• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
clubhousehero

Adams A4r vs Adams A7

19 posts in this topic

Today i was hitting some irons at Dicks b/c of all the rain in the NE.  I hit a couple brands and was wowed by the Adams a4.  Seemed like every shot was right on top of the previous one.  Then i went and got an A7 and maybe hit that one even better...maybe.  They were so close i couldn't tell.  I was hitting the a7s slightly further but not much and maybe a little tighter, again not by much.  the a7's were stiff shaft and the a4's were regular, which may have played a part in it.  They did have the a4's in stiff in the back, maybe i'll go back and try those.

Anyway, the a4's were $100 cheaper and the set was 4h and 5i-gw.

the A7's were 3 and 4 hybrids and 5-pw.

I currently have a nike 53 degree GW that i like and a cobra baffler 3h that i like so the set combos don't help any.

Thoughts?  experiences with either or both?  Any and all info appreciated.  Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I just got the A7's.  I tested the A4's at Dicks as well and I felt like they were slightly less forgiving.  Im a much better swimmer than I am a golfer, so i leaned more towards the A7's.  Despite my frequent crappy shots, the A7's have performed really well up to now (Ive had them for a few months).  If anything, I think I just want to replace the grips on them, but thats personal preference.

By the way, if you want a good deal, look for a reputable seller on ebay.  I picked mine up for around $260 shipped brand new.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If its the correct A4's Im thinking of, there is a pretty significant difference, at least to me. The A4's are forged. The A7's are not forged. That being said, when I was looking for my new clubs I tried the A4's, the A7's, and the CB2's. I chose the CB2's, because they are forged and the feel was incredible. Oddly enough I wound up buying the A7 hybrids anyways. Haha. Seriously though, you really can't go wrong with any of those clubs or any of the Adams line these days. If you have a high handicap and don't really plan to drop significantly the A7's would in all honesty work best.

Good Luck!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play the A4s and the are very good clubs.  They have a smaller head than the A7s but are forgiving.  They also are fairly high launch, which is why they are set with the DGSL shafts.  I wanted forged clubs without any plastic on the head, so I went the with A4s.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks everyone, I ended up getting the A4's. I hit both iron sets about the same but the a4's completed my set better and were $100 cheaper.  All i needed to do was have my 53 wedge bent to 54 and now my wedges are perfect.  45, 50, 54 and 58!

Also, they felt really nice just chipping on my carpet, i just can't wait to game them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by clubhousehero

Thanks everyone, I ended up getting the A4's. I hit both iron sets about the same but the a4's completed my set better and were $100 cheaper.  All i needed to do was have my 53 wedge bent to 54 and now my wedges are perfect.  45, 50, 54 and 58!

Also, they felt really nice just chipping on my carpet, i just can't wait to game them.


If I look at the Adams website irons section I do not see A4's?.  If I search Adams's A4's they pop up on the Adams website.  Are they current?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They were replaced by the CB2 irons.  Both have similar forging with the CB2 having a tiny bit more mass behind the sweet spot.  I have the CB2 4 iron and use it with the A4 set.  They hit very similar.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by boogielicious

They were replaced by the CB2 irons.  Both have similar forging with the CB2 having a tiny bit more mass behind the sweet spot.  I have the CB2 4 iron and use it with the A4 set.  They hit very similar.



Thanks the CB2 is on my short list.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hope this is useful:  Used to game A2OS until I demo'd A7OS.  Not a marginal improvement across the board in performance, sound, feedback.  A quantum improvement.  Maybe the best irons in my 30 years of obsession with golf equipment.  So much so, that after I bought the set in graphite.  I decided I wanted my backup to be the same set in steel.

There is a bewildering amount of equipment aimed at the mid-handicapper.  Every major brand has a shortcoming, IMHO.  MIzuno's steel feel harsh when missed out toward the toe.  Callaways lack responsiveness.  Ditto Cobra, Cleveland.  Pings are no longer made by engineers.  They are made by a marketing company.  Their best work is behind them.  Example:  The A705s are light years better than G15 and Rapture V2.

