Jump to content
IGNORED

I Love Hitting a Fade!


Ben
Note: This thread is 4318 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

My natural ball flight with my driver is generally a fade, and with my scoring irons my miss is usually a push fade, but unless I need to bend it into a green I prefer neither a fade nor a draw.  I like the ball the start where I want it and go damn straight so it finishes where I want it!

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Exactly, "Loosely" considered...and it couldn't be more wrong.  Most people think that ALL tour pros stock shot is a draw...not true...it's actually the complete opposite.  I don't think people understand what a stock shot it.  Stock shot is a shot that you feel most comfortable hitting in pressure situations.   Tiger, Mickelson, Anthony Kim, Mcilroy, Jb Holmes, Couples, Nicklaus and so on all hit a fade as their go to or stock shot.   Tour Pros hit fades as their "stock" shot because it is a more controlled due to less hand action...they are constantly trying to avoid the dreaded hook.  Yes, they will draw the ball as well but that is because they are freaking tour pros and are able to do it...some better than others.   There are tour pros that fade it all over the course.  And there isn't a 10 handicapper in the entire world that can consistently control both shot shapes...if there is, he must have THE worst short game on the entire planet.  And all I was trying to say on my previous post was to go with what god gave you until you are in the low single digits.  if you hit a slice, work on turning it into a controlled fade.  If your miss is a hook, work on turning that into a controlled 4-5 yard draw.

Originally Posted by Chief Broom

There is a big difference between a controlled fade and a slice.  I think some of this bias comes from the fact that the typical miss for the average high handicapper is a slice.  Whereas after that high-capper learns more about the game and improves they are able to turn that slice into a draw.  So in a way hitting a draw can loosely be considered the "stock" shot shape of the more accomplished golfer.



DRIVER Taylormade R11S w/ Tour AD DI-7S 3 WOOD Taylormade R11S RIP Phenom Stiff 16.5 HYBRID Taylormade Rocketballz Tour Stiff IRONS 4-6 iron Taylormade MC w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff IRONS 7-PW Taylormade MB w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff WEDGES Titleist Vokey SM4 Black Nickel 52.12, 56.11, 60.10 PUTTER NIKE METHOD 001 33', Taylormade Ghost Spider 33' BAG ADIDAS AG Tour Stand Bag BALLS TITLEIST PRO-V1X SHOESADIDAS ADIPURE GPS SKYCADDIE SGX
Link to comment
Share on other sites


People Like that remind me of the guy in the Wilson Staff commercials.  Seriously?

Originally Posted by i-Guy



DRIVER Taylormade R11S w/ Tour AD DI-7S 3 WOOD Taylormade R11S RIP Phenom Stiff 16.5 HYBRID Taylormade Rocketballz Tour Stiff IRONS 4-6 iron Taylormade MC w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff IRONS 7-PW Taylormade MB w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff WEDGES Titleist Vokey SM4 Black Nickel 52.12, 56.11, 60.10 PUTTER NIKE METHOD 001 33', Taylormade Ghost Spider 33' BAG ADIDAS AG Tour Stand Bag BALLS TITLEIST PRO-V1X SHOESADIDAS ADIPURE GPS SKYCADDIE SGX
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by jhwmusic

And all I was trying to say on my previous post was to go with what god gave you until you are in the low single digits.  if you hit a slice, work on turning it into a controlled fade.  If your miss is a hook, work on turning that into a controlled 4-5 yard draw.


I don't disagree, but I think there is a fundamental difference between the controlled fade pros hit and the fade (formally slice) most amateurs hit.  I used my fade/slice to fairly good effect insofar as it got me down to a 15hdc, but then my progress stalled.  That's because my fade/slice was caused by a dramatic over the top swing that had me cutting across the ball.  Those pros you mention hit a fade while swinging on plane and manipulate their shot shape by contrasting their face angle at impact with their swing path. Not to say some of those pros didn't aim as far left as I did when I compensated for my slice, but their ball flight and it's characteristics were dramatically different.  Nicklaus and Trevino both could aim way left but their ball was starting out much closer to their intended line and generally speaking didn't fade an overly dramatic amount (not that they couldn't hit the banana ball when necessary).  My ball flight was probably turning a good 50yrds or more (easily more) because my swing fundamentals were unsound and certainly couldn't produce their kind of power.   When you swing on plane with good fundamentals even a small person like Ricky Fowler can easily hit a 300+yrd tee shot.  That OTT swinger, even a big guy, is doing good to get one out there 200-250yds and that's swinging out of his shoes.

