Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Using a high speed camera to analyze golf swing?


Note: This thread is 5165 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi all,

I average between 100 and 110 for a round of golf, and I'm trying to improve. My swing is pretty inconsistent. I'll chunk the ball on the course about 15% of the time, and I can only hit the fairway with a drive about 30% of the time.

As someone who doesn't know what angles to be looking for, will purchasing a high speed camera to analyze my golf swing be worthwhile? I know the golfing instructors use them, but they also know what to look for.

I was considering buying the Casio EX-FS10 (records at 1000 fps), which only costs around $150.

Posted
1000 fps at 224x64 resolution. You should do some research when it sounds too good to be true.

« Keith »


Posted
I belive a camera is the best training aid one can have. If you don't see what to fix yourself, you can upload the video here, or to an online instructor, like Evolvr.

There is no point in using 1000 FPS at 224x64, it becomes too grainy. The FS10 got 420 @ 224x168, but if I had the camera, I would probably use 210 FPS @ 480x360, that is a good resolution. I know some in here got the Casio FC100, but it's a bit more pricey, I haven't delved into the details to see why. It got 210 FPS @ 480x360 also, so I assume the FS10 is OK.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
I paid under $200 for a tiny Casio that does 210 FPS. The EX-FC100. Well worth the investment.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have thought about doing this as well, trying to find somewhere in Calgary is hard, rather than buying a camera

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted
I have this model. 210fps works for me fine and it has been very useful considering 2 lessons pay for it.

Titleist 909D Comp 10.5º
Titleist 906F2 15º
Titleist 585.H 19º
Titleist 710 AP1 4-PW
Callaway X-Forged 52º, 56º, 60ºTitleist Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Titleist Pro V1x


Posted

I found this video on Youtube:

There are also videos in the sidebar that show the same camera doing full speed, 420fps, and 1000fps.

I'm almost definitely buying this camera as it's only about $150 on amazon. This equates to about 1hr in golf lessons as far as price!


Posted
I have this model. 210fps works for me fine and it has been very useful considering 2 lessons pay for it.

I found this video on Youtube:

which camera? the one that the OP posted?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I have gone to Leadbetter school and using a high speed camera is a must.  I have researched the best camera for the money.  The Casio EX-FC100 as stated by an earlier responder is what I chose.  The newer version EX-FC150 is much more expensive plus bigger.  I purchased mine for under $200 where the FC150 is nearly $300; no additional benefits other than being bigger.  I have also made some big gains by going back to basics by reading Hogan's Five Secrets and some other books regarding the great Ben.


Posted

Originally Posted by Zeph

I belive a camera is the best training aid one can have. If you don't see what to fix yourself, you can upload the video here, or to an online instructor, like Evolvr.

There is no point in using 1000 FPS at 224x64, it becomes too grainy. The FS10 got 420 @ 224x168, but if I had the camera, I would probably use 210 FPS @ 480x360, that is a good resolution. I know some in here got the Casio FC100, but it's a bit more pricey, I haven't delved into the details to see why. It got 210 FPS @ 480x360 also, so I assume the FS10 is OK.

I agree. The best way to know more about it to visit an expert about cameras. They will help you in assemble and what type of camera is  appropriate for that.


Note: This thread is 5165 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,816 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.