Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What does it mean to be a good ball striker?


Note: This thread is 5523 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I often hear commentators on the golf channel saying a particular PGA tour pro is the best ball striker of all time.

What does it mean and how to tell a good ball striker from bad ball striker?

Posted
pretty simple
they knock their iron shots close often.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
"good ball striker" to me is two fold...its very rare that you catch a ball fat, thin, off the toe/heel...and then, you hit the ball where you want it to go 95% of the time.

a great ballstriker or the best of all time should never mishit a ball and should always have it do exactly as he intends.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted
Draw it, fade it, high, low, carve it, float it.... Ball strikers can do it all, and EVERY one looks like their natural preferred shot shape.

The exception being Moe Norman, who many called one of the best ball strikers of all time. I'm not sure he had ALL the shots, but he did have one shot down better than anybody else. Dead straight.

 :macgregor: V Foil 8.5*    :tmade: Mid Rescue 16*  -- :wilsonstaff: RM  2 thru Wedge -- :vokey: 56/10  -- :scotty_cameron: Studio Design 2  & a  :srixon: Z Star 


Posted
Actually, ballstriking has a very real, quantifiable meaning. It's the player who has a combination of the best driving accuracy, and greens in regulation. Ballstriking refers to a person's ability to hit the same shot over and over again, with the smallest margin of error.

The best ballstrikers on the PGA tour are guys like John Merrick, Boo Weekley, Adam Scott, John Senden, Hunter Mahan, etc.

Posted
Actually, ballstriking has a very real, quantifiable meaning. It's the player who has a combination of the best driving accuracy, and greens in regulation. Ballstriking refers to a person's ability to hit the same shot over and over again, with the smallest margin of error.

If only he knew how to putt, lol. It's incredible he can be so high atop the stat boards for tee to green but miss as many cuts and rarely contend like he does. Who wouldn't love to see a guy named BOO on the top of the board every sunday, lol.

I love the way Mahan uses a "game improvement" club for his driver, lol, PING Rapture.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86


Posted
If only he knew how to putt, lol. It's incredible he can be so high atop the stat boards for tee to green but miss as many cuts and rarely contend like he does. Who wouldn't love to see a guy named BOO on the top of the board every sunday, lol.

He's actually had a terrible injury this year, that's why. He's a great player, and he will be back.


Posted
"good ball striker" to me is two fold...its very rare that you catch a ball fat, thin, off the toe/heel...and then, you hit the ball where you want it to go 95% of the time.

Golf god can't even do that for sure.

Ball striking comes and goes everyday. Good players (which I give much more credit then good ball strikers) recognize it and improvise their plans to achieve their goal.

Golf: Agony & Love over 3 Generations


Posted
He's actually had a terrible injury this year, that's why. He's a great player, and he will be back.

Didn't know that. I've been familiar with Boo for several years now. He played a couple times in the BC Open which was held at the course I live just down the street from. Remember the first time I saw him play in it, he was in the sunday morning round by himself (first tee time) and he was wearing a t-shirt, windpants and sneakers, not even spikes, haha. I remember thinking "who the heck is this guy? BOO Weekley?" haha. He seems like a cool guy though. He's stated in interviews that he wants to retire when he makes a certain amount and not play competitively anymore. Good for him, he seems like a guy who really just wants to enjoy life the way he wants too. When he has the talent in golf to make more money than most people could ever dream about making, why not.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86


Posted
Good ball striker - means controlling the ball by means of executing a repeatable swing where the contact point of club and ball is the same time after time. Great ball strikers can wear a tiny spot into the face of their forged irons.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
Actually, ballstriking has a very real, quantifiable meaning. It's the player who has a combination of the best driving accuracy, and greens in regulation.

The only correct answer to the OP.

It does not mean that they hit their iron shots close. In actual fact, it is a bit of a running joke that the best ballstrikers are poor putters, which is why thay talk about their ballstriking. They talk about John Senden's ballstriking a lot. People on this forum are forever talking about working on their "ballstriking", but they misunderstand the term, which is like saying that they are putting with their putter. Ballstriking is a statistical term. If it's not used for that purpose it is totally redundant. Of course you are practising hitting the ball.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
lots of fairways, lots of greens

Cobra S2 Driver
Nike SQ 3 Wood
Nike Sumo SQ 3 Hybrid
Callaway X-16 Irons 3-PW
Nike Victory Red 56 and 60 WedgesScotty Cameron Newport 1.5 Putter


Posted
Golf god can't even do that for sure.

thats why I don't think there are any "great" ballstrikers. Things change too much for someone to always be perfect.

Most every amateur, to me, is above average to well below average. And Shorty, I don't think people are speakin in terms of the stat when they talk about striking the ball..they are talking about consistent strikes. The "stat" doesn't amount to much at all, as you pointed out.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted
Go watch Moe Norman , Lee Trevino , and Ben Hogan on youtube.......... and you will see 3 of the greatest ball strikers that ever lived. I put Moe Norman 1st.

Posted
The only correct answer to the OP.

I disagree that there is only one meaning and that it is statistical.

A good ballstriker also has a better ball flight. A term pro's often use is 'integrity'. If you go to the range anywhere, but particularly at a pro event you don't even need to look for it - YOU CAN HERE IT! Compare Sergio Garcia's or Charles Howell's iron shots with other players and you have another definition that is commonly used in the world of golf.

Driver: Nakashima 10.5 degree
3 Wood: 15 degree F2
Hybrids: 19 and 21 degree
Irons: MP-58, 4-9 iron
Wedges: Vokey sm 47.06, 53.08, 58.08Putter: studio select 2.5Ball: Pro Vx : Warren Golf Club 73.6 : 146


Posted
thats why I don't think there are any "great" ballstrikers. Things change too much for someone to always be perfect.

I guess you've never heard of Moe Norman then?

He was an exception to the rule though. I doubt any of us could practice as much as he did.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
imo a good ball striker is someone who is agressive and attacks hit wedges and short irons to the point where they hit and come back about a foot from the fairway and the min irons take one hop and stop then the long irons have about 6 ft of roll. good ball strikers means that they hit the ball well so i believe that they need to be sticking the ball because if your not sticking it your hitting it fat and letting it run

|callaway.gif X460 Tour Fujikura Tour Platform 26.3 73g | taylormade.gif 2i Rescue 11 |  3i HiBore Hybrid |  710 MB |  Wedge Works 48/06 |  cg12 52/08  | vokey.gifSpin Milled 56/11 | nike.gifSV Tour 60/10 | cameron.gif Studio Select Newport 2 34" |

 

rangefinder : LR550


Posted
imo a good ball striker is someone who is agressive and attacks hit wedges and short irons to the point where they hit and come back about a foot from the fairway and the min irons take one hop and stop then the long irons have about 6 ft of roll. good ball strikers means that they hit the ball well so i believe that they need to be sticking the ball because if your not sticking it your hitting it fat and letting it run

Or you play on rock hard greens. Our greens at the moment, you struggle to make a pitch mark with your 8 iron

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Note: This thread is 5523 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.