Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5400 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sad to see Russel go.

Shank is an interesting guy for sure.

Couple of mid handicap type shots on lasts night show - not really scratch or + golf IMO - but maybe they were nervous or something.

Carl is SMART.....like Will said - smarter than golf maybe

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

Watched the show, was really sorry to see Russel go.  But the game on Big Break is sudden death for sure.  Make one wrong move or run into a competitor in elimination challenge that is hot and you're done.  I think Russel had both those things happen in one show.  Russel certainly demonstrated he has the game to be there, just didn't work out this time.  Life surely has its' ups and downs.  But it was a good run and Russel I hope you stay safe and one more time thanks for what you do.

Butch


Posted

I don't get to see the show until Tuesday's rebroadcast. I read all these comments about what happened last night, and I just have to laugh imagining what must have happened. This edition of BB is lots of fun. Its really messing with the contestants' heads.


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by KillaK

I have to say it was a boneheaded move - he had 18 - the game was blackjack - you do not hit on 18 in blackjack - the fact is Shank got into his head with that performance imitating Carls bluffing job.

You don't hit on 18 in blackjack but blackjack is a big part luck. This wasn't a (semi-)random card game - you got to try to hit the ball into a rectangle and determine your own "card."

The fact is Russell missed his mark with virtually each of the shots he hit, didn't he? The "3" spot he was aiming at (Russell, comment please?) was about 70-80 yards away, and he was a full ten yards short (the last ball)?

It was a bit of a weird challenge, but it was basically a test of your partial wedges, and neither Russell nor Shank played that challenge particularly well.

Buying a half a shot continues to be stupid. I love how the guy who was eliminated last week kept bitching about "being beaten straight up." He WAS beaten straight up - the guy didn't need either of his half shots to beat him. Russell would probably admit the same this week - he was beaten straight up.

Originally Posted by bplewis24

Anyway, Carl played really well and I actually like the short Canadian so I was happy to see him survive.  But with these guys now starting to shell out big cash to get half-stroke advantages, it means people like Kent & Will are going to have even more pronounced leads as we get further along into the show.  Maybe that is why they introduce some mystery envelope that has Will flustered next week?  Otherwise those big money guys can simply sit on their cash.


Yeah, they're putting themselves at a serious disadvantage. Delaying the inevitable. But maybe that stupid envelope will change things. Maybe the money is re-shuffled or something stupid. BB isn't above undermining their entire show for a gimmick.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have a feeling Justin will be back later in the season.

On the show when he left, the last words they played of him were something along the lines of "I could beat any of these guys, if miraculously I could come back on the show"

Maybe it was nothing, but it would be funny to see him come back later

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

I was hoping that Russell would last a while simply because he's a contributor here.

As for the game, I don't like it at all.   In golf it's very rare that you don't know what score you have to beat to win.   Playing a game of blackjack with a golf just seems stupid to me.  It should be a skills competition not some dumb ass guessing game.    If they want them to play blackjack, at least let them both know what score they need then shoot for that.

I'm starting to think that the producers of the Big Break are starting to run out of ideas.

Driver: VRS 9.5 degrees

Fairway Wood: 13 degrees
Hybrid: A3 19 degrees

Irons: i20's  Yellow dot

Wedges: Vokey's 52, 56 & 60

Putter: 2 ball

Ball: Penta; ProV


Posted

What do you guys think about John (the guy who beat Carl head-to-head)?  I know we haven't seen a ton of what all of these guys are capable of yet, but Kent & John are starting to stand out to me as two of the stronger players.  And yesterday was the first time I noticed his old-man putter, ha!  On a sad note, that sucks to hear about his father.

Another interesting tidbit, the Canuck (forget his name) that eliminated Russ yesterday has squared off directly against Russ in 3 of 4 episodes by my count (be it in immunity challenges or elimination challenges).  It may have been semi-random every time, but he just appeared to have Russ' number.

