extra on a shot mentally causes problems (makes me dip my left shoulder). I think I'd go easy 5 iron though, choke down on the club and roll it in there.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Thats pretty easy actually. You say the 6 goes 170 and the 5 goes 185. With only those variables like you mentioned, I am assuming that your assuming that you will "nut" both shots.

That said, I'd take the 6 iron all day. The 6 iron will be 5 yards short of the cup, but the 5 iron will be 15 yards long of the cup. I'd take a 15 foot putt over a 45 footer any day of the week!!!

In my Ogio Blade Stand Bag:
 

TaylorMade Burner 10.5*

Adams Insight BUL 15*
Taylormade RBZ 3H

TaylorMade RBZ 4-AW

Vokey SM4 54-11

Cleveland CG14 58 2 dot wedge

Ping Karsten Series Craz-E putter

Top Flite Gamer


Posted
Thats pretty easy actually. You say the 6 goes 170 and the 5 goes 185. With only those variables like you mentioned, I am assuming that your assuming that you will "nut" both shots.

*10 yards is a 30 footer, but it's still twice the distance of a 15 footer. And it's probably downhill too.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Lol yea I meant 10 yards my fault!

Yea definitely a double breaker, down hill, on a stimp reading of 12

Jim

In the real world most of us amateurs miss more than we pure shots, so that said, I'd choke up 1/4" on the 5 and let er rip. If you nut it, it will go like 180. If you miss a little bit, youll still probably end up the same distance of a nutted 6 iron.......

So in the real world, a choked up 5.

If every shot is pured, its a 6 iron.

In my world, if im on the green, I dont care how far from the cup I am!

In my Ogio Blade Stand Bag:
 

TaylorMade Burner 10.5*

Adams Insight BUL 15*
Taylormade RBZ 3H

TaylorMade RBZ 4-AW

Vokey SM4 54-11

Cleveland CG14 58 2 dot wedge

Ping Karsten Series Craz-E putter

Top Flite Gamer


Posted
Personally I like to take some distance of my clubs, however this is only for the scoring irons where they are made for control/accuracy and not distance. At 175 yards I would go with a normal 6 iron (in this case 170 yds) and have a 15 foot putt. I would consider this a very good shot. In golf somtimes you just have to take whats given to you and not try to force it. What are the chances really at hitting that much better of a shot with the 5 iron than the 6?

Posted

I would go with a 5 iron and lay off the shot a bit. I never have good results when I try to muscle something. As others have pointed out, things can break down in your natural swing.

I do, however, like Kcas77's insight.
At 175 yards I would go with a normal 6 iron (in this case 170 yds) and have a 15 foot putt.

If the pin is playing in the back of the green, I may go with a 6, knowing I will be short and be left with a longer putt. I'd may take that than guestimating how much I need to lay off and end up over shooting the green.

What I Play:

Driver: R9 460
4 Wood: G15

Hy: Callaway FT 3Hy

Irons: AP1 4-PW

Wedges: Vokey 52* & 60*, Mizuno MP-T 10 58*

Putter: Newport Studio Select 2.7

Ball: Nike One Vapor


Posted
I don't buy the whole "leave myself a 15 footer" argument. Golf is a game of misses. Why would you want to put your target, the center point around which your misses will randomly fall, away from the hole itself (assuming no trouble, as the question seems to imply).

Let's play out a couple scenarios:
a) You mess up and hit the ball 10 yards short and 4 yards right. If you aimed for the hole, you are about 11 yards away from the hole. If you aimed for 5 yards short of the hole, you are about 15 and a half yards away from the hole.
b) You hit the perfect shot, exactly where you aimed. If you aimed for the hole, it's a tap in. If you aimed for 5 yards short of the hole, you just wasted the extremely rare event of a perfect shot from over 150 yards, and you are left with a 15 footer which the odds are very low that you will make in one putt.

Why would you not want to aim for the hole? Assuming that you have a random array of misses, wouldn't you want those misses to be centered around the hole itself?

(Sure, someone could point out that a scenario c could be that you hit it dead straight and 5 yards further than intended, but that would be a lucky break, and the point is that you want to aim your shots so that on average you will get the best results.)
Scott T

G5 9° V2 75 X / 909F2 15.5° V2 85 X / 909H 19° V2 100 X / MP-33 #3-PW X100 / X-Forged Chrome 54.15 60.10 X100 / FGP Black 34" / Penta TP

Handicap is a guess because I haven't established one yet.Best score so far is a 71 on a 6,509 yard 70.3/121 par 72 muni, during a glorious...

Posted
I hear what you're saying, laxbballgolf. But remember, many golfers would rather be putting and further from the hole, than closer to the hole but in the rough requiring a chip, pitch, or flop shot.

The best part of my game is my short game, BUT, every once and a while I have those days where I just can't get under it. On those days, I'll leave it short knowing I'll have to 2-putt rather than going after the pin with the risk of over-shooting it and having those tricky short flop/pitch shots. I might end up sculling it or duffing it. Then, all of the sudden, I'm three strokes to my 2-putts.

I guess the lesson from this thread is two-fold. 1) Every golfer has a different philosophy and for different reasons, and 2) there are so many viariables - via the player's skill set, what's working for a player on that day, pin location, etc. etc.

What I Play:

Driver: R9 460
4 Wood: G15

Hy: Callaway FT 3Hy

Irons: AP1 4-PW

Wedges: Vokey 52* & 60*, Mizuno MP-T 10 58*

Putter: Newport Studio Select 2.7

Ball: Nike One Vapor


Posted
Assuming center pin, flat green, equal trouble short and long, I'd hit the 6 since it's easier to hit. A better player might hit the 5 with backspin and suck it down to the hole.

Driver: Nike Ignite 10.5 w/ Fujikura Motore F1
2H: King Cobra
4H: Nickent 4DX
5H: Adams A3
6I 7I 8I 9I PW: Mizuno mp-57Wedges: Mizuno MP T-10 50, 54, 58 Ball: random


Note: This thread is 5804 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.