Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4991 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'm waiting for someone to tell me that Nick Faldo wasn't very well known until he became a golf analyst for CBS


I have been a big golf fan for a long time and I know who is good on the Euro tour.  But unless you have watched it and followed it, you probably wouldn't know those guys.

But you really think Phil and Ernie are more physically gifted??  That is crazy.  Tiger had the perfect golf build, was the greatest junior player, and was a scratch golfer at some rediculously young age.  Both those guys had all the opportunities (if not more) and their careers equal his combined.  FYI I like both of them way more than I like tiger.

Brian


i second the tiger as more physically gifted. he could have gone to college running track or golf, don't think the same could be said for ernie or phil. put it this way, who would you rather have on your basketball team?


I read most of the back and forth on the "anti European" part of the discussion and have an opinion.  I think we Americans are a competitive people and would surely like to see Americans from the PGA tour in all the top ten spots.  That doesn't make us "anti European", we're just rooting for the home team.  I don't, and don't believe most Americans, under estimate the ability of the European top players and appreciate good golf no matter who is playing it.   But I would still rather see the USA in the top spots and believe that will happen again.  But if you really think the USA is anti European you don't know your own history very well.  Golf is just a game and we root for the home guys all the time, but we don' t under appreciate the competition nor do we root against them.  After all I think most of us, but certainly not all,  have European roots.  I'm a second generation American myself and still have family in the "old country".   Erin go Bragh!    Sorry if I got off subject but believe I answered the OP in a round about way.

Originally Posted by deasy55

Another anti European I see. They seem to be popping up all over the place lately



Butch




Originally Posted by ghalfaire

I read most of the back and forth on the "anti European" part of the discussion and have an opinion.  I think we Americans are a competitive people and would surely like to see Americans from the PGA tour in all the top ten spots.  That doesn't make us "anti European", we're just rooting for the home team.  I don't, and don't believe most Americans, under estimate the ability of the European top players and appreciate good golf no matter who is playing it.   But I would still rather see the USA in the top spots and believe that will happen again.  But if you really think the USA is anti European you don't know your own history very well.  Golf is just a game and we root for the home guys all the time, but we don' t under appreciate the competition nor do we root against them.  After all I think most of us, but certainly not all,  have European roots.  I'm a second generation American myself and still have family in the "old country".   Erin go Bragh!    Sorry if I got off subject but believe I answered the OP in a round about way.



I'm sorry but someone saying that nobody would have ever heard of McDowell, Kaymer and Donald if Tiger was still in his prime is both a ridiculous statement and anti European. If he had mentioned various players then fair enough....but he decided to mention 3 of the top European players. I will leave it at this but I am disappointed to say the least.




Originally Posted by deasy55

I'm sorry but someone saying that nobody would have ever heard of McDowell, Kaymer and Donald if Tiger was still in his prime is both a ridiculous statement and anti European. If he had mentioned various players then fair enough....but he decided to mention 3 of the top European players. I will leave it at this but I am disappointed to say the least.

" I was merely pointing out that some lesser known players have had an opportunity to come to the forefront due to Tiger's absence.  I could have used Stricker, Kuchar, Casey, or Mark Wilson just as easy.  I simply used them because they are the hot topic players."

Why are European's so sensitive and defensive?  I think Donald is a wonderful talent, but he would not have been #1, no would have Kaymer or Westwood.

I am not "anti-European", I love the global talent influx.  The Austral-Asian tours, South-African, and South American players are great for the game.



  • Administrator

Originally Posted by deasy55

I'm sorry but someone saying that nobody would have ever heard of McDowell, Kaymer and Donald if Tiger was still in his prime is both a ridiculous statement and anti European.


I disagree.

Now, let's move on and get back to the original topic.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by deasy55

I'm sorry but someone saying that nobody would have ever heard of McDowell, Kaymer and Donald if Tiger was still in his prime is both a ridiculous statement and anti European. If he had mentioned various players then fair enough....but he decided to mention 3 of the top European players. I will leave it at this but I am disappointed to say the least.


I think you read way too much into his picking a few examples of players who have done well recently.  Yes, they happened to be European, but I don't think that was why he picked them out.  No need to make it more than it is.  The point is there are probably more than a few golfers getting attention simply because there are more people winning when it's not Woods every week.