Brandon

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

It would be fair to the first guy if the second  knew the score.  This wasn't a guessing game. It was a skill game of how good someone's short game was. You could have done alternating shots or something. As far as if going for it was a good idea, the odds are way different than in a casino.  I have no idea what the right move was (i.e. if Russel had 100 shots, how many would hit a A,2,3) but it might not be as clear cut as it would be in vegas. Given the added info that Shank hit 2 kings in a row during the warm up shots,  going for it might not be as crazy as it seemed. Most of the challenges are a bit gimmicky (i.e. breaking glass). Its part of the show. I am sure if all the contestants played 72 holes, the outcome would likely be different than what happens on the show.

As far as buying the half point, as far as we know you have to do it.  If you are eliminated, the money in your account does you no good. Personally I think it would be interesting if during the elimination round, it was more like a poker tournament where the players go all in and if you have your opponent covered, you are still alive even if you lose. The winner of the elimination challenge gets the pot so going to elimination and winning would be a big boost to a player.  It would probably be a nightmare to produce (you could lose any number of players in a week given you would start having players bust out during the earlier challenges)

Originally Posted by GolfBear

I was hoping that Russell would last a while simply because he's a contributor here.

As for the game, I don't like it at all.   In golf it's very rare that you don't know what score you have to beat to win.   Playing a game of blackjack with a golf just seems stupid to me.  It should be a skills competition not some dumb ass guessing game.    If they want them to play blackjack, at least let them both know what score they need then shoot for that.

I'm starting to think that the producers of the Big Break are starting to run out of ideas.




Posted


Originally Posted by mapa94

The marine isn't the sharpest tool in the shed and he knows it.  What a bonehead move in the blackjack game.



How do you figure that? At this level of competition and caliber player who could potentially play in a pga tournament, you would have to assume the other guy hit 2 great shots to the tune of 20 maybe even a 19 but if I hit a 18 I wouldn't necessarily assume that would be good enough either, and I probably would have gone for 20-21 or bust.  If you don't believe you're capable of hitting the shots that you need to when you need to, you probably don't belong at that level of competition.

 

In my Mizuno Aerolite IV Stand Bag:

Driver: Titleist 910D2 (9.5°, RIP Alpha 70S)
Wood: Titleist 910F (15°, RIP Alpha 70S)

Irons: Mizuno MP-68 Irons (3 - PW, C-Taper S+), Mizuno MP-33 2 Iron (C-Taper S+)

Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled (56.11 - Bent to 54°, 60.07 Tour Chrome, C-Taper S+ DSS)

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 (34")

Ball: Titleist Pro-V1x

GPS: Garmin Approach g5

Most useful training aids (for me) that I use: Tour Striker Pro 7 Iron, Swingyde, Tour Sticks alignment sticks, Dave Pelz Putting Tutor


Posted

You know, when it comes to the elimination round, if the winner got the loser's money....that would make for some interesting golf (x129...I don't know about covering, losing and staying alive...that wouldn't be right).  Ultimately, the last guy standing would get all the money anyway.  But the challenges along the way would be different as guys pogo up and down the money list.


 


Posted

Covering would change the game to the guy the performs the best across all the challenges rather than the one the performs the best on one elimination challenge.. There would be a lot more strategy though and a lot bigger reward for playing well in all the challenges.   I have no idea if it would be better TV. But Big Break:Skins better be an all woman show though

Originally Posted by Doctorfro

You know, when it comes to the elimination round, if the winner got the loser's money....that would make for some interesting golf (x129...I don't know about covering, losing and staying alive...that wouldn't be right).  Ultimately, the last guy standing would get all the money anyway.  But the challenges along the way would be different as guys pogo up and down the money list.




  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by x129

As far as buying the half point, as far as we know you have to do it.  If you are eliminated, the money in your account does you no good.

Others have opted not to buy it, so I don't think that's true.


Originally Posted by Doctorfro

You know, when it comes to the elimination round, if the winner got the loser's money....that would make for some interesting golf (x129...I don't know about covering, losing and staying alive...that wouldn't be right).  Ultimately, the last guy standing would get all the money anyway.  But the challenges along the way would be different as guys pogo up and down the money list.