My point is many golfers start out with poor fundamentals and mechanics, and as a general rule slice the ball dramatically, but over time figure out (through trial and error or lessons) how to generate power and that usually means that the dramatic slice disappears and is replaced by the draw (or a true power fade).

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I wasn't disagreeing with you either.  And I agree there is a difference between tour pros and amateurs fades...I never said anything about them being the same.  I think you are reading too far into my post.    And Trevino didn't really hit a fade...he hit a straight ball push.  And rickie Fowler doesn't really have the greatest fundamentals to follow...nor does he stay on plane throughout is swing.  It is a completely home made loopy swing that I wouldn't tell anyone to try and copy.  But the sad thing is, there are a bunch of kids wearing orange flat brim hats trying to swing like him...instead of copying people like Rory Mcilroy who has the best swing on the planet.  There is nothing wrong with copying...I actually urge the kids that I teach to do this...as long as that person doesn't swing like JD.

And yes, most amateurs do have poor fundamentals.  But hitting a draw or fade isn't based solely on fundamentals.  You can take two people who are just starting out and give them the exact same grip, same setup, same clubs and so on, but that doesn't mean they are both going to naturally hit a draw.  It has a lot to do with body type, flexibility, swing speeds.  The factors are endless.   People need to stop being so obsessed with this " on plane" swing that has 85% of you golfers will never accomplish because your bodies won't allow it.  What happened to being athletic and putting the club face on the ball?  Worry about that first.  people are watching too much Golf Channel and reading too many golf magazines and then going to the range and trying all this crap they read.  Some of these guys are trying so hard to be "on plane" that there swings become rigid and they can't hit the ball out of their shadow.  Don't be a ROBOT!!!  Be athletic!

Originally Posted by Chief Broom

I don't disagree, but I think there is a fundamental difference between the controlled fade pros hit and the fade (formally slice) most amateurs hit.  I used my fade/slice to fairly good effect insofar as it got me down to a 15hdc, but then my progress stalled.  That's because my fade/slice was caused by a dramatic over the top swing that had me cutting across the ball.  Those pros you mention hit a fade while swinging on plane and manipulate their shot shape by contrasting their face angle at impact with their swing path. Not to say some of those pros didn't aim as far left as I did when I compensated for my slice, but their ball flight and it's characteristics were dramatically different.  Nicklaus and Trevino both could aim way left but their ball was starting out much closer to their intended line and generally speaking didn't fade an overly dramatic amount (not that they couldn't hit the banana ball when necessary).  My ball flight was probably turning a good 50yrds or more (easily more) because my swing fundamentals were unsound and certainly couldn't produce their kind of power.   When you swing on plane with good fundamentals even a small person like Ricky Fowler can easily hit a 300+yrd tee shot.  That OTT swinger, even a big guy, is doing good to get one out there 200-250yds and that's swinging out of his shoes.

My point is many golfers start out with poor fundamentals and mechanics, and as a general rule slice the ball dramatically, but over time figure out (through trial and error or lessons) how to generate power and that usually means that the dramatic slice disappears and is replaced by the draw (or a true power fade).



DRIVER Taylormade R11S w/ Tour AD DI-7S 3 WOOD Taylormade R11S RIP Phenom Stiff 16.5 HYBRID Taylormade Rocketballz Tour Stiff IRONS 4-6 iron Taylormade MC w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff IRONS 7-PW Taylormade MB w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff WEDGES Titleist Vokey SM4 Black Nickel 52.12, 56.11, 60.10 PUTTER NIKE METHOD 001 33', Taylormade Ghost Spider 33' BAG ADIDAS AG Tour Stand Bag BALLS TITLEIST PRO-V1X SHOESADIDAS ADIPURE GPS SKYCADDIE SGX
Link to comment
Share on other sites


IMO, players get too hung up on certain myths "defining" a good golfer.  For instance, myths such as; good golfers draw the ball, good golfers play blades, good golfers miss putts on the high side, good golfers play from the blue (or further back tee boxes), etc. all don't mean a hill of beans if the player has poor swing mechanics. I don't need to look any further than myself to know that the above myths aren't worth the breath to speak them when it comes defining a good golfer.