These sticks made the gold category two years' running in Golf Digest.  The publication does not have a monopoly on wisdom but you can get an idea of what their testers discovered with these irons.

Good luck.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hit both and couldn't tell much of a difference so I bought new sets of both. I took the A4R's out for a round 1st and after said round I promptly sold the A7's without removing the plastic. I still have the A4R's in the bag right now.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




If I look at the Adams website irons section I do not see A4's?.  If I search Adams's A4's they pop up on the Adams website.  Are they current?



Folks, he is talking about the "retail' A4R irons and hybrid set. They are current, but for some reason not on Adams website. The A4 Forged are not a current model and you have to search to get the old website link.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a complete set of the cast Adams A4r's.  I was contemplating buying the forged A4 gap wedge and sand wedge.  I've seen people suggest combing sets in this manner in a discussion with the JPX800 (cast) and JPX800 (forged) and wanted to get people's thoughts. Thanks in advance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a complete set of the cast Adams A4r's.  I was contemplating buying the forged A4 gap wedge and sand wedge.  I've seen people suggest combing sets in this manner in a discussion with the JPX800 (cast) and JPX800 (forged) and wanted to get people's thoughts. Thanks in advance.

Purely based on preference. I, personally, have 2 other sets of wedges that I carry no matter what irons I'm using that day and I believe the major, majority carry wedges that do not match there irons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Purely based on preference. I, personally, have 2 other sets of wedges that I carry no matter what irons I'm using that day and I believe the major, majority carry wedges that do not match there irons.


Yep, my sand wedge that greatly improved my plan 15 yards and in is a Cleveland.  I have a problem with "independent wedges" on fairway lies from outside that range though ... otherwise I would get a Cleveland 52 degree gap wedge and bend it down to 50 or 51 to match my previous set. I was hoping that getting forged in the GW and SW will improve my feel & consistency in my 20-100 yard game.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I purchased the A7's approximately a year ago and could not be happier. Really pure club and I only paid $299 at The Academy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the place for this. I was looking at both the A4 and A7. I chose the A7. I was looking for a graphite set due to my swing speed being so low.

The golf store listed the A7 as a graphite set. I was looking more into the set and it's features online and a few sites list the hybrids as having graphite shaft but the irons having a flex steel.

I'm now a bit concerned. I do know that come sets come in both steel and graphite. Can anyone shed some light for me?

The shafts has a label on it that stats, 85 series S-Flex. Did they list this set correctly by stating it's a graphite set or did I get 'shafted'.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Dimplings

Pings are no longer made by engineers.  They are made by a marketing company.  Their best work is behind them.  Example:  The A705s are light years better than G15 and Rapture V2.