I'd love that and said something like that on another forum. It might almost make going to the Elimination Challenge and surviving a plausible plan... You can rack up money really fast. Plus if you were going to win the loser's money, buying that half a shot would make for some interesting propositions... if you have $5k and the other guy has $4k, do you beat him straight up and vault to $9k in money or do you sacrifice half and only jump up to $6500?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have to agree with a few of the guys here - the blackjack game would have been a lot better if the cards weren't secret.  The guys with more money in the bank could get the slight advantage of going second and knowing what he has to beat.  I didn't understand why the "cards" were kept quiet - seems to me the challenge would have been more interesting if a guy knew he had to hit a certain number and went for it.

On another note - I'm starting to think that Carl is using his "strategy book" as a way to just screw with everyone elses head - I'm doubting that hes really even writing anything in it? especially after that great bluffing performance he put on in the last challenge.  I also think its cool how Carl and Shank are becoming friends on the show - they really seem to have a lot of respect for each other.  After the first show I thought I wasn't going to like the cast of characters they put together but I have to say now I'm hooked - I've watched every show.

Driver: '09 Burner
3Wood: Burner
Hybrids: 3 hybrid and Austads Pickle 26 degree
Irons: Rac os2 PW-4
Wedges: Vokey 48, 52 and 56 degreePutter: RossaBag: Sasquatch TourPushcart: 2.0Ball: Prov1 GPS: freecaddie software running on cellphone


Posted


Originally Posted by x129

As far as buying the half point, as far as we know you have to do it.  If you are eliminated, the money in your account does you no good.


The money does do you good, however, if you remain on the show.  If you spend half your cash in one elimination challenge, then you will often be in a half  stroke hole the next time you go to an elimination challenge, since the person with the higher dollar total gets the half stroke.

It is a sucker bet plain and simple.  The only thing that a second half stroke does is buy you a tie when you are one stroke down.


Posted

That is a real big only.  There is a huge luck component involved here (something like 6 shots). Even if your significantly better than your opponent at this level (lets call it scratch golf) there is a good chance of the better playing losing.  Yeah you will be in a bad spot if your in the next elimination challenge. But hopefully you start playing good golf and don't go back there for a while and that there will be challenges where you can gain ground back on your competitors.

Originally Posted by Jeremy517

The money does do you good, however, if you remain on the show.  If you spend half your cash in one elimination challenge, then you will often be in a half  stroke hole the next time you go to an elimination challenge, since the person with the higher dollar total gets the half stroke.

It is a sucker bet plain and simple.  The only thing that a second half stroke does is buy you a tie when you are one stroke down.




Posted


Originally Posted by tjcdas

Shank is not that bright, the bluff would have been acting excited at hitting the 5 to make it appear he had a good hand.  His bluff seemed to be he was not sure it he should take another shot---a weak hand.  Not sure what the guy was doing hitting 18 after the weak bluff.

I thought the exact opposite... it was a double bluff. Carl spent a lot of time acting as though he was making a decision holding a 15, when he really had a 21. Shank acted like he was making a decision over a 15, when he had a 15. Bluff the same as the previous bluff even though you don't hold the same hands. Genius.


Posted

I agree that the half stroke is BS and allowing the same player to buy another half stroke makes it worse.  I know it is about entertainment but it ought to be somewhat about golf too.  It would be more interesting if the low money guy had the opportunity to buy a half stroke to even the elimination challenge up.  But these challenges seem to be "quick kill" sort of contests and giving someone a full stroke advantage just doesn't seem equitable to me although so far it really hasn't made a difference (unless as Carl told Shank to buy the other half stroke to unnerve Justin, which maybe it did).

Butch


Posted

I don't know if this has been answered yet (haven't been through the entire thread) but I found this link:

http://www.golfchannel.com/tv/?a=vv#allShowsHeading

Seems to indicate you can watch the older seasons online.

In my  bag: 

 Diablo Octane Tour 9.5, 18  -  6DT 19 (3I Hybrid) - 

 Diablo Forged Irons 5-PW -  Tom Watson wedges 52,56,60 - 64 (generic) 

 D.A.R.T. Belly Putter

 B330-RX Balls


Note: This thread is 5400 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.