Draw (check), blades--albeit just the lower irons because I have a blended set (check), missing putts on the high side (check), play from the blue tee boxes (check)...yet, I wouldn't put myself into the category of a good golfer.  Fortunately, my ballstriking has improved over the past year and my putting has been very good, hence, my handicap dropped into the single digit last year.  However, my ballstriking ability is still too suspect at this point for me to consider myself a good golfer.  If I had to grade myself on ballstriking--using a scale where an A is a scratch golfer and an F is a brand new golfer, I'd rate myself a pretty decent C+.

:titleist: :scotty_cameron:
915D3 / 712 AP2 / SC Mont 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Dude, Mcilroy hits a draw on almost every shot. Usually big push draws, too.

Originally Posted by jhwmusic

Exactly, "Loosely" considered...and it couldn't be more wrong.  Most people think that ALL tour pros stock shot is a draw...not true...it's actually the complete opposite.  I don't think people understand what a stock shot it.  Stock shot is a shot that you feel most comfortable hitting in pressure situations.   Tiger, Mickelson, Anthony Kim, Mcilroy, Jb Holmes, Couples, Nicklaus and so on all hit a fade as their go to or stock shot.   Tour Pros hit fades as their "stock" shot because it is a more controlled due to less hand action...they are constantly trying to avoid the dreaded hook.  Yes, they will draw the ball as well but that is because they are freaking tour pros and are able to do it...some better than others.   There are tour pros that fade it all over the course.  And there isn't a 10 handicapper in the entire world that can consistently control both shot shapes...if there is, he must have THE worst short game on the entire planet.  And all I was trying to say on my previous post was to go with what god gave you until you are in the low single digits.  if you hit a slice, work on turning it into a controlled fade.  If your miss is a hook, work on turning that into a controlled 4-5 yard draw.



Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There are some players who it a pull fade, i believe Colin Montgomery did. I believed Jack hit a push fade, and some players hit straight pushes or straight pulls, some hit pull draws. There isn't a correlation between majors, or championships won and the type of shot you play. Tiger played every shot in the bag, Jack played a push fade, Arnie played a draw. As long as you can do something over and over again the same way, you can play this game really really good. But when i talk pull fade, i am not saying a big sweeping slice. I mean, a slight pull with a slight fade. Basically a very small over the top move, with a slightly open clubface to that swing path.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Fade for President 2012!

Callaway RazrFit Extreme 9.5 w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XHot Pro 15* 3Wood w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XTour 18* 2h w/S300
Callaway XHot Pro 4/5 irons w/S300
Callaway XForged III 5-PW irons w/S300
Callaway Forged 52*/58* Wedges
Odyssey 7 Versa 90
Callaway Hex Black Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Dude, Mcilroy hits a draw on almost every shot. Usually big push draws, too.



I actually knew that...not even sure why I wrote it. I was mad typing and didn't really read what I wrote. oops!

DRIVER Taylormade R11S w/ Tour AD DI-7S 3 WOOD Taylormade R11S RIP Phenom Stiff 16.5 HYBRID Taylormade Rocketballz Tour Stiff IRONS 4-6 iron Taylormade MC w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff IRONS 7-PW Taylormade MB w/ KBS C-Taper Stiff WEDGES Titleist Vokey SM4 Black Nickel 52.12, 56.11, 60.10 PUTTER NIKE METHOD 001 33', Taylormade Ghost Spider 33' BAG ADIDAS AG Tour Stand Bag BALLS TITLEIST PRO-V1X SHOESADIDAS ADIPURE GPS SKYCADDIE SGX
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 5 months later...
Originally Posted by jhwmusic

And yes, most amateurs do have poor fundamentals.  But hitting a draw or fade isn't based solely on fundamentals.  You can take two people who are just starting out and give them the exact same grip, same setup, same clubs and so on, but that doesn't mean they are both going to naturally hit a draw.  It has a lot to do with body type, flexibility, swing speeds.  The factors are endless.   People need to stop being so obsessed with this " on plane" swing that has 85% of you golfers will never accomplish because your bodies won't allow it.  What happened to being athletic and putting the club face on the ball?  Worry about that first.  people are watching too much Golf Channel and reading too many golf magazines and then going to the range and trying all this crap they read.  Some of these guys are trying so hard to be "on plane" that there swings become rigid and they can't hit the ball out of their shadow.  Don't be a ROBOT!!!  Be athletic!

BOOM!!! This is very well written and I especially like this part:

"What happened to being athletic and putting the club face on the ball?  Worry about that first."

