Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3759 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I didn't want to hijack the "Who plays by the rules" thread, but I'm curious about this. Golf is known as the gentlemans game, yet it seems pretty common for golfers to cheat. What's the motivation behind cheating? Is it purely ego?

Doesn't it make more sense to just not keep score if you want to play a round for fun than to make the effort to record a fraudulent score?

Cheating also seems counter-productive unless someone never expects to play in a tournament. I'm a 36 handicap, if I go cheat during my next 20 rounds and lower my handicap to 18 doesn't that only works against me if I play in a tournament. I'm still a 36 handicap if you hold me to the rules, which I'd expect one is held to during a tournament so I lose strokes and virtually have no chance of winning.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
not sure if you created this thread aimed at me...

but let me clarify for you once more. do i cheat? no. have my friends cheated before to a low extent that i dont care? yes.

if they take 3 drives off the tee and only count the one that lands on the fairway, of course i'll call them out on it. a particular situation where my friends sets address on a putt and the ball turns 1/2 cm...am i gonna make a big deal about it? no.

now I completely agree with you that cheating in golf is pointless for yourself. I play this game with friends for fun...but the score is for me. I keep score of my own game for my own self improvement so it would be pointless to golf.

i also agree with you that its counter productive for someone in tournament play to lie or cheat about their handicap...only works against them.

but again, if i'm playing with friends, i play by the rules and keep my score...but i'm playing for fun.

DST Tour 9.5 Diamana Whiteboard
909F3 15* 3 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
909F3 18* 5 FW stock Aldila Voodoo
'09 X-Forged 3-PW Project-X 6.0 Flighted
CG15 56* X-Tour 60* Abaco


Posted
not sure if you created this thread aimed at me....

Not at all you made your position clear, sorry if you felt I was accusing you of cheating.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I didn't want to hijack the "Who plays by the rules" thread, but I'm curious about this. Golf is known as the gentlemans game, yet it seems pretty common for golfers to cheat. What's the motivation behind cheating? Is it purely ego?

I think it's the inability of many players to admit to themselves that they aren't as good as they tell everyone they are. So they find ways to shave strokes, not by practice and lessons, but by bumping a ball out of a bad lie, or giving themselves a 3 foot putt that they might actually make less than 50% of the time. Then they rationalize it to themselves that the bad lie was unfair because a tour pro would never have to deal with such primitive conditions. Or it was a simple putt and he makes those all the time so why waste an extra 10 seconds by actually playing the shot? And so on.

And by cheating I don't simply mean not playing by the rules. I mean doing something improperly, then gaining an advantage by doing so... even if the advantage is only stroking your own ego. In such cases you only cheat yourself out of the satisfaction of knowing that you played your best and recorded an honest score. And I can say from experience that there is still a lot of satisfaction in that, even if the score is a 90 something when your course handicap is 12. Some of my best golf bull sessions have been when my buddies and I discuss our greatest failures, rather than our successes.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think that there are several ways of looking at this.

Before a person may be deemed to "cheat" you have to assume that there is a set of rules, that the player knows and has agreed to play by the rules, and then has chosen to consciously disregard one or more rules. My experience is that a person has to take golf fairly seriously before they take the time an effort to learn the rules. The commitment to play by the rules is a personal choice.

Before I started playing golf on a regular basis, I would play casually with several friends. Some groups would allow a mulligan only on the first hole, some would allow one mulligan per nine holes. Almost always someone would improve their lie by rolling the ball a half turn forward and the like. OBs were treated as lateral water hazards. I think these forms of "cheating" are fairly common among non-serious golfers. As long as everyone is OK with it, who cares? The point is to have fun, and we did.

When I started taking the game more seriously, I was shocked to learn that there is no official mulligan rule. Moreover, I think that the rule which requires a person to play out of a fairway divot that some joker rudely chose not to replace is completely unfair, and finally, the last thing I want to do on a busy day on a busy course is to walk back to the tee box with the next group waiting after I discover that the ball which I thought to be on the course has in fact rolled 1 foot into someone's backyard.

That said, I now post scores for handicap purposes. Each and every round I post is played strictly by the rules. It makes no sense for me not to. Also it is a good way to chart your progress (or lack thereof).

Posted
I think fourputt has it. People cheat because they aren't as good as they say they are and therefore need to find some way to take a few strokes off. If you want to have a round where you improve your lie, take multiple tee shots, or whatever, then call it what it is, PRACTICE and don't record a score because it's not accurate. As far as the ball moving while addressing the ball on the green or indadvertedly grounding your club in a bunker, I don't call them on people I play with but I would count it against myself. It's just part of the game and I want my score to be as accurate as possible.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think that there are several ways of looking at this.

I don't agree that ignorance isn't a valid defense. If you're going to keep score and submit your score for handicap shouldn't you make an effort to learn the rules? If you're just playing for fun, then I agree, throw the rules out and don't keep score, since to me it's no different than a range or green session.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't agree that ignorance isn't a valid defense. If you're going to keep score and submit your score for handicap shouldn't you make an effort to learn the rules?