Now theres a personal opinion, as well as a load of crap.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • There are several statements that I disagree with which I feel are important to discuss: All golf balls do not go about the same distance.  A low compression, 2-piece Surlyn covered model will launch higher and with less spin than a 5-piece, high compression urethane covered model which will result in a noticeable difference in distance off the tee.  Dean even stated in another answer "The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance." Regarding balls for different swing speeds and compression:  3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing?  DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there…            I almost don't know where to start on this one.  The concept of designing golf balls based on swing speeds doesn't teach or force players to use a low compression ball...it's about using a ball that has the appropriate compression for your swing speed.  Some players will have better results with a higher compression ball, others will have better results with a lower compression.  Keep in mind, there is a difference between "lower compression" and "low compression".  Most of the urethane tour balls have a compression rating somewhere between the mid 70s to mid 90s.  Tour models like the Chrome Soft, B330-RX and B330-RXS are in the mid 60s, which is lower.  Balls like the Supersoft and e6 are in the upper 30s and 40s, which is considered low.  Dean's statement that "low compression balls have the lowest spin on all shots" is somewhere between a little misleading and flat-out wrong.  It's true that a lower compression ball will spin less (and launch higher) than a firmer ball on full shots.  But on short game shots around the green, the ball is not compressed.  On pitch shots, chip shots, and greenside bunker shots for example,    the only part of the ball that is being activated is the cover. Notice on this chart that the lowest compression ball is very close to the highest spinning, and the lowest spinning ball has almost the same compression rating!  The point is, compression has little to no affect on short game shots...the cover is the main factor.  All 4 of these models have a urethane cover, but the two that provide the most spin have softer covers.  To put this in context, the chart below was a test Golf Digest did in 2015 which shows the performance on a partial wedge shot (I think it was 40 yds) with most of the balls on the market at the time The different colors represented the price point.  These results don't match the first chart I posted exactly which can happen when player testing (this one shows the B330 has higher spin than the RXS). Is there a difference between the lower spinning "red dots" and the highest spinning?  Sure.  There should be though.  Golf balls are designed to have different types of performance for different types of players.  The B330-RX has the lowest spin among the red dot models, but that doesn't mean it's lacking in performance...it spins exactly how the ball designers intended it to, because not everyone wants/needs maximum spin.  Notice the e7...this is a high compression ball very comparable to the B330, but has very different spin characteristics. So again, higher compression doesn't mean higher spin around the green and lower compression doesn't necessarily mean low spin.  About the only thing that I could agree with Dean's comment on would be that all the ultra-low compression balls are Surlyn covered models designed for distance, so it's true that these balls have low spin on all shots and will not offer the same level of performance around the greens, but again, that has more to do with the cover than the compression.  The fact is, there are lower compression balls that perform at the highest level. The B330-RXS is the same type of ball as the Pro V1 in many respects, and performs just as well as, or even better for many players, so I'm surprised by his comments that fitting for swing speed is over-rated and lower compression balls have no performance.  That's like saying getting fit for the correct shaft flex is over-rated, and softer flex shafts don't perform as well as stiffer shafts!  Does anyone consider the Dynamic Gold S-300 to be a lower performing shaft than the Dynamic Gold X-100?  No, of course not. They are designed to do the same thing, but because some players don't swing as fast as others the softer flex will give them better results, just like the B330-RXS is the equal to the B330-S, but will fit players who don't swing as hard better. I'm also not on-board with the opinion that fitting with a driver is a "mistake" and when testing to choose a ball based on 100 yds and in.  I'm not saying that short game performance isn't important, but wow...to claim that testing with a driver is a mistake is ridiculous.  I'll make a simple point on this...anyone can hit good wedge shots with a Pro V1 or B330 or Z-Star.  Fast swingers, slower swingers, high handicappers, low handicappers...it doesn't matter, they can all get good results on wedge shots.  Does that mean that's the ball they should play, and it will work equally as well for the other aspects too?  No.  A wedge can mask any issues in performance because of the loft and backspin, but the driver exaggerates issues.  The same players who hit respectable wedge shots with various tour balls might struggle to keep shots in play or lose potential distance. And before anyone tries to use the old "the driver is used 14 times a round, but half of the shots are inside of 100 yds" argument...save it.  If you play a high spin ball and you're struggling to hit the fairway with your tee shots, that ball will not help you save shots around the green.  Too much spin for players who can't control it is worse than a lower spinning model. Sorry Dean...not trying to blast you or anything, just putting in my two cents.  Ok, maybe more like four cents!
    • So......Is this your point @Jack Watson?
    • https://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/titleist_716_ap1_review My review for the site is above. I've been using them since writing this review. Excellent clubs. One watch out is with short game shots with the PW and GW. They will go a bit farther than a corresponding chip or pitch with the equivalent wedge. The ball feels like it jumps off the face with good contact. So be careful with that.
    • Thanks for all the comments. I realize change is always hard but single length, lie and weight make so much sense to me. I am going to build a set of Value Golf clubs and see what happens. As improve I may go back to normal but who knows.  I think it will be better for learning the overall game. Which in my opinion and observance needs a lot of help. In my other hobbies that required learned skills it was easy to find groups to help you with the skills and drills to improve them. Businesses that the hobby supported held seminars and workshops covering all aspects. Trying to find help, other than paid lessons, is impossible, at least in my area. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon