Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5232 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

im sure i will get some heat for this.....but besides the length....it looks very easy.  Each fairway I saw was HUGE!!!  In short...yes it was boring.


Posted

It doesn't look easy to me. But there aren't many if any "memorable" holes. The greens, the fairways, the traps, the trees, look all the same.


Posted

Most boring course? No.

One thing that bothered me was, when they showed the blimp camera, you could see the north course, and it looked MUCH more scenic. And it's also part of Firestone, so I would expect the course to be just as tough, or even more so than the south course.


Posted


Originally Posted by FowlPlay

Most boring course? No.

OK. So maybe I was a bit harsh.

Maybe there wasn't much to work with terrain-wise in that part of Ohio.

But I'm still yawning pretty hard.



Posted

I agree that Firestone is pretty boring but it certainly didn't look easy to me. They looked like some pretty small fairways to me, although the greens seemed pretty straightforward


Posted

Boring?  no way..  Trust me Firestone is anything but boring.. I've played both North and South and found them challenging.. Both courses require accuracy off the tees.. no doubt..  West course has HUGE fairways compared to the the other two and much shorter..  There are plenty of elevation changes to keep you busy, which you can't see from the blimp, or even from the TV cameras..  Best way to experience Firestone is to just be there :)


  • Administrator
Posted

It's one of the most boring courses I've ever played, yep. Elevation changes can't make up for the fact that it's boooooring. Good luck remembering too many of the holes or being able to separate them mentally without a devoted effort.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Firestone-South was originally laid out in the 1920s by an amateur architect named Bert Way; this explains why sixteen holes run parallel to each other, with no regard to the site's topography. When Robert Trent Jones was hired to turn the course into a championship test in the early 1960s, all he could really do to such a pedestrian routing was stretch the course length to its maximum and narrow the fairway corridors with bunkers and trees. With today's technology, long and straight doesn't present the same challenge to top professionals as it did for previous generations. The qualities that make the South course still difficult today (uneven fairways, overhanging limbs) are more negative than positive.

The sad thing is that the North course, which Jones built after his renovation of the South, is likely the superior course on the property, with a dramatic set of finishing holes bordering a lake. Unfortunately, the South had already gained its reputation as "the Monster" by the time it opened, so the North has hosted pro tournaments only sporadically, on occasions the South has been closed for maintenance.

  • Upvote 1

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted


Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

The sad thing is that the North course, which Jones built after his renovation of the South, is likely the superior course on the property, with a dramatic set of finishing holes bordering a lake. Unfortunately, the South had already gained its reputation as "the Monster" by the time it opened, so the North has hosted pro tournaments only sporadically, on occasions the South has been closed for maintenance.


^^^Another headscratcher in professional sports. I stand by my previous post and think that pro events definitely should be played on the north course.


Posted

I always remember this course looking easy and agree with the suggestion that the fairways look huge on tv.  The grass is always in great shape, too.

It is totally unwarranted, but I get the feeling I could play great golf there.  Even though I have no history of this whatsoever.  Trick is that the short game would definitely be the tough part for a hack in a tour event.

ETA: Atlanta Athletic Club looks tough .  The contrast is huge from last week to this week.  Hazards everywhere, tight fairways, elevation changes.


Posted


Originally Posted by FowlPlay

^^^Another headscratcher in professional sports. I stand by my previous post and think that pro events definitely should be played on the north course.

The thing is.. the PRO's demand to not play on the North.. Straight from the directors mouth.. North is more challenging and has far more penalties for errant shots..  Personally, I would love to see the pro's play the north, but that only happens if for some reason South has condition problems..


Note: This thread is 5232 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.