You hit the nail on the head. When I play golf with my brother who's a better athlete but couldn't care less about the rules because he only plays once or twice a year, we don't keep score.

When I play with a friend who bumps the ball on every shot, I don't tell him my scores because I don't want my valid par or bogey next to his cheaty one. Does he turn in his scorecard like I plan on doing with mine? Who cares?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
People who cheat don't care to be able to truly measure themselves against the course or par. I could care less if they do as long as it's not in a tournament. I don't cheat because I want to know my true performance and be proud that when I improve it is honest improvement.
In my bag:

Driver: FT-5, 9° stiff
Wood: Big Bertha 3W/5W
Irons: X-20 TourWedges: X Tour 52°/56°Hybrids: Idea Pro 2/3/4Putter: Black Series #2Ball: NXT Extreme/NXT Tour
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I won't play a shot that might damage my club. Don't care what the rules are in that situation

On busy days I'll play a lost ball where I didn't hit a provisional like a lateral hazard. I've lost a few in the rough at some courses around here

When I go OB and didn't hit a provisional I don't go back to the tee. I drop next to the OB stake and hit 4. I just assume I went back to the tee and hit my next drive the same way except it didn't go OB :D

Posted
It's only cheating if there is a negative effect on someone else. For example, my regular playing partner occasionally rolls the ball to improve his lie. When we play, we don't play for money or even really bragging rights. We play simply because we enjoy playing. He doesn't keep a handicap (officially or unofficially). So in that case, I don't consider it cheating, because it doesn't affect me in any way.
What does stink is that I have avoided inviting him to play in some 2-man team tournaments that are regularly held in our area because I fear either a slip-up (i.e. he improves his lie out of habit) or he gets in a situation where he struggles because he's not used to hitting from less than ideal lies.

In the bag:
Ping G5 Driver 9 degree, Ping G10 3-wood, Nike 3 hybrid, TaylorMade R9 Irons 4-AW, Cleveland CG15 56 and 60 degree wedges, Odyssey 2-ball blade putter


Posted
It's only cheating if there is a negative effect on someone else. For example, my regular playing partner occasionally rolls the ball to improve his lie. When we play, we don't play for money or even really bragging rights. We play simply because we enjoy playing. He doesn't keep a handicap (officially or unofficially). So in that case, I don't consider it cheating, because it doesn't affect me in any way.

Are we playing with the same guy?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
It's only cheating if there is a negative effect on someone else. For example, my regular playing partner occasionally rolls the ball to improve his lie. When we play, we don't play for money or even really bragging rights. We play simply because we enjoy playing. He doesn't keep a handicap (officially or unofficially). So in that case, I don't consider it cheating, because it doesn't affect me in any way.

But wouldn't you say that he's cheating himself. He's certainly cheating himself out the opportunity to be a better golfer. He's cheating himself out the opportunity to join you in those tournaments you refer to. There is more to the definition of cheating than just taking advantage of your fellow competitor. The second part of your post is a good lesson for anyone who plays this way. When you ingrain a bad habit, it can come back bite you in the butt at the least opportune moment. It's hard to turn that sort of playing habit on and off at will. Playing the ball down (or playing by the rules in general) all of the time will do two things. It will make you a better player overall, better able to deal with any situation that you face, and it eliminates the probability of improving your lie out of habit during a competition.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
But wouldn't you say that he's cheating himself. He's certainly cheating himself out the opportunity to be a better golfer. He's cheating himself out the opportunity to join you in those tournaments you refer to. There is more to the definition of cheating than just taking advantage of your fellow competitor.

Even if the guy never wants to play for money or in a competition during his whole golf career, I do agree with you that he's cheating himself. Once a player is not considered a beginner and his buddies insist he plays the ball down on every shot, then he sees how hard the game really is. It feels good to grind out a par from an old divot. Or to get up and down from a footprint in a greenside bunker. It's very satisfying.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I don't agree that ignorance isn't a valid defense. If you're going to keep score and submit your score for handicap shouldn't you make an effort to learn the rules? If you're just playing for fun, then I agree, throw the rules out and don't keep score, since to me it's no different than a range or green session.

I think we are saying the same thing, and I agree with you. Personally, I would recommend that a person play by the rules. I think it will make you a much better golfer and certainly better prepared for competitive golf. That said, I am not troubled at all if people in my group choose to play differently - as long as we are not competing.


Posted
Even if the guy never wants to play for money or in a competition during his whole golf career, I do agree with you that he's cheating himself. Once a player is not considered a beginner and his buddies insist he plays the ball down on every shot, then he sees how hard the game really is.

Too true. A buddy of mine would cheat every round and then boast about how well he did. Even after other players would "remind" him of the rules, he persisted to cheat albeit not quite as much. After a while, nobody called him anymore to play because they got tired of his antics.

:titleist: :scotty_cameron:
915D3 / 712 AP2 / SC Mont 1.5


Note: This thread is 3759 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.