Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5367 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by franky21

So just because you don't agree with me doesn't give you the right to insult me.

There's a difference between insulting you and insulting what you say.

Quite frankly, I don't care if he does the latter, and that's basically all he's done - insult what you've said.

You're on a forum. What did you expect? People don't just ignore posts with which they disagree.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by franky21

I agree he is very talented and i think he will win enough to put these meltdowns to rest. But he is just very good and has such a beautiful swing you expect a player of his caliber to clutch it out. He was in total control of the masters he looked so good it was just scary. So to finish the way he did you need to at least think of where he is mentally. He was in the same position this weekend and three putted the last par five. If you know Rory you know he eats up the par fives so to see him three putt that green was kind of sad to see. I love his game and really expected him to win last weekend and to see him fold at the end left me scratching my head. I hope he can put it together and win because i am a huge fan of Rory.

Performing under pressure is something that is learned over time and experience.  In some rare instances individuals seem to always choke under pressure but I don't think Rory is that type, time will tell.  I agree he tanked at the Masters, but I don't feel he did in Malaysia, it was more that someone else played better than he did.  The 3 putt on 18 as others have said was more him trying to win it, than play for a tie.  Maybe he had the previous week in his mind and wanted to avoid the pressure of a playoff, or maybe it was a calculated risk that didnt' pan out.  He's a great golfer, and Malaysia proved he can come back from a tough round.

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

All this talk of the 3 putt on the last is pointless. It was either make the putt (for a playoff) or not. He could have taken 7 putts for all I care....at least he gave it a chance


Posted

Originally Posted by newtogolf

Performing under pressure is something that is learned over time and experience.  In some rare instances individuals seem to always choke under pressure but I don't think Rory is that type, time will tell.  I agree he tanked at the Masters, but I don't feel he did in Malaysia, it was more that someone else played better than he did.  The 3 putt on 18 as others have said was more him trying to win it, than play for a tie.  Maybe he had the previous week in his mind and wanted to avoid the pressure of a playoff, or maybe it was a calculated risk that didnt' pan out.  He's a great golfer, and Malaysia proved he can come back from a tough round.

I agree for what he went through at the Masters he played well at Malaysia. I do think he still did tank a little on sunday ,but he did played well.  He did show that he moved on by playing well at Malaysia. So i do respect his efforts and he has handled himself like a gentlemen. But he does have some 4th round demons that he will have to confront some day.


Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

There's a difference between insulting you and insulting what you say.

Quite frankly, I don't care if he does the latter, and that's basically all he's done - insult what you've said.

You're on a forum. What did you expect? People don't just ignore posts with which they disagree.


Being on a forum doesn't mean he needs to be a jerk off by the way he writes. But it is what it is let's stay on topic, i finished school a long time ago so i don't feel the need to have to explain myself or have a situation explained to me. Thanks for your concern but your comment honestly isn't needed.


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by franky21

Being on a forum doesn't mean he needs to be a jerk off by the way he writes. But it is what it is let's stay on topic, i finished school a long time ago so i don't feel the need to have to explain myself or have a situation explained to me. Thanks for your concern but your comment honestly isn't needed.


Dude, chill out. Final warning.

You just called HIM a "jerk off" and yet he has, by and large, responded to what you've written . You're attacking people more than he is, so you're in no place to talk.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To paraphrase my pa, may he rest in peace, franky12's posts are borderline stupid, and not the "smart" side of the border either.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ouch!

Franky baby, stay down! Stay down!

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Originally Posted by franky21

Being on a forum doesn't mean he needs to be a jerk off by the way he writes. But it is what it is let's stay on topic, i finished school a long time ago so i don't feel the need to have to explain myself or have a situation explained to me. Thanks for your concern but your comment honestly isn't needed.

"Being on a forum doesn't mean he needs to be a jerk off by the way he writes. "
Maybe you could take a spoonful of that?

"i finished school a long time ago so i don't feel the need to have to explain myself or have a situation explained to me"

Get your money back

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

you say give him time and it'll come as he's only young.........but it was a 17 year old that beat him on sunday. however, im only playing devils advocate as i think the guy is super talented and will win multiple majors

Cobra S2 Driver
Nike SQ 3 Wood
Nike Sumo SQ 3 Hybrid
Callaway X-16 Irons 3-PW
Nike Victory Red 56 and 60 WedgesScotty Cameron Newport 1.5 Putter


Posted
The OP wrote "If you know Rory you know he eats up the par fives". Well he actually has a very poor record on par 5's in consideration of his length. This was one of the talking points on the radio commentary in the first tournament of the Gulf Swing. If by "eat up par 5's" you mean he nearly always goes for the green in two, then yes. But more often than not he'll three putt on reaching the green, or if just off the green, he doesn't get up & down.

Posted

He just goes out and plays the game. Very similar to Tiger when he was younger

With experience will come LOTS of majors


Posted

I think the fascination with "choking" is kind of annoying.  It's always brought up like we're exposing some dark secret about a player and why they will never live up to their potential.  In this particluar case we are talking about a 21 year old who could very possibly be ten years away from playing his best golf.


Posted


Originally Posted by Slim

He just goes out and plays the game. Very similar to Tiger when he was younger

With experience will come LOTS of majors



Minus the winning, and domination, and skill level.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted


Originally Posted by mck

I think the fascination with "choking" is kind of annoying.  It's always brought up like we're exposing some dark secret about a player and why they will never live up to their potential.  In this particluar case we are talking about a 21 year old who could very possibly be ten years away from playing his best golf.

How someone responds to pressure does tell you something about the person, regardless of the sport.  Some people thrive on the pressure and others whither.  It may not be a dark secret nor does it mean that they cannot change how they handle the pressure but it certainly can impact their ability to live up to their potential.

Most professional athletes, especially golfers employ psychologists to help them with this sort of thing.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Please please let's stop using young Tiger as a measuring stick for Rory.  It's unfair to him b/c he WILL come up short by those standards.

Originally Posted by Slim

He just goes out and plays the game. Very similar to Tiger when he was younger

With experience will come LOTS of majors




Note: This thread is 5367 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.