On topic, I'm sure it's frustrating competing with someone as dominant as Woods was.  Good competitors appreciate a challenge, but at the end of the day it's discouraging to lose repeatedly, and perhaps moreso to the same guy over and over.  I'd think, even if you're friends with Woods, at some level you have to be jealous of his success, even if you've had your own great successes.  Doesn't mean you don't like him, just that you'd rather be the guy doing the winning.

There are studies that show that people aren't content just having "enough," they're more satisfied when they have more than their peers, even when they're worse off in the absolute.  Basically, people have an innate drive to come out ahead.  This is massively overinterpreting those studies, but it could suggest the fact that Els might have earned more thanks to having Woods raising interest in golf is less consolation than it "should be" since he looks over and sees that he's "losing" relative to him.  Completely irrational, but I think we can all relate on some level.

But it's not fair to single out Woods as the "Dream Crusher."  Every era has its dominant figure.  Only one golfer can be the dominant best at a time, and I have a bit of trouble being too sympathetic to Els' plight given the success he's had.  I'd say he's lived the dream pretty well, even if not quite everything went his way!

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Well my answer to the OP is I believe the other pros in the Tiger era felt like they better get back to the practice tees and fitness trailer and get a lot better if they expected to win again.  I doubt they resented Tiger but were rather inspired to raise their game to be competitive.  Any other attitude  would have been destructive and the PGA touring pros are not put together that way or they wouldn't be there.

Butch


When I think of a dominance like Tiger's, I think of other sports dominated by one player or team. There are some periods like that in the NBA, like the Celtics/Lakers run. If you weren't on the Celtics or Lakers, it pretty much sucked to be you. I remember reading more than one "outside" player's semi-resentment toward those that dominated. Not that they hate them for being good, but for ensuring that almost no one else got championship rings for a decade. It's unfortunate when your career happens to fall in the middle of someone else's reign. Everyone wants certain trophies to decorate their mantle. The flip side, though, is that a couple of challengers to the dominator will be remembered. Not everyone who wins a major gets remembered for forever, but if you're one of the two or three people who constantly fought the seemingly omnipotent dominator, your name may be recorded better than if you'd simply won a couple more times. The down side to that, though, is that there are only a couple of spots for being the arch-rival. Everyone else doesn't win or get to be remembered as the arch-rival. At least they get to learn from the best and their battles will make for cool stories to tell their grandkids. :-D

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster

His game isn't the reason they don't like him. It's his personality and morals (lack of).


Thanks for sharing. Perhaps one day you'll make a post that can't be summarized as "I hate Tiger Woods."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Other Pros hate tiger because he is probably the father of several of their childs.

Seriously though Americans seem to be obsessed with having all their sports stars talk rubbish about God and family all the time. Tiger did all that crap so it made his downfall even more funny




Originally Posted by ghalfaire

Well my answer to the OP is I believe the other pros in the Tiger era felt like they better get back to the practice tees and fitness trailer and get a lot better if they expected to win again.  I doubt they resented Tiger but were rather inspired to raise their game to be competitive.  Any other attitude  would have been destructive and the PGA touring pros are not put together that way or they wouldn't be there.



100% agree that Tiger inspired some of his fellow pros to raise their fitness level.  I also think that the world-wide publicity and big purses that Tiger contributed to has attracted more good athletes to the game of golf world-wide...one of the reasons why there are so many non-Americans doing well- not a slip in the level of play from US youth, but rather a greater interest in the game among the youth of other countries.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


I have no problem with the euro's.  I like good golf and they seem to have their fair share.  The European tour will always be the kid brother to the American tour.  The PGA Tour is just deeper, much deeper.  But The euro's have the upper hand when it comes to the top 15 in the world.  Although all too often the European tour means the rest of the entire world in many cases.  Which by all accounts should answer why the rest of the world can produce some good golf as opposed to one country.  I like good golf and I don't really care where it comes from.