From my very first swing I have always faded the ball...it is a pull fade (no doubt) as it is a slight over the top move...but for the most part (for some reason...see quote above) I seem to be able to put the club on the ball and know where it is going...I am currently playing to an 8 but have been as low as a 6 and my lowest round ever is a 74 using this swing (shot 2 under on the front 9 and had one bad hole on the back 9)...anyway my story is that for the last two years I have been going back and forth between my natural swing (fade bias) and a S&T; type swing...I will explain more later but not real sure (???) why I keep trying this as I even putt my best when I use an open stance (Raymond Floyd)...it seems for whatever reason per the quote below I see the game left to right from every aspect:

"You can take two people who are just starting out and give them the exact same grip, same setup, same clubs and so on, but that doesn't mean they are both going to naturally hit a draw.  It has a lot to do with body type, flexibility, swing speeds.  The factors are endless."

I have taken lessons to learn to draw the ball and when I set up that way everything feels like it is sooooooo far to the left of me that my over the top move gets even worse because my hand-to-eye coordination wants to swing to the target...I have been told by quite a few Pro's that I have great hand-to-eye coordination as they see it in my short game (very solid)

Anyway I have been fighting myself for the last two years as this Pro has been trying to convince me to do this S&T; type swing (I say S&T; type because it has many aspects of the S&T; but not all)...he is a very good teacher (Pro) and player (qualified for the 2006 Senior PGA Championship) and he tells me that with the S&T; swing I get into much better positions...I have shot a couple of 78's with this swing but it feels very mechanical and I dont feel like I am in control of the ball...I feel like I am just executing a swing method...I have shot some very bad rounds with this swing as well...BUT I have shot some pretty bad rounds with my fade swing also???

I am not a Pro and have a real job and my application to either process has been spotty at best over the past two years due to work...anyway I can always find some verions of my fade swing and when it is on I hit a lot of PGA Tour quality golf shots (very high, slight fade, great distance control, stops on a dime, etc...)...I am also at least a club longer with my fade swing then this S&T; type swing for some reason???

My biggest problem with my fade swing is off the tee as I do get quite steep (I am 6'4 so my swing tends to be upright) and with a Driver I tend to hit down too much and dont get the distance or control I desire...I am currently hitting a strong 3 wood off the tee as this seems to work better...I think it may just be a matter of finding the right driver (shaft and loft) but have not found it yet.

Bottom line is I have made a committment to my "Fade Swing" for the next year and try to work out a few bugs (off the tee)...

FADE Swings RULE!!!

TEE - XCG6, 13º, Matrix Ozik HD6.1, stiff
Wilson Staff - Ci11, 3-SW, TX Fligthed, stiff

Odyssey - Metal X #7, 35in

Wilson Staff - FG Tour ball 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since I'm not a long hitter I have worked on drawing the ball rather than fading it since I've come back to golf.  I can still hit the fade when needed but tend toward a draw with my driver and hybrids and a straight ball with irons.  I used to hit a fade and feel that that cost me some yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You can talk to a fade..... .....but a hook won't listen!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've worked so long against my constant miss, the push and push-fade, that I never really developed a purposeful fade that I liked.  I can hit a huge soft cut shot that goes like two clubs short and moves hard enough right it might be called a purposeful cut slice on purpose, but never really worked on a purposeful good powerful fade cause I was always fighting so hard against the unwanted push-fade.  Now I've finally started to figure out what release and extension mean and have been trying to overcome my endless push-fade problem by playing only a draw on every shot for now.  Finally starting to feel what having satisfying athletic control over the club face might feel like eventually.

I could definitely see eventually coming back around and wanting to develop a solid purposeful fade that's not 2 clubs short.  As of now I think I'd probably go with the Nicklaus style open stance power push fade so I don't have to learn too many different swing paths (relative to my body) but can instead just adjust stance and aggressiveness of extension and release.  I've tried that purposeful powerful push fade a few times on the course recently when I've hit what I'm trying to hit as a draw straight and left myself too snug up against the trees on the right.  But I haven't been working on the new extension and release long enough yet so when I open the stance a bit and actively try not to double-cross it, closing the face square to the path hitting it way left of the target, then I leave the face WAY open and hit a hard fade/slice that starts even further right than I want and then turns way harder right than I want.  Oh well.  I'll come back to it after I feel in control of the draw.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4318 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...