Note: This thread is 4991 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: 2/16/2025 Rince and Repeat: Just like yesterday I spent several 5-10 minute sessions working on what I learned on Friday.   
    • Quick update. So, I got the PXG Secret Weapon and I have to say I like it... mostly. (see below) I spent some time with it on the range and I even gathered some data in doors. I'm not going to post data yet, as my swing is still a bit of a work in progress and I'd like to gather some more data after I settle down a little bit more. But here's my review.  First as a driver replacement. ... IMO it is not a replacement, it's clearly more of a supplement... for me anyway. Not long enough to really replace the driver. For me it's about 20 yards short of my driver. It is longer than my 30-wood off the tee. (15 yards-ish) I will say it is easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. I get some of my best shots teeing it low, but I also get some of my worst. If I tee it about a full inch off the ground I get very consistent shots. Super repeatable. Amazingly repeatable even with my messy swing. Off the tee, I find it draw biased just a bit. You can tinker with the set up if that isn't your personal cup of tea.  As a 3-wood replacement. For me it's about perfect. It's longer than my 3-wood off the deck (my data showed 10 yards longer) and it has a gentle fade to it, which I love. You do need a clean lie, but I never hit my 3-wood off anything but a clean lie anyway. I found it interesting that I hit a gentle fade off the deck and a slight draw off a tee. I'm sure that's not uncommon. Again, you can tinker with the set up to optimize that if you wanted to... I don't want to.  It's clearly a lot longer than my 3-wood off the tee. Easier to hit off the tee than my 3 wood, and off the deck it's also longer. So, it's a no-brainer 3-wood replacement for me. I will say that over the years I've learned to use my 3-wood for this low-flying-100-yard-punch-out-from-under-a-tree shot.  I'll have to see if the Secret Weapon can handle that duty. But it's going in the bag to replace the 3-wood.  I also turned my 5-wood down from 19 degrees to 17 degrees. ... Incidentally my 3-wood had been 16 degrees. I used to always hit my 5 wood and my hybrid about the same distance. This adjustment helps my gapping a bit at the top of the bag. I can clearly hit my 5-wood farther than my hybrid now.  Overall on the PXG Secret Weapon. The good: It's clearly longer and easier to hit off the tee than my 3-wood. It's a bit longer off the deck than my 3-wood.  It's super forgiving... surprisingly so.  It's uber adjustable. ... Although I do suggest getting fit for it. That will save you having to (or wanting to) buy a weight kit just to try out the infinite number of set ups. The headcover is super cool.  The maybe not so good: Shots out of the middle sound great. Shots off the heal sound great. Shots off the toe sound ... what's the work... clangy? It's very forgiving off the toe and the heal. The flight and the distance are incredibly consistent. But the sound off the toe isn't great.  For me I tend to draw it off the tee and fade it off the deck. You can set it up to be biased either way, but in my hands I think if I set up a draw off the deck, that might induce a duck hook off the tee. ... In fairness that could also be where my swing is at right now.  It's pretty spendy. ... If I really stop and think about it, I paid $450 for a new 3-wood. Granted it's a better performing 3-wood. But for me it's really a 3-wood replacement.
    • I've got my pain mostly under control and the meds are working.   I'd like to join. 
    • I would definitely attend if my calendar allows.
    • Finland: I've played Mid-Night Golf in Finland. Really cool. I looked at the schedule for my week out there and I saw that we were teeing off at 9PM... Feels weird, 9 PM tee time. But it was really great. We finished well after 1AM and sat around and drank on the golf course terrace. It was cool. It's really easy to loose track of time when the sun doesn't set.  Here's a picture of me in Finland hitting my approach on the final hole. It's roughly 1:30AM in this photo.  Egypt: Another cool experience was playing golf in Egypt. The entire course is sand. The greens are called browns, cuz they are just sand with oil poured on them and pounded down a bit. Your ball gets kind of oily when you putt, but the caddy cleans it for you after each hole. You carry around a little piece of fake grass (maybe 2 foot square) and place your ball on it each time before you hit. That is except when you go into a sandtrap. The sandtraps are just areas marked off where you don't get to use your little piece of astro-turf. Sometimes they are dug down a bit to make a bunker, sometimes not.  Spain: No special events or anything, but I played a bunch of golf in Spain in the mid-1990's. At that time Spain's economy wasn't doing the best and Europe hadn't quite switched to the Euro. So Spain was using the Peseta. The country of Spain has some incredibly breathtaking courses. (incredible scenery in general) But because of the conversion from the dollar to the Peseta (If memory serves it was 150 to 1), I got to play them for what I remember as being incredibly inexpensive prices. Gorgeous country and really nice people.  Holland or The Netherlands: I lived for a couple of years in what's called The Flevoland in Holland. It's one of the Dutch provinces and it's all land that was recovered from the sea. So, it's all under sea-level. One of the courses I played a few times out there had flags on every hole to show just how deep the water would be if it wasn't for the dams. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...